Smell Dating VS cppq

• Unique Matching Method
  Smell Dating uses natural body scent to match individuals, offering a unique and scientifically-backed method that goes beyond superficial online profiles.
• Biological Compatibility
  By focusing on scent, Smell Dating potentially matches individuals based on biological and pheromonal compatibility, which could lead to more successful relationships.
• Novelty and Curiosity
  The unusual concept of smell-based dating piques curiosity and attracts those looking for something different from traditional dating platforms.
• Detachment from Physical Appearance
  Smell Dating prioritizes olfactory senses over visual cues, encouraging users to focus less on physical appearance and more on chemical attraction.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited User Base
  As a niche dating service, Smell Dating may have a smaller pool of participants compared to mainstream dating apps, limiting the number of potential matches.
• Unconventional Approach
  The concept may not appeal to everyone, as it requires users to be open to an unconventional and less common method of finding partners.
• Hygiene Concerns
  The process of exchanging odor samples can raise hygiene issues or discomfort for some participants, making it less appealing.
• Lack of Immediate Interaction
  The time taken to collect, send, and process smells might delay initial interactions, unlike digital matches which happen instantly.

• Lightweight C++ implementation
  cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
• Redis-backed reliability
  Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
• Inspired by proven design (asynq)
  The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
• Native integration for C++ projects
  For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
• Open source and inspectable
  Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited maturity and battle-testing
  Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
• Smaller community and ecosystem
  Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
• Documentation gaps
  As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
• C++ build and dependency complexity
  Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
• Fewer built-in features and tooling
  cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.

No analysis of Smell Dating yet.

WHOOPI ATTACKS Ben Carson, SMELL DATING, GOLDEN GIRL sued... || My 2 Cents #2

No cppq videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• Ask HN: Why are dating apps so bad? Why hasn't anyone made a good one?

  Random thoughts: - are there any measurable factors indicating someone is a good match? Okcupid claimed to match people with others who gave similar answers to their questions, but I had some fates with a high match % and still no... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• Smell You Later: The Weird Science of How Sweat Attracts

  Reminds me of: https://smell.dating/. - Source: Hacker News / about 5 years ago

Tracking cppq since Nov 2022.