Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

SST VS b2evolution

Compare SST VS b2evolution and see what are their differences

SST logo SST

Work on your serverless apps live

b2evolution logo b2evolution

One blog. Multiple blogs. Photo albums. User community. Discussion forums. Online manuals. b2evolution can run them all on a single installation. Right out of the box — plugins fully optional.
  • SST Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27
  • b2evolution Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-01

SST features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    SST is designed to simplify the process of building serverless applications, providing developers with higher-level abstractions and tools that streamline development.
  • Integration with AWS
    SST is well-integrated with AWS services, allowing developers to leverage the full power of AWS infrastructure while maintaining a focus on serverless architecture.
  • Live Lambda Development
    SST supports live Lambda development, enabling developers to make real-time changes and see them reflected immediately without the need for lengthy deployment processes.
  • Infrastructure as Code
    With SST, developers can define their infrastructure programmatically, which promotes version control, scalability, and collaboration among team members.
  • Flexibility
    SST provides flexibility to developers, allowing them to use popular libraries and frameworks alongside serverless components, thus accommodating various use cases.

Possible disadvantages of SST

  • Learning Curve
    Developers unfamiliar with SST and its abstractions may face a learning curve in understanding how to effectively use the toolkit and take full advantage of its features.
  • AWS Lock-in
    As SST is tightly integrated with AWS services, it can lead to vendor lock-in, making it challenging for organizations to switch to other cloud providers in the future.
  • Complexity for Small Projects
    For smaller projects, the overhead introduced by SST's abstractions and tooling might be unnecessary, adding complexity without significant benefits.
  • Dependency on Community Support
    SST relies on community support for maintenance and feature development, which could pose a risk if the community's interest wanes or if support does not keep pace with AWS innovations.

b2evolution features and specs

  • Comprehensive Feature Set
    b2evolution offers a wide range of features out of the box, including multi-site support, forums, photo galleries, and email marketing capabilities, which can reduce the need for additional plugins.
  • Integrated Analytics
    It comes with built-in analytics and reporting tools that help users track the performance of their content directly within the platform.
  • Strong Content Management
    The platform provides powerful content management capabilities, allowing users to organize, categorize, and tag content efficiently, which is beneficial for blogs and large-scale sites.
  • User Management
    b2evolution supports advanced user management with customizable user permissions and roles, making it suitable for sites with multiple contributors and authors.
  • Multi-Language Support
    The platform offers multi-language support, which can be advantageous for websites catering to global audiences.

Possible disadvantages of b2evolution

  • Complexity for Beginners
    b2evolution’s extensive features can be overwhelming for beginners or users looking for a simple blogging platform, leading to a steeper learning curve.
  • Limited Community Support
    Compared to more popular content management systems like WordPress, b2evolution has a smaller user base, which may result in less community support and fewer third-party resources.
  • Design Limitations
    The available themes and templates for b2evolution are somewhat limited, which might require additional effort or technical skills for customization.
  • Plugin Availability
    While offering many features natively, b2evolution has fewer plugins available than some of its competitors, potentially limiting extendability for certain functionalities.
  • Hosting Requirements
    b2evolution may require specific server configurations, which could be a constraint for users on shared hosting plans that do not meet these requirements.

SST videos

Performix sst review fat burner

More videos:

  • Review - Hornady 129gr SST Recovered Bullet Review: 6.5 Creedmoor Deer Load 🦌
  • Review - SST Energy Seltzer Review; The Energy Drink by Performix.

b2evolution videos

How To install B2evolution CMS on Your Web Hosting Account

More videos:

  • Review - b2evolution to WordPress Migration Plugin: How It Works
  • Tutorial - How to Install b2evolution with Fantastico

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to SST and b2evolution)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
CMS
0 0%
100% 100
Open Source
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using SST and b2evolution. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare SST and b2evolution

SST Reviews

We have no reviews of SST yet.
Be the first one to post

b2evolution Reviews

16 Best: Blog Software Comparison (Free / Open-Source Tools)
Knowing the PHP language is pretty much essential for successfully configuring a b2evolution blog. Extensions for enhancing a blog on b2evolution are limited, and they may require configuration with PHP for the best results. The same goes for applying skins and themes. Advanced bloggers with coding skills will be the most satisfied users of b2evolution.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, SST seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 31 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

SST mentions (31)

  • Best/low maintenance devops toolchain for basic sass?
    After researching all night, https://github.com/serverless-stack/sst seems like a good trade off between flexibility, simplicity and features. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Dynamodb design with Appsync
    I use https://github.com/serverless-stack/serverless-stack — not the serverless project. This one is far better. Source: over 4 years ago
  • A magical AWS serverless developer experience
    That said: SST is open source, so you could maybe somehow reimplement their debug stack which is the websockets magic + the Lambda shim in terraform to get it working... Source: over 4 years ago
  • Anti-Patterns to Avoid in Lambda Based Apps
    If you are using CDK then check out SST: https://github.com/serverless-stack/serverless-stack It's based on CDK and has a great local development environment for Lambda. It allows you to set breakpoints and test it locally: https://serverless-stack.com/examples/how-to-debug-lambda-functions-with-visual-studio-code.html. - Source: Hacker News / almost 5 years ago
  • Introducing Serverless Cloud: AWS Serverless Power for Back-Ends—Without the Complexity
    I'll just plug what we built, SST: https://github.com/serverless-stack/serverless-stack. Source: almost 5 years ago
View more

b2evolution mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of b2evolution yet. Tracking of b2evolution recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing SST and b2evolution, you can also consider the following products

Netlify - Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket

Sitecake - Drag and drop CMS for HTML websites. It's flat file CMS so it's pretty fast.

Coolify - An open-source, hassle-free, self-hostable Heroku & Netlify alternative.

ClassicPress - The WordPress fork. No Gutenberg. Great future!

Serverless - Toolkit for building serverless applications

TYPO3 - TYPO3.com - Infos, SLAs, Extended Support Versions and more