Snapdrop Reviews

1. Jeff

   almost 4 years ago
   A Complete waste of time from a 4 decade mac pro user

   Takes forever to send even small video files with high speed internet. Horrible documentation for transferring instructions. No option in the app menu to choose a destination folder. There's no way to compress all of your videos on an android to send to the Mac, even though that is suggested in their "features". And not 1 single video could I find in 2 hours of google searches that answered these questions. For a company touting such "ease of use", as a 40 year mac user, this was another waste of time app. If the company would like to contact me and answer these questions, if it is indeed an "easy, reliable app", I will gladly help them make a video that actually walks people through the problems I have encountered.

2. Gar

   over 4 years ago
   Excellent way to share a folder with multiple files to another computer

   SnapDrop does an excellent job in sharing multiple files to another computer. Just zip/compress a folder with multiple files and select that zipped folder to send to the other computer or mobile device.

   🏁 Competitors: AirDrop by Apple

runc Reviews

Snapdrop mentions (232)

• How to Transfer Files Between iOS and Android in 2025

  Snapdrop Snapdrop is mainly a browser-based service rather than a native mobile app, though some unofficial wrappers exist. It requires a modern web browser and uses WebRTC for peer-to-peer file transfers. Because it runs in a browser, an internet connection may be necessary. Snapdrop works best for sharing small files, while larger transfers may be slower due to browser constraints. The service is free and does... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

• Query Apple's FindMy Network with Python

  If the constraint is that you don't want to install any software, there are a bunch of these web based AirDrop clones, besides the ones mentioned here are two more: https://pairdrop.net/ https://snapdrop.net/ I've tried PairDrop, it works well. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• Send: Open-source fork of Firefox Send

  I love Snapdrop [0] for that use case, since it doesn't require downloading/installing an app. [0] https://snapdrop.net/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

• Sharedrop: Easy P2P file transfer powered by WebRTC – inspired by Apple AirDrop

  > My fave is https://snapdrop.net it's so funny how everyone have a favorite. They all use standardized hacks on top of hacks, just because ISP do not want to let you serve content and will fight for NAT, which is their only line of defense from everyone else messing with their precious IGMP multicast hacks so they can subsidize their TV business on your internet bill. it's all so funny. But the best joke is how... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

• Ask HN: Those who use an Android and macOS, how do you manage sync?

  Https://snapdrop.net/ is a great solution that unlike KDE doesn't require installation. Along with https://webwormhole.io/ they are my go to for transferring assets between systems. Both use WebRTC. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

runc mentions (11)

• Setup multi node kubernetes cluster using kubeadm

  For kubeadm , kubetlet , kubectl should same version package in this lab I used v1.31 to have 1.31.7 References: Https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/networking/ports-and-protocols/ Https://kubernetes.io/docs/setup/production-environment/tools/kubeadm/install-kubeadm/ Https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/releases/... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Comparing 3 Docker container runtimes - Runc, gVisor and Kata Containers

  Previously I wrote about the multiple variants of Docker and also the dependencies behind the Docker daemon. One of the dependencies was the container runtime called runc. That is what creates the usual containers we are all familiar with. When you use Docker, this is the default runtime, which is understandable since it was started by Docker, Inc. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

• You run containers, not dockers - Discussing Docker variants, components and versioning

  Now we have dockerd which uses containerd, but containerd will not create containers directly. It needs a runtime and the default runtime is runc, but that can be changed. Containerd actually doesn't have to know the parameters of the runtime. There is a shim process between containerd and runc, so containerd knows the parameters of the shim, and the shim knows the parameters of runc or other runtimes. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

• US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in Software Products

  It's interesting that, in light of things like this, you still see large software companies adding support for new components written in non-memory safe languages (e.g. C) As an example Red Hat OpenShift added support for crun(https://github.com/containers/crun), which is written in C as an alternative to runc, which is written in Go( - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

• Why did the Krustlet project die?

  Yeah, runtimeClass lets you specify which CRI plugin you want based on what you have available. Here's an example from the containerd documentation - you could have one node that can run containers under standard runc, gvisor, kata containers, or WASM. Without runtimeClass, you'd need either some form of custom solution or four differently configured nodes to run those different runtimes. That's how krustlet did... Source: over 3 years ago