socketify.py VS Open Postern
Compare socketify.py VS Open Postern and see what are their differences
Automated 60-second forensic business auditing pipeline powered by OpenAI Nano AI. Built for consultants and analysts.
sponsored
socketify.py
Open Postern
Vanta
UpGuard
OneTrust
BitSight
Apptega
SecurityScorecard
Drata
socketify.py Open PosternOpen Postern's answer:
Design partner cohort (announcing soon)
Open Postern's answer:
The primary audience is MSPs and IT service providers (10โ100 employees) managing security and vendor risk on behalf of SMB clients (typically 5โ100 employees per client). Secondary audiences include SMB IT administrators handling vendor risk in-house, and vCISOs and fractional security consultants who need a tool that scales across multiple client engagements without per-seat enterprise pricing.
Open Postern's answer:
Open Postern is vendor risk monitoring built natively for MSPs and IT agencies serving SMB clients, with a proper Agencies โ Clients โ Vendors model and role-based team access from day one. It combines CVE tracking, CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities exposure, SSL/TLS health, DNS posture, and AI-curated breach news into a single 0โ100 risk score per vendor โ work that otherwise requires three separate tools or a six-figure enterprise platform.
Open Postern's answer:
Most vendor risk platforms โ UpGuard, SecurityScorecard, BitSight โ are priced for Fortune 500 procurement teams and gate access behind multi-month sales cycles. Open Postern delivers the same core continuous monitoring capabilities at a price point an MSP serving 20 SMB clients can actually afford, with a free tier that's genuinely usable and a sub-5-minute path from signup to a first actionable risk report. No demos required, no procurement process, no 12-month minimums.
Open Postern's answer:
Open Postern started as a nights-and-weekends project aimed at a gap in the vendor risk monitoring market: small and mid-sized businesses get hit by vendor breaches just as often as enterprises, but the tools designed to protect them, UpGuard, BitSight, and SecurityScorecard, are priced for buyers ten times their size. Once the product had multi-tenant Agencies and Clients working, it was clear that the real operators of vendor risk for SMBs are MSPs, not the SMBs themselves. Open Postern is now positioned as the vendor risk platform built for the MSP channel... one that an MSP can resell to clients as a recurring service line without taking a margin hit.
Open Postern's answer:
Next.js (App Router), TypeScript, React, and Tailwind CSS on the frontend; Node.js with PostgreSQL on the backend; deployed on Vercel. Vendor risk data sources include the NIST National Vulnerability Database (NVD), the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalogue, SSL/TLS scanners, DNS configuration checks, HTTP security header analysis, and AI-powered breach news aggregation.
Based on our record, socketify.py seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
These "benchmarks" are useless, they're not testing anything real world except the performance of uWebsockets. There are copy errors all over the place. And then an advertisement: https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py#briefcase-comme... Is this a professional framework that produces proper, real-world benchmarks and... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
After starting the project called socketify.py at https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py, I got pretty good results and reviews, but many people asked if socketify.py could be used to create a WSGI and ASGI server. WSGI and ASGI have a lot of overhead, that's is why I choose not to use them in the first place, but adding an ASGI and WSGI server allows a lot of code already written to run faster! Source: over 3 years ago