Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

slstatus VS Oatbar

Compare slstatus VS Oatbar and see what are their differences

slstatus logo slstatus

slstatus is a status monitor for window managers that use WM_NAME or stdin to fill the status bar.

Oatbar logo Oatbar

The motivation for creation of oatbar was to extend on the idea of Unix-way for toolbars. Inspired by i3bar which consumes a JSON stream that controls it's appearance, we take this idea much further without becoming a DIY widget toolkit.
  • slstatus Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-06-30
Not present

slstatus features and specs

  • Lightweight
    slstatus is designed to be minimalistic and lightweight, which makes it efficient in terms of resource usage. It's ideal for users who want a simple status monitor without unnecessary bloat.
  • Customizable
    Users can customize slstatus to display various system information. It allows for a good degree of flexibility in how the status bar appears.
  • Integration with dwm
    slstatus is part of the Suckless Tools suite and integrates well with dwm (Dynamic Window Manager), making it a preferred choice for users in the Suckless ecosystem looking for seamless compatibility.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source tool, slstatus allows users to view, modify, and contribute to its source code. This transparency is valued by users who prefer open-source solutions.

Possible disadvantages of slstatus

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more feature-rich status monitors, slstatus has a limited set of features. Users looking for advanced functionality might find it lacking.
  • Manual Configuration
    Configuration of slstatus requires editing the source code and recompiling, which can be inconvenient and time-consuming, especially for users not familiar with programming.
  • Unix-specific
    slstatus is primarily designed for Unix-like operating systems and may not be suitable for users on other platforms.

Oatbar features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Oatbar offers a clean and intuitive interface that's easy to navigate, making it accessible for users of all technical backgrounds.
  • Comprehensive Features
    The app provides a wide range of tools and functionalities ideal for organizing, tracking, and managing diverse tasks efficiently.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Oatbar is designed to work seamlessly across different platforms, ensuring users can access their information on various devices.
  • Customization Options
    Users can customize their experience by adjusting settings and preferences to fit their specific needs and workflows.
  • Strong Customer Support
    The app offers robust customer support, providing users with timely assistance and resources to resolve issues.

Possible disadvantages of Oatbar

  • Pricing Structure
    Oatbar's pricing might be higher compared to similar applications, which can be a barrier for cost-sensitive users.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, new users might require time to fully understand and utilize all available features effectively.
  • Limited Offline Functionality
    Some users may find the app's offline capabilities limited, which could affect productivity without a reliable internet connection.
  • Dependency on Internet
    As a cloud-based application, Oatbar heavily relies on internet connectivity for syncing data, which might be a drawback in areas with poor access.

slstatus videos

More dwm and slstatus customization

More videos:

  • Review - artixlinux compile on boot dwm slstatus dmenu

Oatbar videos

#shorts #oatbar #nutrition #review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to slstatus and Oatbar)
App Launcher
53 53%
47% 47
Note Taking
49 49%
51% 51
Productivity
49 49%
51% 51
LMS
42 42%
58% 58

User comments

Share your experience with using slstatus and Oatbar. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing slstatus and Oatbar, you can also consider the following products

Yambar - Modular status panel for X11 and Wayland, inspired by polybar.

150 ChatGPT 4.0 prompts for SEO - Unlock the power of AI to boost your website's visibility.

wf-shell - wf-shell is a repository which contains the various components needed to built a fully functional DE based around wayfire. Currently it has only a GTK-based panel and background client.

Waybar - Highly customizable Wayland bar for Sway and Wlroots based compositors. :v: :tada: - GitHub - Alexays/Waybar: Highly customizable Wayland bar for Sway and Wlroots based compositors.

Awesome ChatGPT Prompts - Game Genie for ChatGPT

nwg-panel - Nwg-panel is a GTK3-based panel for sway and Hyprland Wayland compositors. The panel is equipped with a graphical configuration program that frees the user from the need to manually edit configuration files.