
BuiltWith
Wappalyzer
W3Techs
TheirStack
WhatRuns
Hunter.io
ZoomInfo
Discover the tech behind the web. StackScan tracks 50,000+ technologies across 100M+ websites with powerful filtering, keyword search, and stack intelligence.

ShipFa.st
TurboStarter
Boilerships
Create AI Stack
ExpoShip
Larafast
LaunchFast
Next.js boilerplate for vibe coding with Claude, Cursor and other coding agents. Includes authentication, Stripe payments, emails & AI-optimized architecture.

Which is more popular?
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | stackscan.com | aiboilerplate.dev |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | Startup from Canada · 10 - 19 employees · 2026 | — |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


StackScan helps businesses find and analyze websites based on the technologies they use or the keywords they target. Instead of manually researching websites one by one, users can instantly search across 100M+ domains and identify sites using platforms like Shopify, WordPress, WooCommerce,...
No description of AIBoilerplate.dev yet.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing StackScan and AIBoilerplate.dev.
StackScan's answer
StackScan focuses on practical usability, broader stack coverage, advanced filtering, and scalable exports without unnecessary complexity. Users can quickly generate highly targeted datasets using filters like country, TLD, industry, and technology combinations, making research and lead generation faster and more precise.
AIBoilerplate.dev's answer:
Generic boilerplates (ShipFast and similar) solve the day-one problem: auth, payments, emails, done. They don't solve the day-thirty problem, what your codebase looks like after a hundred AI prompts. If you're building primarily with Claude or Cursor, that's the problem that actually kills projects.
Three concrete differences: (1) the AI guardrails: 10 domain-specific Cursor/Claude rule files and a CLAUDE.md that make the AI generate code consistent with the existing architecture instead of inventing new patterns every session; (2) package isolation: an AI working on billing physically can't break auth; (3) production patterns from engineers with 15+ years of experience who've shipped to over a million users: including security guardrails for the mistakes AI tools make by default (leaked secrets, IDOR, missing validation).
Also: one-time purchase with lifetime updates, no subscription.
StackScan's answer
StackScan combines technology stack discovery and keyword-intent research in a single platform, allowing users to find websites not only by the tools they use but also by what they are targeting online. With coverage across 50,000+ technologies and 100M+ domains, it provides scalable, filterable, and export-ready web intelligence.
AIBoilerplate.dev's answer:
Most boilerplates are built for humans writing code by hand. AI Boilerplate is built for the way people actually build now, describing what they want to Cursor or Claude and letting the AI write most of it.
That changes what the architecture needs to do. The failure mode of AI-assisted development isn't day one, it's prompt 50: the AI starts contradicting its own patterns, one change breaks three unrelated features, and the codebase quietly turns to spaghetti. So everything in AI Boilerplate is designed around preventing that. Built-in Cursor and Claude rules and a CLAUDE.md context file teach the AI your conventions before it writes a line. A modular monorepo (Turborepo + pnpm) isolates packages so the AI can't cascade a change through your whole app. End-to-end TypeScript with tRPC, Prisma, and Zod means AI mistakes get caught at compile time instead of in production.
It's not "a starter kit that happens to work with AI." The AI-comprehension layer is a big part of the product.
StackScan's answer
StackScan is built for marketers, growth teams, agencies, sales teams, analysts, SaaS companies, and researchers who need structured web intelligence for prospecting, competitor analysis, market research, or technology adoption tracking.
AIBoilerplate.dev's answer:
Founders and small teams building real products with AI coding tools: Claude, Cursor, Copilot. Specifically the ones who've already been burned: they vibe-coded something, it worked for a week or two, then adding features started breaking everything and they didn't know how to dig out.
That includes indie hackers and solo founders shipping their own SaaS, freelancers and agencies who need a consistent professional base across client projects, and non-traditional builders who can describe what they want to an AI but don't have the engineering background to architect a codebase from scratch. Comfortable with TypeScript/Next.js territory, or at least comfortable letting the AI operate in it.
StackScan's answer
StackScan was created to simplify the process of finding reliable website and technology data at scale. Existing solutions often felt limited, expensive, or difficult to use for targeted workflows, so StackScan was built as a practical and scalable platform that combines technology detection, keyword discovery, and bulk data access into one system.
AIBoilerplate.dev's answer:
We're a team with 15+ years of combined experience, we've built at companies worth $30M+ and shipped products to over a million users. When AI coding tools took off, we used them like everyone else, and we hit the same wall everyone else did: incredible speed for the first twenty prompts, then a slow slide into inconsistent patterns, cascading bugs, and token bills spent fixing the AI's own mistakes.
The insight was that this isn't an AI problem, it's an architecture problem. AI generates clean code when the codebase teaches it the rules and the structure limits the blast radius of any change. So we took the production patterns we'd used professionally and rebuilt them specifically for AI comprehension, rules files, context files, isolated modules, strict type safety.
Then we proved it on ourselves: PromptCreek, our prompt repository, was rebuilt on top of AI Boilerplate with AI writing the vast majority of the code. That's the codebase that convinced us this was worth turning into a product.
StackScan's answer
StackScan is built using modern web technologies, large-scale crawling systems, distributed data processing, and technology fingerprinting engines designed to analyze and structure massive amounts of web data efficiently.
AIBoilerplate.dev's answer:
Next.js 15 (App Router, Server Components) and React 19, in a Turborepo monorepo with pnpm workspaces. End-to-end TypeScript in strict mode, with tRPC for type-safe APIs, Prisma as the ORM, and Zod for runtime validation. Databases: Supabase (PostgreSQL) and MongoDB. Auth via BetterAuth (email/password, magic links, social login). Stripe for payments and subscriptions, React Email + Resend for transactional email, Tailwind CSS v4 + shadcn/ui for the design system, MDX/Fumadocs for documentation, Cloudflare R2 for storage. Deploys to Vercel.
Plus the AI layer: 10 Cursor/Claude rule files and a CLAUDE.md context file baked into the repo.
StackScan's answer
StackScan is used by agencies, SaaS businesses, growth teams, researchers, and data-driven organizations for lead generation, market intelligence, and competitive analysis across multiple industries.
AIBoilerplate.dev's answer:
PromptCreek, a prompt repository, rebuilt on AI Boilerplate with AI writing ~95% of the code; one of our flagship case study. It reached 1,200+ users in less than 3 months.
Subscription Cancel, built by a non technical founder and currently doing 200+ orders a day.
Smarkive, built and shipped by a non-technical solo founder on top of AI Boilerplate, without hiring a developer.
Independent founders and freelancers shipping client projects on the Teams plan (we're a recent launch, so most customers are early-stage products we can't name publicly yet)
Share your experience with using StackScan and AIBoilerplate.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


While it’s still in early stage, its lifetime deal is really a great value. Must get if you’re into lead generation.
We have no reviews of AIBoilerplate.dev yet. Be the first one to post
When comparing StackScan and AIBoilerplate.dev, you can also consider the following products.

Find out the technology behind websites
Compare BuiltWith to StackScan or AIBoilerplate.dev:

The NextJS boilerplate with all the stuff you need to get your product in front of customers. From idea to production in 5 minutes.
Compare ShipFa.st to StackScan or AIBoilerplate.dev:

Wappalyzer is a technology profilers and leads data provider. Create lists of websites and contacts that use certain technologies.
Compare Wappalyzer to StackScan or AIBoilerplate.dev:

TurboStarter - Ship your startup. Everywhere.
Compare TurboStarter to StackScan or AIBoilerplate.dev:

W3Techs provides information about the usage of various types of technologies on the web.
Compare W3Techs to StackScan or AIBoilerplate.dev:

Nextjs + Supabase + Stripe boilerplates in minutes.
Compare Boilerships to StackScan or AIBoilerplate.dev: