Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

SquashTest VS CrossBrowserTesting

Compare SquashTest VS CrossBrowserTesting and see what are their differences

SquashTest

Squash TM is the test repository manager found in the open source Squash toolkit.

SquashTest Landing page
Rating
5.0 · 1 review
Alternatives Is it good?
CrossBrowserTesting

Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

CrossBrowserTesting Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Sugarbug
Connect your tools into a living knowledge graph. Sugarbug captures every signal to deliver compounding insights and unified context. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, CrossBrowserTesting seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 6 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 6
Software Testing popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
45 vs 182

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

SquashTest
CrossBrowserTesting
Website squashtm.com crossbrowsertesting.com
Pricing —
Official pricing
Company 2021 —
Listed in
QA Software Testing Testing Website Testing +1
Website Testing Browser Testing Automated Testing Project Management +1

About SquashTest and CrossBrowserTesting

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

SquashTest
CrossBrowserTesting

Squash TM is one of the best open source and free management test tools for test repository management from the Squash toolkit. It has been designed for sharing test projects between stakeholders. Squash TM offers the following features: - Requirements management - Test cases management - Link...

Read more about SquashTest

No description of CrossBrowserTesting yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

SquashTest 4 features
CrossBrowserTesting 7 features
  • Open Source
    SquashTest is open-source, making it freely available for modification and distribution, which can lead to a community-driven development process.
  • Comprehensive Test Management
    Offers a complete suite for managing manual and automated tests, providing tools for test case creation, execution, and reporting.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Integrates well with various CI/CD tools and version control systems like Jenkins and Git, enhancing workflow automation.
  • Customizable
    Highly customizable to fit different workflows and testing requirements, allowing users to tailor the tool to their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Setup
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex and time-consuming, requiring a level of technical expertise.
  • Learning Curve
    There is a steep learning curve for new users, which may require additional training or resources to use effectively.
  • Limited Official Support
    Being an open-source tool, it may lack extensive official support and relies heavily on community support for troubleshooting.
  • Performance
    May experience performance issues when handling large-scale testing projects due to its architecture.
  • Wide Range of Browsers and Devices
    CrossBrowserTesting offers a large selection of browsers and devices, allowing developers to test their applications in various environments to ensure compatibility.
  • Live Testing
    Users can perform live interactive testing on real devices, enabling them to manually verify the behavior of their application and catch issues that automated tests might miss.
  • Automated Testing Integration
    The platform provides integration with popular testing frameworks and tools such as Selenium, Appium, and others, facilitating automated testing workflows.
  • Visual Testing
    CrossBrowserTesting offers visual testing capabilities, allowing users to compare screenshots from different browsers to identify design inconsistencies.
  • Comprehensive Reports
    Detailed test reports with screenshots and logs are generated, helping users to quickly identify and address issues found during testing.
  • Parallel Testing
    The service supports parallel testing, enabling users to run multiple tests simultaneously, significantly reducing the overall testing time.
  • Easy-to-Use Interface
    The user interface is intuitive and user-friendly, making it easy for both beginners and experienced testers to navigate and utilize the platform effectively.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    CrossBrowserTesting can be expensive, especially for small teams or individual developers who might find the subscription plans to be cost-prohibitive.
  • Performance
    Tests on real devices can sometimes be slow due to the availability and network constraints, which can affect the overall efficiency of the testing process.
  • Limited Mobile Devices
    While the platform includes a variety of devices, the selection might not cover all the latest models or less common devices, potentially limiting testing coverage.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    Some advanced features and integrations might require a learning curve, which could be challenging for users who are not familiar with automated testing or the specific tools supported.
  • Test Timeout Issues
    Occasional issues with test timeouts have been reported, which can disrupt the testing process and require reruns or additional troubleshooting.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

SquashTest
CrossBrowserTesting

No analysis of SquashTest yet.

Overall verdict

  • CrossBrowserTesting is generally regarded as a good solution for cross-browser testing needs, particularly for teams that require real-time testing and robust automation capabilities. Its ease of use, extensive browser/device coverage, and integration options make it a strong choice for many development and QA teams.

Why this product is good

  • CrossBrowserTesting is considered a valuable tool because it provides a cloud-based platform for testing websites and mobile applications across different browsers, devices, and operating systems. It enables developers and QA teams to ensure that their applications function correctly on various platforms without needing to maintain a complex setup of physical devices. The platform offers real-time debugging, automated screenshot testing, and integration with various CI/CD tools, which streamlines the testing process.

Recommended for

    This service is highly recommended for software development teams, QA engineers, and web developers who need to ensure compatibility and functionality of their web applications across multiple browsers and devices. It is particularly useful for organizations with a focus on maintaining high-quality user experiences across various platforms.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

SquashTest 2 videos + Add
CrossBrowserTesting 1 video + Add

Presentation of the new Squash TM User Interface 2.0/2.1

More videos

  • Demo - The Key Features of Squash TM

Cross Browser Testing Tool Comparison – LambdaTest vs. CrossBrowserTesting

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
SquashTest
CrossBrowserTesting
100% 100%
Software Testing
0% 0%
4% 4%
Website Testing
96% 96%
100% 100%
QA
0% 0%
0% 0%
Browser Testing
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using SquashTest and CrossBrowserTesting. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

SquashTest 5.0 · 1 review
CrossBrowserTesting no reviews yet
  • Easy and powerfull tool
    SaaSHub review
    · Feb 2022

    Squash TM is a good tool, I use it since 5 years and it satisfy my needs. A lot of my clients use it for its multi-project ability and the available support for a cheap starter license.

We have no reviews of CrossBrowserTesting yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

SquashTest 0 mentions
CrossBrowserTesting 6 mentions

Tracking SquashTest since Mar 2021.

  • How can I test my site on safari if I don't have a Mac ?
    Yeah I moved on pretty quick from browserstack, but it seems to be the most popular. I've tried crossbrowsertesting.com but at the moment I really like app.lambdatest.com. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • great list of "cool" sites from hnews
    Https://geizhals.de/ - this is a german site but the UI is nice and you can find a lot of stuff. Https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3? - a phone search site. When I was at https://crossbrowsertesting.com we used this site a... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago
  • Learn How To Create, Test and Deploy a Single Page App with Vue 3 + Vite and Pinia
    Fortunately we don’t need to install, nor configure, any other tools, unless maybe some fancy reporters, but for now we can get everything we need in terms of end-to-end automated testing out of Nightwatch. Besides Chrome, Nightwatch has... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

View more

Alternatives to SquashTest and CrossBrowserTesting

When comparing SquashTest and CrossBrowserTesting, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...