Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

slstatus VS ADeskBar

Compare slstatus VS ADeskBar and see what are their differences

slstatus logo slstatus

slstatus is a status monitor for window managers that use WM_NAME or stdin to fill the status bar.

ADeskBar logo ADeskBar

a lightweight application launcher for Openbox, written in Python and GTK.
  • slstatus Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-06-30
  • ADeskBar Landing page
    Landing page //
    2025-06-30

slstatus features and specs

  • Lightweight
    slstatus is designed to be minimalistic and lightweight, which makes it efficient in terms of resource usage. It's ideal for users who want a simple status monitor without unnecessary bloat.
  • Customizable
    Users can customize slstatus to display various system information. It allows for a good degree of flexibility in how the status bar appears.
  • Integration with dwm
    slstatus is part of the Suckless Tools suite and integrates well with dwm (Dynamic Window Manager), making it a preferred choice for users in the Suckless ecosystem looking for seamless compatibility.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source tool, slstatus allows users to view, modify, and contribute to its source code. This transparency is valued by users who prefer open-source solutions.

Possible disadvantages of slstatus

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more feature-rich status monitors, slstatus has a limited set of features. Users looking for advanced functionality might find it lacking.
  • Manual Configuration
    Configuration of slstatus requires editing the source code and recompiling, which can be inconvenient and time-consuming, especially for users not familiar with programming.
  • Unix-specific
    slstatus is primarily designed for Unix-like operating systems and may not be suitable for users on other platforms.

ADeskBar features and specs

  • Customizability
    ADeskBar offers a high degree of customizability, allowing users to configure the appearance and behavior to suit their preferences. This includes adjusting size, position, and the addition of various applets.
  • Resource Efficiency
    ADeskBar is designed to be lightweight and efficient, making it an excellent choice for systems with limited resources. It provides a functional desktop bar without demanding significant CPU or memory usage.
  • Plugin Support
    The application supports plugins, which extends its functionality. Users can add plugins to increase the capabilities of the bar, making it more versatile in handling different tasks.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, ADeskBar allows users to view, modify, and distribute the code. This encourages community contributions and ensures greater trust and transparency in the software.

Possible disadvantages of ADeskBar

  • Limited Documentation
    Users might find the available documentation to be sparse or incomplete, making it challenging to take full advantage of all the features without some trial and error.
  • Compatibility Issues
    As with many open-source projects, there can be compatibility issues with newer versions of desktop environments or distributions, requiring users to troubleshoot or wait for updates.
  • Development Activity
    The project might not have as active development as some other alternatives, possibly resulting in slower updates and fewer new features over time.
  • User Interface Design
    While functional, the user interface of ADeskBar might not be as polished or visually appealing as some proprietary options, which could be a downside for users looking for a slick, modern appearance.

slstatus videos

More dwm and slstatus customization

More videos:

  • Review - artixlinux compile on boot dwm slstatus dmenu

ADeskBar videos

No ADeskBar videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to slstatus and ADeskBar)
App Launcher
58 58%
42% 42
Productivity
58 58%
42% 42
Note Taking
58 58%
42% 42
LMS
50 50%
50% 50

User comments

Share your experience with using slstatus and ADeskBar. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing slstatus and ADeskBar, you can also consider the following products

Yambar - Modular status panel for X11 and Wayland, inspired by polybar.

wf-shell - wf-shell is a repository which contains the various components needed to built a fully functional DE based around wayfire. Currently it has only a GTK-based panel and background client.

xfce-panel - Xfce componet to switch between opened windows, launch applications, switch workspaces and menu plugins to browse applications or directories.

Waybar - Highly customizable Wayland bar for Sway and Wlroots based compositors. :v: :tada: - GitHub - Alexays/Waybar: Highly customizable Wayland bar for Sway and Wlroots based compositors.

Quickshell - A Flexible toolkit for making desktop shells with QtQuick, targeting Wayland and X11.

nwg-panel - Nwg-panel is a GTK3-based panel for sway and Hyprland Wayland compositors. The panel is equipped with a graphical configuration program that frees the user from the need to manually edit configuration files.