Software Alternatives & Startups

stackprof VS Get Process Memory

Compare stackprof VS Get Process Memory and see what are their differences

stackprof

stackprof is a a sampling call-stack profiler for ruby 2.1+

Rating
0 reviews
Get Process Memory

Get Process Memory is a library that provides stats on the memory usage of a process.

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, stackprof should be more popular than Get Process Memory. It has been mentioned 3 times since March 2021.

social mentions
3 vs 1
Resource Profiling And Monitoring popularity
56% vs 44%
alternatives listed
15 vs 14

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

stackprof
Get Process Memory
Website github.com github.com
Listed in

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

stackprof
Get Process Memory

Overall verdict

  • StackProf is a well-regarded, sampling-based profiler for Ruby that provides low-overhead, actionable insights into CPU, wall-clock, object allocation, and memory usage, making it a reliable choice for performance analysis in production and development.

Why this product is good

  • Low-overhead sampling profiler that is safe to run in many scenarios, including production, without significantly impacting performance
  • Supports multiple profiling modes including CPU time, wall-clock time, and object allocation, giving flexibility for different diagnostic needs
  • Produces detailed reports with call graphs and flamegraph output that make it easy to identify hotspots and bottlenecks
  • Well-maintained, widely adopted in the Ruby community, and integrates cleanly with tools like rack-mini-profiler and speedscope
  • Simple API that lets you profile specific code blocks or entire applications with minimal setup

Recommended for

  • Ruby developers needing to diagnose CPU or performance bottlenecks in their applications
  • Teams optimizing Rails applications for latency and throughput
  • Engineers profiling memory allocation and garbage collection pressure
  • Developers who want to generate flamegraphs for visual performance analysis
  • Anyone needing a lightweight profiler suitable for production sampling

No analysis of Get Process Memory yet.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
stackprof
Get Process Memory
56% 56%
44% 44%
50% 50%
IDE
50% 50%
50% 50%
50% 50%

User comments

Share your experience with using stackprof and Get Process Memory. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

stackprof 3 mentions
Get Process Memory 1 mention
  • A Trick For Reading Flamegraphs
    Stackprof can be used alone/by itself to generate flamegraphs for arbitrary Ruby code. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • Why do my requests take so much time to complete when View and ActiveRecord are finishing fast?
    I’d use something like stackprof ( https://github.com/tmm1/stackprof ) to see where the time is going. If you already have suspicions you can use it to get information about a specific method / few lines of Ruby but there’s also a rack... Source: over 4 years ago
  • Optimizing your tests in 5 steps
    Other profilers, such as stackprof, trace everything that’s happening by line. These types of profilers usually need some instrumentation to be configured, as shown below:. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • Private space dyno memory limit behaviour
    Not perfect, but not nothing https://github.com/schneems/get_process_mem. Reads from the info at /proc/#{pid}/smaps https://github.com/schneems/get_process_mem/blob/2897a5a76dec655bdc4242ec75538fc7896395f1/lib/get_process_mem.rb#L95-L104. Source: almost 5 years ago

Alternatives to stackprof and Get Process Memory

When comparing stackprof and Get Process Memory, you can also consider the following products.