Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

StackRox VS Google Container security

Compare StackRox VS Google Container security and see what are their differences

StackRox logo StackRox

StackRox provides an innovative and comprehensive solution with seamless integration for Kubernetes-native security that focuses on the container.

Google Container security logo Google Container security

Discover how to secure your Kubernetes Engine container environment on Google Cloud Platform (GCP).
  • StackRox Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-21
  • Google Container security Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-20

StackRox features and specs

  • Kubernetes-Native Security
    StackRox is designed specifically for Kubernetes, providing native integration, which allows it to leverage Kubernetes' components for security rather than using an overlay approach.
  • Runtime Threat Detection
    It offers robust runtime threat detection capabilities to identify and address threats as they occur in real-time.
  • Vulnerability Management
    StackRox provides deep visibility into vulnerabilities within containers and across Kubernetes clusters, helping organizations to prioritize and address risks efficiently.
  • Policy Enforcement
    The platform allows for customizable policies to help enforce security best practices and compliance requirements across Kubernetes environments.
  • CI/CD Integration
    Offers integration with CI/CD pipelines to ensure that security tests are automated and embedded into the development process, minimizing security issues in production.

Possible disadvantages of StackRox

  • Kubernetes Dependency
    Being Kubernetes-native, its capabilities might be limited or less effective in environments that do not predominantly use Kubernetes.
  • Complexity of Initial Setup
    The initial setup and configuration might be complex and could require significant time and expertise to tailor the solution to specific environments.
  • Cost
    Depending on the scale and requirements, the cost of deploying and maintaining StackRox may be substantial compared to some other security solutions.
  • Learning Curve
    For teams that are new to Kubernetes or container security, there could be a steep learning curve to fully leverage StackRox's capabilities.
  • Limited Non-Kubernetes Features
    The focus on Kubernetes may mean limited features or optimizations for organizations that use a hybrid approach or alternative container orchestration platforms.

Google Container security features and specs

  • Comprehensive Security Features
    Google Container security offers a wide range of security features such as vulnerability scanning, binary authorization, and network policies, which help in protecting containerized applications from various threats.
  • Integration with Google Cloud
    It seamlessly integrates with Google Cloud services, offering a cohesive security environment that benefits from Google’s extensive infrastructure and security resources.
  • Automatic Security Updates
    Google Container security can automatically apply security patches and updates, ensuring that containers are protected against known vulnerabilities without requiring manual intervention.
  • Policy Enforcement
    Users can define and enforce security policies at scale, helping to maintain a consistent security posture across all containerized environments.
  • Scalability and Performance
    Being part of Google's infrastructure, it benefits from the scalability and performance enhancements of Google Cloud, ensuring that security features do not become a bottleneck.

Possible disadvantages of Google Container security

  • Complexity
    The extensive features and integrations can lead to a steep learning curve and complexity in managing and configuring security settings properly.
  • Cost
    While offering robust security, the cost can be significant, especially for smaller organizations or projects that may not fully utilize all features.
  • Dependency on Google Cloud
    Organizations that rely heavily on multi-cloud strategies may find the integration with Google Cloud a limitation if they want to use similar security features across different cloud providers.
  • Limited to Kubernetes
    This security solution is tailored for Kubernetes, which might limit its applicability if an organization uses multiple container orchestration platforms.
  • Potential Overhead
    Additional security features might introduce overhead, impacting the performance of containerized applications if not correctly configured or optimized.

StackRox videos

Kamal Shah, StackRox | Sumo Logic Illuminate 2019

Google Container security videos

No Google Container security videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to StackRox and Google Container security)
Monitoring Tools
69 69%
31% 31
Online Services
65 65%
35% 35
Security
69 69%
31% 31
Security & Privacy
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using StackRox and Google Container security. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare StackRox and Google Container security

StackRox Reviews

7 Best Container Security Tools & Solutions 2022
StackRox users have compliance capabilities to identify whether nodes and clusters conform to regulations and to adhere to Docker and Kubernetes CIS benchmarks. StackRox makes it easier to show data to auditors, too. StackRox allows businesses to remediate misconfigurations, including excessive privileges, and to create custom policies for configuring builds and deployments.

Google Container security Reviews

We have no reviews of Google Container security yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Google Container security seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

StackRox mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of StackRox yet. Tracking of StackRox recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Google Container security mentions (1)

  • Does the telecom industry need the cloud?
    For example, Google Cloud offers the Anthos solution to manage cloud networks, promising to modernize security with a zero trust security model‎, simplified patching and compliance, and centralized management. Source: over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing StackRox and Google Container security, you can also consider the following products

Qualys - Qualys helps your business automate the full spectrum of auditing, compliance and protection of your IT systems and web applications.

Trend Micro Deep Security - Excellent hybrid cloud security doesn't require your business to sacrifice operational performance. Trend Micro lets you keep business moving securely.

Snyk - Snyk helps you use open source and stay secure. Continuously find and fix vulnerabilities for npm, Maven, NuGet, RubyGems, PyPI and much more.

Lacework - Lacework is a highly trusted platform that provides security for Cloud Environments, DevOps, and Containers.

Symantec Cloud Workload Protection - Symantec Cloud Workload Protection enables business agility and cost savings by automating security for public cloud workloads. Visit Symantec to learn more.

Sysdig - Sysdig is an open source, system-level exploration that capture system state and activity from a running Linux instance, then save, filter and analyze.