Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Spring Security VS JSON Web Token

Compare Spring Security VS JSON Web Token and see what are their differences

Spring Security logo Spring Security

The Spring portfolio has many projects, including Spring Framework, Spring IO Platform, Spring Cloud, Spring Boot, Spring Data, Spring Security...

JSON Web Token logo JSON Web Token

JSON Web Tokens are an open, industry standard RFC 7519 method for representing claims securely between two parties.
  • Spring Security Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-18
  • JSON Web Token Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-19

Spring Security features and specs

  • Comprehensive Security Features
    Spring Security offers a wide range of security features including authentication, authorization, and protection against common attacks like CSRF and XSS.
  • Integration with Spring Ecosystem
    Seamless integration with the Spring Framework, allowing easy configuration and use within existing Spring applications.
  • Customizable
    Highly customizable, allowing developers to extend and tweak the default behavior to meet specific project needs.
  • Active Community and Support
    Backed by a large community and extensive documentation, offering numerous resources for troubleshooting and learning.
  • Declarative Security
    Supports declarative security via annotations and configuration, simplifying the process of securing applications.
  • Comprehensive Testing Support
    Provides utilities and support for comprehensive security testing, ensuring that your security configurations work as expected.
  • Strong Access Control
    Offers robust access control mechanisms, allowing fine-grained permission settings for different users and roles.
  • OAuth2 and OpenID Connect Support
    Built-in support for OAuth2 and OpenID Connect protocols, making it easier to implement modern security practices.

Possible disadvantages of Spring Security

  • Complexity
    The extensive feature set and configuration options can make Spring Security overly complex, especially for beginners.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its comprehensive nature, there is a steep learning curve, which can be time-consuming for new developers.
  • Configuration Overhead
    Significant time and effort may be required to properly configure all security aspects, particularly for large applications.
  • Performance Overhead
    The additional security layers can introduce some performance overhead, which could be significant in high-traffic applications.
  • Dependency on Spring Framework
    Tightly coupled with the Spring Framework, which limits its usage in non-Spring-based applications.
  • Frequent Updates
    Frequent updates and changes may require regular maintenance and adaptation in order to stay up-to-date.
  • Limited Support for Non-Web Applications
    Primarily designed for web applications, with fewer features and less support for non-web environments.
  • Verbose Configuration
    XML and Java-based configuration can be verbose and cumbersome, leading to potential misconfigurations.

JSON Web Token features and specs

  • Stateless
    Since JWTs are self-contained, they do not require server-side sessions, enabling stateless authentication and reducing server memory usage.
  • Scalability
    JWTs can easily be used in distributed systems and microservices architectures due to their stateless nature, facilitating horizontal scaling.
  • Decentralized Issuance
    Multiple issuers can create and sign their own tokens, allowing for more decentralized and flexible authentication mechanisms.
  • Performance
    JWTs eliminate the need for database lookups during authenticating requests, as the token contains all the necessary information, which can lead to performance improvements.
  • Cross-domain and Mobile Compatible
    JWTs are widely supported by different platforms and can easily be used in cross-domain situations and with mobile applications.
  • Security
    JWTs can be signed and optionally encrypted, ensuring the authenticity and integrity of the data they carry.

Possible disadvantages of JSON Web Token

  • Size
    JWTs tend to be larger than session IDs, which can increase the amount of data transmitted during requests.
  • Expiration Handling
    Managing token expiration can be complex. Once a token is issued, it remains valid until it expires or is explicitly revoked.
  • No Built-in Revocation
    Unlike sessions, JWTs cannot be easily revoked server-side, making it difficult to immediately invalidate tokens without additional mechanisms.
  • Security Risks
    If a JWT is intercepted or compromised, it can be used until it expires. Thus, it should be properly secured and transmitted over HTTPS.
  • Token Overhead
    Embedding too much information in the token payload can lead to performance overhead and potential data exposure risks.
  • Complexity
    Implementing JWT correctly requires a thorough understanding of security practices and token lifecycle management, which can add complexity to the system.

Analysis of JSON Web Token

Overall verdict

  • JWT is a widely-accepted standard used for securely transmitting information between parties as a JSON object. It is a good choice for scenarios where security and scalability are primary concerns. However, it also requires careful implementation to ensure security, especially when dealing with sensitive information.

Why this product is good

  • JSON Web Token (JWT) is a compact, URL-safe means of representing claims to be transferred between two parties. The claims in a JWT are encoded as a JSON object that is used as the payload of a JSON Web Signature (JWS) structure or as the plaintext of a JSON Web Encryption (JWE) structure, enabling the claims to be digitally signed or integrity protected with a Message Authentication Code (MAC) and/or encrypted.

Recommended for

  • Stateless authentication
  • Distributed systems
  • Microservices architecture
  • Applications needing scalable, self-contained access tokens
  • Browser-based applications

Spring Security videos

Spring Security 17 Security Context Holder

More videos:

  • Review - Spring security password encoding and DelegatingPasswordEncoder

JSON Web Token videos

JSON Web Tokens Suck - Randall Degges (DevNet Create 2018)

More videos:

  • Review - JSON Web Tokens with Public Key Signatures
  • Review - RFC 7519 JSON Web Token (JWT), Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Spring Security and JSON Web Token)
Identity And Access Management
Identity Provider
0 0%
100% 100
Application Utilities
100 100%
0% 0
Utilities
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Spring Security and JSON Web Token. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, JSON Web Token seems to be a lot more popular than Spring Security. While we know about 303 links to JSON Web Token, we've tracked only 12 mentions of Spring Security. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Spring Security mentions (12)

View more

JSON Web Token mentions (303)

  • Access and Refresh Token Explained
    The key aspect of the separation between access and refresh tokens lies in the possibility of making access tokens easy to validate. An access token that carries a signature (such as a signed JWT) may be validated by the resource server on its own, without needing to contact the authorization server. - Source: dev.to / 1 day ago
  • OAuth 2.0 Overview: How It Works and Why It Matters
    Access Token: A string representing the authorization granted to the client. It’s used by the client to access protected resources on the resource server. Access tokens are typically short-lived for security reasons (e.g., valid for an hour). They can be in various formats, with JSON Web Tokens (JWTs) being a popular choice. - Source: dev.to / 4 days ago
  • OAuth or JWT? Everything Developers Need to Know in 2025
    ​Security Considerations • JWT o Always use HTTPS to prevent token interception o Set short expiration times o Avoid storing sensitive data in the token • OAuth o Always validate redirect URIs o Implement proper token revocation o Consider using PKCE for public clients References • The Ultimate Guide to Implementing Authentication in JavaScript Applications • OAuth 2.0 – RFC 6749 • JWT.io –... - Source: dev.to / 29 days ago
  • Guide to JWT API Authentication
    Jwt.io is a great playground to get used to working with JWTs. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Verifying Cognito access tokens - Comparing three JWT packages for Lambda authorizers
    The Lambda authorizer code decodes and verifies the token, and its business logic determines whether the request should proceed to the backend or be denied. Cognito access tokens are JSON Web Tokens (JWTs), and to simplify our coding, we might opt for an external package to handle token verification. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Spring Security and JSON Web Token, you can also consider the following products

OpenSSL - OpenSSL is a free and open source software cryptography library that implements both the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, which are primarily used to provide secure communications between web browsers and …

Auth0 - Auth0 is a program for people to get authentication and authorization services for their own business use.

Let's Encrypt - Let’s Encrypt is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Firebase Authentication - Application and Data, Application Utilities, and User Management and Authentication

Ensighten - Ensighten provides enterprise tag management solutions that enable businesses manage their websites more effectively.

OAuth2 - Application and Data, Application Utilities, and User Management and Authentication