Software Alternatives & Startups

SQL Server 2017 VS Windward Java Engine

Compare SQL Server 2017 VS Windward Java Engine and see what are their differences

SQL Server 2017

Jul 1, 2017 - Learn about tools and services for mobile and paginated Reporting Services reports and Power BI reports on premises.

Rating
0 reviews
Windward Java Engine

The Windward Java reporting and document generation Engine runs on one or more servers as part of...

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Data Dashboard popularity
72% vs 28%
alternatives listed
70 vs 20

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

SQL Server 2017
Windward Java Engine
Website microsoft.com windward.net
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

SQL Server 2017 5 features
Windward Java Engine 5 features
  • Cross-Platform Support
    SQL Server 2017 offers cross-platform support, enabling it to run on Windows, Linux, and Docker containers, providing flexibility and integration into various environments.
  • Graph Database Capabilities
    Introduces graph database capabilities, allowing the modeling of complex data relationships easily and efficiently, expanding its use cases.
  • Advanced Analytics
    Integrates with Microsoft R and Python services, facilitating advanced analytics and machine learning directly within the database, which helps organizations to perform sophisticated data analysis.
  • Adaptive Query Processing
    Includes adaptive query processing features to optimize query performance automatically, improving application speed and efficiency.
  • Enhanced Security
    SQL Server 2017 continues to enhance security with features like Always Encrypted, Dynamic Data Masking, and Row-Level Security to protect sensitive data.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Licensing and support costs for SQL Server can be relatively high, particularly for enterprise editions, which may not be cost-effective for smaller organizations.
  • Complexity
    SQL Server 2017 includes a vast array of features and configurations that can introduce complexity, requiring substantial expertise to manage and optimize.
  • Resource Intensive
    Requires significant system resources for optimal performance, which may necessitate additional investment in hardware to operate efficiently at scale.
  • Limited NoSQL Functionality
    While SQL Server 2017 introduces some NoSQL features through its support for JSON and graph databases, it still lags behind dedicated NoSQL databases in terms of flexibility and scalability for unstructured data.
  • Version-Specific Features
    Some advanced features are only available in the latest versions or specific editions, which may necessitate upgrades or specific licensing to access the full capabilities, leading to additional expenses.
  • Flexibility
    The Windward Java Engine allows for highly flexible report generation capabilities. It seamlessly integrates with various data sources and can generate a wide range of document formats, making it adaptable to different needs.
  • Efficiency
    It is known for its efficient processing, which results in faster report generation. This is particularly advantageous for businesses that require real-time reporting.
  • Robust Template Design
    The engine supports robust template design using Microsoft Office tools like Word, Excel, and PowerPoint, which reduces the learning curve and empowers users to leverage familiar interfaces for template creation.
  • Scalability
    Windward's Java Engine is scalable, making it suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises. It can handle extensive datasets and generate complex reports without compromising on performance.
  • Customization
    The engine offers extensive customization options, allowing developers to tailor reporting features and functionalities to meet specific organizational requirements.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complexity
    The extensive features and customizable options might introduce complexity, especially for users who are not familiar with Java or who have limited technical experience.
  • Cost
    As a comprehensive solution, it may come with a higher cost compared to simpler or less feature-rich alternatives, potentially impacting smaller businesses or startups with limited budgets.
  • Initial Setup
    The initial setup of the Windward Java Engine might be time-consuming and require technical expertise, which could pose a challenge for organizations without dedicated IT resources.
  • Resource Intensive
    Due to its feature-rich nature, the engine may be resource-intensive, requiring sufficient hardware capabilities to maintain optimal performance, especially for large-scale deployments.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

SQL Server 2017
Windward Java Engine

No analysis of SQL Server 2017 yet.

Overall verdict

  • Windward (now Fluent by Apryse) is a solid, mature document automation and reporting engine that lets developers design templates directly in Microsoft Office and generate documents in multiple formats, making it a good choice for teams that prioritize business-user-friendly template design and enterprise integration.

Why this product is good

  • Templates are designed in familiar Microsoft Office tools (Word, Excel, PowerPoint), allowing non-technical business users to build and maintain them
  • Supports generating output in multiple formats including PDF, DOCX, XLSX, HTML, and more from a single template
  • Robust data connectivity to SQL databases, XML, JSON, and other data sources
  • Provides a Java engine (as well as .NET) for embedding document generation directly into enterprise applications
  • Well-suited for high-volume, data-driven document and report generation
  • Backed by an established vendor with enterprise support and documentation

Recommended for

  • Enterprises needing to automate high-volume, data-driven document generation
  • Development teams building reporting or document-output features into Java or .NET applications
  • Organizations where business users need to create and maintain templates without coding
  • Use cases requiring output across multiple file formats from a single template
  • Industries like finance, insurance, and government with complex reporting and compliance document needs

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

SQL Server 2017 2 videos + Add
Windward Java Engine 0 videos + Add

SQL Server 2017 – Everything you need to know

More videos

  • - SQL Server 2017 Features

No Windward Java Engine videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
SQL Server 2017
Windward Java Engine
72% 72%
28% 28%
68% 68%
32% 32%
68% 68%
32% 32%
50% 50%
50% 50%

User comments

Share your experience with using SQL Server 2017 and Windward Java Engine. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Alternatives to SQL Server 2017 and Windward Java Engine

When comparing SQL Server 2017 and Windward Java Engine, you can also consider the following products.