Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

slstatus VS xfce-panel

Compare slstatus VS xfce-panel and see what are their differences

slstatus logo slstatus

slstatus is a status monitor for window managers that use WM_NAME or stdin to fill the status bar.

xfce-panel logo xfce-panel

Xfce componet to switch between opened windows, launch applications, switch workspaces and menu plugins to browse applications or directories.
  • slstatus Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-06-30
  • xfce-panel Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-06-30

slstatus features and specs

  • Lightweight
    slstatus is designed to be minimalistic and lightweight, which makes it efficient in terms of resource usage. It's ideal for users who want a simple status monitor without unnecessary bloat.
  • Customizable
    Users can customize slstatus to display various system information. It allows for a good degree of flexibility in how the status bar appears.
  • Integration with dwm
    slstatus is part of the Suckless Tools suite and integrates well with dwm (Dynamic Window Manager), making it a preferred choice for users in the Suckless ecosystem looking for seamless compatibility.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source tool, slstatus allows users to view, modify, and contribute to its source code. This transparency is valued by users who prefer open-source solutions.

Possible disadvantages of slstatus

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more feature-rich status monitors, slstatus has a limited set of features. Users looking for advanced functionality might find it lacking.
  • Manual Configuration
    Configuration of slstatus requires editing the source code and recompiling, which can be inconvenient and time-consuming, especially for users not familiar with programming.
  • Unix-specific
    slstatus is primarily designed for Unix-like operating systems and may not be suitable for users on other platforms.

xfce-panel features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Xfce-panel is designed to be lightweight, making it an ideal choice for systems with limited resources or users looking for a fast and efficient desktop environment.
  • Highly Configurable
    Users can easily configure the xfce-panel to suit their needs by adding, removing, or rearranging applets and components.
  • Plugin Support
    Xfce-panel supports numerous plugins, allowing users to extend its functionality with additional features like weather updates, system monitoring, and more.
  • Stable and Reliable
    Xfce-panel is known for its stability and has a long history of reliable service, making it a dependable component for daily use.
  • Consistent User Experience
    The panel offers a consistent and intuitive user experience that aligns with the overall design philosophy of the XFCE desktop environment.

Possible disadvantages of xfce-panel

  • Limited Eye Candy
    Xfce-panel is designed with performance in mind, leading to a more simplistic visual appearance which may not appeal to users who prefer more visually rich environments.
  • Less Modern Look
    Compared to other desktop environments, the xfce-panel might appear somewhat dated, which may not be ideal for users seeking a modern aesthetic.
  • Fewer Advanced Features
    While it covers the basics well, xfce-panel might lack some of the advanced features found in panels from other desktop environments like GNOME or KDE.
  • Limited Development Speed
    The development pace of Xfce-panel can be slower compared to other popular desktop panels, which might delay the introduction of new features.

slstatus videos

More dwm and slstatus customization

More videos:

  • Review - artixlinux compile on boot dwm slstatus dmenu

xfce-panel videos

No xfce-panel videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to slstatus and xfce-panel)
App Launcher
49 49%
51% 51
Productivity
49 49%
51% 51
Note Taking
49 49%
51% 51
LMS
50 50%
50% 50

User comments

Share your experience with using slstatus and xfce-panel. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing slstatus and xfce-panel, you can also consider the following products

Yambar - Modular status panel for X11 and Wayland, inspired by polybar.

wf-shell - wf-shell is a repository which contains the various components needed to built a fully functional DE based around wayfire. Currently it has only a GTK-based panel and background client.

ironbar - Customisable Wayland gtk bar written in Rust.

Waybar - Highly customizable Wayland bar for Sway and Wlroots based compositors. :v: :tada: - GitHub - Alexays/Waybar: Highly customizable Wayland bar for Sway and Wlroots based compositors.

nwg-panel - Nwg-panel is a GTK3-based panel for sway and Hyprland Wayland compositors. The panel is equipped with a graphical configuration program that frees the user from the need to manually edit configuration files.

Quickshell - A Flexible toolkit for making desktop shells with QtQuick, targeting Wayland and X11.