Software Alternatives & Startups

Splid VS react-testing-library

Compare Splid VS react-testing-library and see what are their differences

Splid

Splid helps friends manage their money.

react-testing-library

[`React Testing Library`][gh] builds on top of `DOM Testing Library` by adding

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, react-testing-library seems to be a lot more popular than Splid. While we know about 138 links to react-testing-library, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Splid.

social mentions
2 vs 138
Personal Finance popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
146 vs 76

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Splid
react-testing-library
Website splid.app testing-library.com
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Splid 5 features
react-testing-library 5 features
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Splid offers an intuitive and easy-to-use interface that makes it simple for users to split expenses without any confusion.
  • Offline Functionality
    Users can log expenses and use the app even without an internet connection, which is useful in remote areas.
  • Multiple Currency Support
    Splid allows users to add expenses in different currencies, making it convenient for international travel and expenses.
  • No Sign-Up Required
    The app does not require users to create an account, simplifying access and reducing privacy concerns.
  • Easy Sharing
    Users can easily share expense reports with group members via a link, simplifying communication and transparency.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Integration
    Splid lacks integration with other financial apps or services, which can limit its functionality for some users.
  • Manual Expense Entry
    All expenses must be entered manually, which can be time-consuming compared to apps that offer receipt scanning.
  • No Real-Time Sync
    Changes are not updated in real-time across devices, potentially leading to discrepancies if multiple users are managing a list.
  • Basic Features Free
    While the basic app is free, advanced features require a paid upgrade, which might not be ideal for all users.
  • Limited to Group Expense
    Splid is focused on group expense sharing, lacking features for individual finance management or budgeting.
  • Focused on user-centric testing
    React Testing Library encourages tests that closely resemble how users interact with an application. This approach makes tests more reliable and meaningful.
  • Reduces coupling to implementation details
    By encouraging developers to interact with components via the DOM, the library minimizes dependencies on component internals, making tests less prone to breaking from refactors.
  • Improved test readability
    Tests written with React Testing Library are generally easier to read and understand because they focus on what the user sees and does, rather than the internal logic of the components.
  • Comprehensive query options
    The library provides a wide range of query methods (e.g., getByText, getByRole), which makes it easy to select elements in ways that resemble how users think.
  • Active community and well-maintained
    React Testing Library has a strong, active community and it's maintained by experienced developers who keep the library up-to-date with React's evolution.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited support for non-DOM testing
    The library is heavily focused on DOM interactions, making it less suited for testing non-DOM logic or scenarios that don't involve user interactions.
  • Can be slower
    Tests that involve the DOM can be slower compared to tests that interact directly with component methods and state, which can lead to longer test execution times.
  • Learning curve for traditional testers
    Developers who are used to testing implementation details with other tools (like Enzyme) might find it challenging to adjust to the user-centric approach advocated by React Testing Library.
  • Potential for less granular control
    Because the library encourages testing through the UI, developers might find it harder to test specific, isolated internal behaviors of components that aren't directly visible to users.
  • Dependencies on browser APIs
    The library's reliance on browser APIs means that tests may behave differently in different environments or may require polyfills for certain features, leading to potential inconsistencies.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Splid
react-testing-library

No analysis of Splid yet.

Overall verdict

  • React Testing Library is highly regarded in the React community for its simplicity and effective approach to testing React components. It’s known for promoting good testing practices that result in reliable and maintainable code.

Why this product is good

  • React Testing Library is considered good because it encourages testing practices that closely resemble how users interact with the application. It emphasizes testing components from the user's perspective and discourages testing implementation details, which can lead to more robust and maintainable tests.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking to improve the reliability of their React applications
  • Teams interested in adopting user-centric testing methodologies
  • Projects that prioritize maintainable and understandable test code

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Splid 3 videos + Add
react-testing-library 2 videos + Add

"Splid" by Kvelertak (ALBUM OF THE YEAR CONTENDER?) | ALBUM REVIEW

More videos

  • - Album Review/Reaction: Kvelertak - Splid
  • - Kvelertak: Splid -- 💿 album review 💿

React unit testing with Jest & React-testing-library

More videos

  • - Test a React Component that renders a list with react-testing-library

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Splid
react-testing-library
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Splid and react-testing-library. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Splid 5.0 · 1 review
react-testing-library no reviews yet
  • 12 Best Bill Splitting Apps in 2023
    www.mobileappdaily.com · Oct 2023

    Splid is an excellent app for those who want to take their bill splitting to the next level. It is among the popular bill splitting apps that supports advanced features like location-based payment suggestions,...

  • great! easy to use, versatile, flexible. Recommended.
    SaaSHub review
    · Mar 2023

    I prefer this app to similar ones I've tried. It seems clearer, more straightforward and simpler to use for normal holidays etc. But if you need more complex arrangements it's versatile too: in that you can...

  • Best Bill-Splitting Apps
    www.thebalancemoney.com · Mar 2023

    Splitting up the cost of group trips can be tough. Splid allows you to add in all the expenses of a trip and then split it up among each person on the trip. The app is useful for splitting up non-trip expenses as...

We have no reviews of react-testing-library yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Splid 2 mentions
react-testing-library 138 mentions
  • Running an Open Source App: Usage, Costs and Community Donations
    Would be interesting to see how this compares to https://splid.app/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Show HN: An alternative to Splitwise, more minimalist, no ads, no account
    Https://splid.app/ is a great no-account alternative. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
  • Moving from Angular to React: A Practical Guide
    Testing Library. React Testing Library. https://testing-library.com/docs/react-testing-library/intro/. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Test-Driven Development for Building User Interfaces
    React Testing Library’s core philosophy is that we should write our tests in such a way that we simulate user behavior. By testing what the user can actually do, our tests focus less on implementation details and more on the actual user... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Chaos-Driven Testing for Full Stack Apps: Integration Tests That Break (and Heal)
    In the main branch, we set up Vitest as the test runner and React Testing Library for rendering the component and simulating user interactions. We also set up MSW to intercept the network requests and return mock responses. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

View more

Alternatives to Splid and react-testing-library

When comparing Splid and react-testing-library, you can also consider the following products.