Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

stackprof VS OProfile

Compare stackprof VS OProfile and see what are their differences

stackprof

stackprof is a a sampling call-stack profiler for ruby 2.1+

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
OProfile

OProfile is an open source project that includes a statistical profiler, capable of profiling all running code at low overhead.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Eddyter
Build and integrate a WYSIWYG editor in minutes. Eddyter offers fast setup, developer-friendly APIs, and seamless content editing for modern web apps today. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, stackprof seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 3 times since March 2021.

social mentions
3 vs 0
Software Development popularity
51% vs 49%
alternatives listed
15 vs 15

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

stackprof
OProfile
Website github.com oprofile.sourceforge.io
Listed in
Resource Profiling And Monitoring Software Development Memory Monitoring IDE +1
Software Development Resource Profiling And Monitoring Memory Monitoring IDE +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

stackprof 0 features
OProfile 4 features

No features have been listed yet.

  • Comprehensive Profiling
    OProfile provides a wide range of profiling capabilities, offering insights into both user-space and kernel-space performance. This allows developers to understand performance bottlenecks across the entire system.
  • Low Overhead
    It operates with minimal performance overhead, making it suitable for use in production environments without significantly affecting system performance.
  • Wide Platform Support
    OProfile supports a variety of CPU architectures including x86, ARM, and PowerPC, allowing for flexible use across different hardware platforms.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source tool, OProfile is free to use and can be modified to fit specific needs, fostering community contributions and enhancements.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Setup
    The installation and configuration of OProfile can be complex, requiring a good understanding of the system and careful configuration to obtain accurate results.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its comprehensive set of features and detailed data, new users may find it challenging to learn and effectively utilize OProfile without significant time investment.
  • Limited User Interface
    OProfile primarily uses command-line tools, which may not be as user-friendly as graphical interfaces offered by some other profiling tools.
  • Less Frequent Updates
    Compared to some commercial profiling tools, OProfile may receive updates and new features less frequently, potentially slowing down the pace of new developments and improvements.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

stackprof
OProfile

Overall verdict

  • StackProf is a well-regarded, sampling-based profiler for Ruby that provides low-overhead, actionable insights into CPU, wall-clock, object allocation, and memory usage, making it a reliable choice for performance analysis in production and development.

Why this product is good

  • Low-overhead sampling profiler that is safe to run in many scenarios, including production, without significantly impacting performance
  • Supports multiple profiling modes including CPU time, wall-clock time, and object allocation, giving flexibility for different diagnostic needs
  • Produces detailed reports with call graphs and flamegraph output that make it easy to identify hotspots and bottlenecks
  • Well-maintained, widely adopted in the Ruby community, and integrates cleanly with tools like rack-mini-profiler and speedscope
  • Simple API that lets you profile specific code blocks or entire applications with minimal setup

Recommended for

  • Ruby developers needing to diagnose CPU or performance bottlenecks in their applications
  • Teams optimizing Rails applications for latency and throughput
  • Engineers profiling memory allocation and garbage collection pressure
  • Developers who want to generate flamegraphs for visual performance analysis
  • Anyone needing a lightweight profiler suitable for production sampling

No analysis of OProfile yet.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

stackprof 0 videos + Add
OProfile 1 video + Add

No stackprof videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Snapdragon Performance Visualizer Tutorial on OProfile

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
stackprof
OProfile
51% 51%
Software Development
49% 49%
54% 54%
Resource Profiling And Monitoring
46% 46%
50% 50%
IDE
50% 50%
50% 50%
Memory Monitoring
50% 50%

User comments

Share your experience with using stackprof and OProfile. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

stackprof 3 mentions
OProfile 0 mentions
  • A Trick For Reading Flamegraphs
    Stackprof can be used alone/by itself to generate flamegraphs for arbitrary Ruby code. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • Why do my requests take so much time to complete when View and ActiveRecord are finishing fast?
    I’d use something like stackprof ( https://github.com/tmm1/stackprof ) to see where the time is going. If you already have suspicions you can use it to get information about a specific method / few lines of Ruby but there’s also a rack... Source: over 4 years ago
  • Optimizing your tests in 5 steps
    Other profilers, such as stackprof, trace everything that’s happening by line. These types of profilers usually need some instrumentation to be configured, as shown below:. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

Tracking OProfile since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to stackprof and OProfile

When comparing stackprof and OProfile, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...