Software Alternatives & Startups

speedtest-cli VS cppq

Compare speedtest-cli VS cppq and see what are their differences

speedtest-cli

Test your download speed using SpeedTest on the command-line

Rating
0 reviews
cppq

Simple, reliable & efficient distributed task queue for C++

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, speedtest-cli seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 13 times since March 2021.

social mentions
13 vs 0
Developer Tools popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

speedtest-cli
cppq
Website github.com github.com
Listed in —

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

speedtest-cli 5 features
cppq 5 features
  • Open Source
    Speedtest-cli is open-source, meaning the source code is freely available for anyone to inspect, modify, and enhance.
  • Command Line Interface
    Allows users to run internet speed tests from the command line, which can be useful for automation, scripting, and use on headless servers.
  • Platform Independent
    Runs on multiple systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it versatile for use across different environments.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Can be easily integrated with other applications and monitoring systems for automated performance tracking and reporting.
  • No Ads
    Unlike web-based speed test services, speedtest-cli does not display any advertisements, offering a cleaner user experience.

Possible disadvantages

  • Requires Terminal Knowledge
    Users need to be familiar with the command line interface, which might be a barrier for those who are accustomed to graphical user interfaces.
  • No Graphical Output
    Lacks a visual representation of the speed test results, which can be a disadvantage for users who prefer graphical data.
  • Limited Server Selection
    Automated server selection might not always choose the best server for testing, potentially affecting the accuracy of results.
  • Dependencies
    Speedtest-cli relies on Python and the 'pip' package manager, which may require additional setup steps for some users.
  • Feature Limitations
    Not all features of the web-based Speedtest service (like detailed historical data) are available in the CLI version.
  • Lightweight C++ implementation
    cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
  • Redis-backed reliability
    Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
  • Inspired by proven design (asynq)
    The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
  • Native integration for C++ projects
    For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
  • Open source and inspectable
    Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited maturity and battle-testing
    Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
  • Smaller community and ecosystem
    Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
  • Documentation gaps
    As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
  • C++ build and dependency complexity
    Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
  • Fewer built-in features and tooling
    cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

speedtest-cli
cppq

Overall verdict

  • Speedtest-cli is a reliable and effective tool for quickly assessing internet speed from the command line. It is well-regarded in the tech community for personal use, troubleshooting, and integration into network monitoring solutions.

Why this product is good

  • Speedtest-cli is a popular command-line tool that allows users to measure Internet bandwidth performance by using the Speedtest.net infrastructure. It is favored for its simplicity, ease of use, and ability to function on systems without a graphical user interface. It supports automated testing through scripts, making it suitable for batch processing and integration into monitoring systems.

Recommended for

  • System administrators who need a tool to monitor bandwidth performance across different machines.
  • Developers who require automation of speed tests in scripts.
  • Users who prefer command-line interfaces instead of graphical user interfaces.
  • Individuals seeking a lightweight and straightforward way to test internet speed without additional software installations.

Overall verdict

  • cppq is a lightweight, Redis-backed distributed task queue for C++ inspired by Go's popular 'asynq' library. It's a good choice for developers who need a simple, dependency-light job queue system in C++ without the overhead of larger enterprise messaging systems, though it's a smaller, less battle-tested project compared to mature alternatives.

Why this product is good

  • Simple and lightweight design makes it easy to understand and integrate into existing C++ projects
  • Built on Redis, a well-established and reliable backend for queue storage, giving it a solid foundation
  • Inspired by asynq (a proven Go library), so the design patterns and task queue semantics are based on a well-thought-out model
  • Open source on GitHub, allowing developers to inspect, modify, and contribute to the code
  • Good fit for projects already using Redis, minimizing the need for additional infrastructure
  • Straightforward API for enqueueing and processing background jobs in C++ applications

Recommended for

  • C++ developers needing a background job/task queue without adopting a heavyweight message broker
  • Projects already using Redis as part of their infrastructure
  • Small to medium-sized applications requiring asynchronous task processing
  • Teams comfortable working with less mainstream or smaller open-source libraries and willing to contribute or debug issues themselves
  • Developers familiar with asynq (Go) looking for a similar pattern in C++
  • Prototyping or hobby projects where a minimal task queue solution is sufficient

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

speedtest-cli 2 videos + Add
cppq 0 videos + Add

Testing Internet Bandwidth From The Terminal Using Speedtest-cli

More videos

  • - Test internet bandwidth using speedtest-cli

No cppq videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
speedtest-cli
cppq
100% 100%
0% 0%
100% 100%
0% 0%
100% 100%
0% 0%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using speedtest-cli and cppq. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

speedtest-cli 13 mentions
cppq 0 mentions
  • CLI Tools every Developer should know
    Or, you can follow the installation instructions on the official GitHub repository: SpeedTest-CLI Installation Guide. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Routing table confusion, or did Kirkland move to Kansas?
    That's a community cli client https://github.com/sivel/speedtest-cli rather than the official cli client https://www.speedtest.net/apps/cli. Source: over 3 years ago
  • running script via cron does not provide full output
    If you read the docs for Speedtest-CLI you will see that the program timeouts after 10 seconds. Try using this for default timeout of 1 minute and also redirect errors to the same file. Speedtest-cli --timeout 60 >>... Source: almost 4 years ago

View more

Tracking cppq since Nov 2022.

Alternatives to speedtest-cli and cppq

When comparing speedtest-cli and cppq, you can also consider the following products.