StackCut.net's answer

StackCut turns a QuickBooks export into a sourced, CFO-ready business case for cutting software spend. Instead of generic benchmarks, it analyzes your actual vendors, flags the specific tools AI can now replace, and quantifies three-year savings with transparent, adjustable assumptions you can defend. It's honest by default — if the savings are negative, it shows that too. Free preview, then a $49 full report. No spreadsheets, no sales call.

you.bot's answer:

you.bot gives you 80+ AI models — LLM, image, video and music — behind a single API, priced well below the official APIs: up to 80% less, from $0.0046 per call. Verified examples versus official list price include Grok Imagine 1.5 video at $0.0178 per second (-78%), GPT Image 2 at $0.0564 per 1K image (-74%) and every current frontier text model at 43-51% off. You only pay for successful generations (failed or empty runs are auto-refunded) and credits never expire, so you get the same top models for less without maintaining a separate SDK and bill for each provider.

StackCut.net's answer

Tools like Zylo, Vendr, Torii, and Sastrify are built for enterprises with procurement teams and annual contracts. StackCut is built for operations and finance leaders at SMBs who need a defensible number fast — no implementation, no sales call. Paste your QuickBooks export and get a sourced PDF in about ten minutes, with a free preview before you pay. The edge is honesty: every figure traces to a benchmark, assumptions are adjustable, and negative savings are shown rather than hidden.

you.bot's answer:

Price and flexibility. Instead of calling each provider directly, you.bot runs the same top models for up to 80% less from one prepaid wallet — Grok Imagine 1.5 video at $0.0178 per second, GPT Image 2 at $0.0564 per 1K image, Claude Sonnet 5 at $1.5367 per million input tokens — and only charges for successful calls (failed or empty runs are refunded). You can keep your existing provider key as a fallback route, so you capture the savings without betting reliability on us, and switching between 80+ models is a one-line change.

StackCut.net's answer

Operations and finance leaders at small and mid-sized businesses evaluating their SaaS spend. They typically arrive with a QuickBooks export and need a savings business case they can present to their CEO. They're time-constrained and skeptical of inflated projections, so they want sourced, defensible numbers rather than hype — exactly what StackCut is built to produce.

StackCut.net's answer

StackCut was built by Shawn Yeager, who spent three decades making technology sell: browsers at Microsoft, infrastructure at Accenture, Bitcoin payments at NYDIG, and an IoT hardware startup he ran as CEO. $300M in revenue across three decades and over 100 companies advised.

After selling software, buying it, and building companies on it, one thing stood out. What a company pays for its tools and what those tools actually cost are never the same number. The subscription is the line item. The real cost is the labor: triaging tickets, manual data entry, and errors from processes nobody tracks.

When AI started replacing entire SaaS categories, that gap became an opportunity. But nobody had a tool that could take a company's actual expense data and show the real number, with sourced benchmarks instead of made-up projections. So he built one.

StackCut.net's answer

StackCut is a web app built with Next.js and React in TypeScript, styled with Tailwind CSS, backed by Neon Postgres, and deployed on Vercel. Vendor matching and spend analysis run client-side in your browser, and the report is generated as a downloadable PDF. Your expense data is never stored on our servers.