
ITarian
Kenna
Patch Manager
Kandji
Jamf Pro
SolarWinds RMM
Avast Business Patch Management
Software to manage your Azure, SCCM and VMware or HyperV environments, designed with the Administrator in mind. Let's make Administration easy.

ngrok
LocalXpose
sish
Pagekite
Pinggy.io
zrok
Portmap.io
Instantly share your localhost environment!

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, localhost.run seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 42 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | smikar.com | localhost.run |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
SnaPatch is best suited for medium to large enterprises that utilize Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager and are seeking to enhance their patch management processes. It is particularly beneficial for organizations that require regular updates and security compliance but wish to minimize manual intervention and the risk of human error in patch deployment.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
SnaPatch Patch Management Add-On for SCCM
No localhost.run videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using SnaPatch and localhost.run. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


We have no reviews of SnaPatch yet. Be the first one to post
localhost.run is very similar to Serveo but with less features. In fact, as far as I can tell, it only does 1 thing: expose your local web server to the web with a public URL. And it does that well enough for me.
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking SnaPatch since Mar 2021.
- This asciinema: https://asciinema.org/a/674501?t=111 Any unix machine (currently only fedora and debian based distro dependencies are auto installed. Passwordless sudo recommended) with tmux if you run this ssh command you’ll get a... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Localhost.run - Simple hosted SSH option. Supports custom domains for a cost. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Localhost.run — Expose locally running servers over a tunnel to a public URL. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
When comparing SnaPatch and localhost.run, you can also consider the following products.


ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.
Compare ngrok to SnaPatch or localhost.run:

Kenna is a risk intelligence & vulnerability platform that enables InfoSec teams to prioritize and remediate vulnerabilities faster.
Compare Kenna to SnaPatch or localhost.run:

Your network without the IT work. Radically simple, always-on tunneling service for mission-critical applications.
Compare LocalXpose to SnaPatch or localhost.run:

Patch Manager is a platform that allows users to manage all the patches present in the system and applications to reduce any kind of risks.
Compare Patch Manager to SnaPatch or localhost.run:

An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.
Compare sish to SnaPatch or localhost.run: