Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Solid Explorer VS Materialize CSS

Compare Solid Explorer VS Materialize CSS and see what are their differences

Solid Explorer

Solid Explorer is a powerful Android file manager featuring access to most popular cloud storages, root access and easy extensibility.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Materialize CSS

A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
warmup.rocks
warmup.rocks keeps your CDN cache warm in every edge location worldwide: Cloudflare, Fastly, Akamai, CloudFront and more. Warming from 42 countries, hit-ratio analytics. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Materialize CSS seems to be a lot more popular than Solid Explorer. While we know about 28 links to Materialize CSS, we've tracked only 1 mention of Solid Explorer.

social mentions
1 vs 28
File Manager popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
159 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Solid Explorer
Materialize CSS
Website neatbytes.com materializecss.com
Pricing —
Open source
Listed in
File Manager File Explorer Tool FTP Client +1
CSS Framework Design Tools Developer Tools Development Tools +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Solid Explorer 6 features
Materialize CSS 5 features
  • User Interface
    Solid Explorer has a clean and visually appealing user interface that supports both light and dark themes, making it pleasant to use.
  • Dual-pane mode
    The app supports a dual-pane mode, which allows you to manage files in two different locations simultaneously, enhancing productivity.
  • Cloud Storage Integration
    Solid Explorer supports a wide range of cloud storage services like Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive, and more, allowing for seamless file management across different platforms.
  • File Encryption
    The app includes features for encrypting and decrypting files, providing an extra layer of security for sensitive information.
  • Customization Options
    Solid Explorer offers extensive customization options, allowing users to change themes, icon sets, and layout to fit their preference.
  • Root Access
    It supports root access for rooted devices, enabling advanced file management tasks such as modifying system files.

Possible disadvantages

  • Payment Required
    Solid Explorer offers a 14-day trial period, after which a one-time payment is required to continue using the app, which might deter some users.
  • Occasional Bugs
    Some users have reported occasional bugs and crashes, which can disrupt the file management experience.
  • Storage Permissions
    The app requires extensive storage permissions, which some users might find concerning from a privacy standpoint.
  • Resource Intensive
    Solid Explorer can be resource-intensive, consuming more battery and memory compared to some of its competitors.
  • Limited Free Features
    While the app is feature-rich, the free version has limited functionalities, which could be a downside for users not willing to pay.
  • Responsive Design
    Materialize CSS provides a responsive grid system, making it easier to create layouts that work well on various screen sizes and devices.
  • Material Design
    Adheres to Google's Material Design principles, offering a modern and professional look that is consistent across web applications.
  • Component Variety
    Offers a wide range of pre-built components, including forms, buttons, cards, and navigation bars, which helps speed up development.
  • Customization
    Provides options to customize components using Sass, making it flexible for specific design needs.
  • Built-in JavaScript
    Includes built-in JavaScript components like modals, carousels, and tabs, which enhance functionality without requiring additional libraries.

Possible disadvantages

  • Learning Curve
    Although it follows Material Design guidelines, there is a learning curve associated with understanding and implementing its various components and classes.
  • File Size
    Including the full library can make your project heavier, affecting load times, especially for users on slower connections.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customizable, deeply customizing or overriding default styles can sometimes be complicated and time-consuming.
  • Dependency on jQuery
    Some components still rely on jQuery, adding to the library size and potentially conflicting with modern JavaScript practices.
  • Community Support
    Compared to larger frameworks like Bootstrap, Materialize CSS has a smaller community, which can result in fewer third-party resources and plugins.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Solid Explorer
Materialize CSS

Overall verdict

  • Solid Explorer is generally considered a good file management app, appreciated for its comprehensive functionality and ease of use. It is well-regarded for providing solid performance and reliability.

Why this product is good

  • Solid Explorer is popular for its clean and intuitive user interface, robust file management features, and strong support for cloud storage integration. It offers dual-pane navigation, file encryption, and extensive customization options, making it versatile for various file management needs.

Recommended for

  • Users looking for a feature-rich file manager with cloud integration
  • Those who appreciate customizable interfaces
  • Users who need efficient file management on Android devices
  • Individuals looking for secure file encryption options

Overall verdict

  • Materialize CSS is a good choice if you're looking for a framework that emphasizes Material Design and comes with a sleek, modern interface. It's particularly useful for developers who want to quickly integrate Google's design philosophy without delving into custom styling or layout creation.

Why this product is good

  • Materialize CSS is a front-end framework based on Material Design principles developed by Google. It provides a comprehensive set of UI components that help developers create visually appealing and responsive web applications quickly. The framework includes a variety of pre-styled components like buttons, forms, cards, and much more, which adhere to the Material Design guidelines. This consistency in design components helps ensure a cohesive and professional look across web applications. Additionally, it simplifies responsive design with a grid system that's easy to implement, and it comes with excellent documentation and a supportive community.

Recommended for

    Materialize CSS is recommended for teams and developers who prefer Google's Material Design aesthetic, are building applications with a focus on rapid UI development, and value consistency and ease of use. It's also great for projects where a pre-existing UI library speeds up the development process, such as prototypes, admin dashboards, or smaller web applications. However, for highly customized UI components or non-Material Design projects, other frameworks might be more suitable.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Solid Explorer 3 videos + Add
Materialize CSS 1 video + Add

Es File Explorer Vs Solid Explorer

More videos

  • - 8 Cool Things You Can do with Solid Explorer - Best ES File Explorer Alternative
  • - best paid android apps 2016 - Solid explorer file manager (Review, Pros, Cons, Does It Worth It)

Build A Travel Agency Theme With Materialize CSS 1.0.0

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Solid Explorer
Materialize CSS
100% 100%
File Manager
0% 0%
0% 0%
Design Tools
100% 100%
100% 100%
File Explorer
0% 0%
0% 0%
CSS Framework
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Solid Explorer and Materialize CSS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Solid Explorer no reviews yet
Materialize CSS no reviews yet

View more

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Solid Explorer 1 mention
Materialize CSS 28 mentions
  • JavaScript Awesome Package
    Materialize - Responsive front-end framework based on Material Design. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Mistakes Were Made
    Sure, why not use Blazor? It makes life easier for the developers who are primarily backend, to work on the frontend as well. Seems like the better choice. So what's next? The UI library. No shade to the long-time standing Bootstrap, but... - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Top 5 Best CSS Frameworks for Responsive Web Design in 2024
    Materialize is a modern CSS framework based on Google’s Material Design. It was created and designed by Google to provide a unified and consistent user interface across all its products. Materialize is focused on user experience as it... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Solid Explorer and Materialize CSS

When comparing Solid Explorer and Materialize CSS, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...