Splitview VS QuickTile

• Enhanced Productivity
  SplitView allows users to easily manage multiple applications and documents simultaneously by splitting the screen, which can greatly enhance productivity by reducing the time spent switching between windows.
• User Flexibility
  The application provides users with the flexibility to configure and customize how their screen is split, catering to individual needs and preferences.
• Improved Multitasking
  By enabling users to view multiple applications at once, SplitView improves multitasking capabilities, which can be beneficial for those who need to compare data or work on several tasks concurrently.
• Ease of Use
  SplitView is designed to be user-friendly, allowing even those with limited technical skills to manage their screen space effectively without a steep learning curve.

Possible disadvantages

• System Performance
  Running multiple applications on split screens can be demanding on system resources, potentially leading to slower performance on less powerful computers.
• Compatibility Issues
  Some users may experience compatibility issues with specific applications or systems, which could limit the effectiveness of the software in certain environments.
• Limited Screen Space
  On smaller screens, splitting the view could lead to cramped workspaces and may not be as effective as on larger monitors.
• Cost
  Unlike some built-in operating system features, SplitView may require a purchase, which could be a consideration for budget-conscious users or organizations.

• Ease of Use
  QuickTile provides a straightforward approach to window tiling, allowing users to manage window layouts efficiently without complex configurations.
• Customization
  It supports extensive customization, enabling users to define their own tiling layouts and shortcuts to suit their workflow needs.
• Lightweight
  QuickTile is lightweight and doesn't consume significant system resources, making it suitable for older or less powerful machines.
• Cross-Platform
  QuickTile is compatible with various Linux distributions, making it accessible to a wide range of Linux users.

Possible disadvantages

• Linux Only
  QuickTile is designed for Linux systems, which means users on other operating systems like Windows or macOS cannot use it.
• Limited Features
  Compared to full-fledged tiling window managers, QuickTile offers a more limited set of features focused solely on tiling.
• Manual Configuration
  Some users may find the initial setup and configuration to be manual and time-consuming, especially if they want to tailor their shortcuts extensively.
• No GUI
  QuickTile operates without a graphical user interface, which might not appeal to users who prefer visual configuration tools.

Tracking Splitview since Mar 2021.

• My (challenging) experience building a window switcher for Ubuntu

  As the author of QuickTile, which is written in Python but even closer to what you describe than a window manager would be, I have to say that, yeah, doing X11 stuff takes a lot of knowledge that's not ideally documented in non-print... Source: over 3 years ago

• Rust's problematic reliance on GitHub

  Actually, I plan to add a .nojekyll file and then use something like Pelican with custom plugins, then set GitHub Actions to run my update.sh on push... Similar to how http://ssokolow.com/quicktile/ is a Sphinx-based site hosted on... Source: over 4 years ago

• tilling wm on elementary os ?

  I've been using ssokolow.com/quicktile for this purpose, it does what I need and doesn't replace the wm. Source: over 4 years ago

View more