Software Alternatives & Startups

SlickEdit VS iTerm2

Compare SlickEdit VS iTerm2 and see what are their differences

SlickEdit

SlickEdit is a cross-platform, multi-language source code editor text editor that allows programmers to developer in over 40 languages on seven platforms.

Rating
0 reviews
iTerm2

A terminal emulator for macOS that does amazing things.

Rating
4.0 · 1 review
Pricing
Open source
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, iTerm2 seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 119 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 119
Text Editors popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
126 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

SlickEdit
iTerm2
Website slickedit.com iterm2.com
Pricing —
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

SlickEdit 7 features
iTerm2 6 features
  • Versatility
    SlickEdit supports over 70 programming languages, making it an extremely versatile editor for multi-language development environments.
  • Customization
    It offers extensive customization options, including customizable key bindings, menus, toolbars, and a powerful macro language for automation.
  • Speed
    The editor is optimized for speed and performance, even when working with large files and complex projects.
  • Code Navigation
    Enhanced code browsing features, such as symbol referencing, syntax expansion, and context tagging, make navigating and reviewing code more efficient.
  • Debugging Support
    It includes robust debugging features like integrated debuggers for various languages, which streamline the debugging process.
  • Cross-Platform
    SlickEdit is available on Windows, macOS, and Linux, allowing developers to maintain a consistent workflow across different operating systems.
  • Integrated Version Control
    Supports version control systems like Git, Subversion, and Mercurial, providing seamless integration for code management.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    Unlike many other text editors and IDEs, SlickEdit is a paid product, which could be a barrier for independent developers and small teams.
  • Complexity
    Its extensive feature set can be overwhelming for new users, requiring a steep learning curve to fully utilize its capabilities.
  • User Interface
    Some users find the user interface to be less modern and intuitive compared to other contemporary editors and IDEs.
  • Limited Plugins
    Compared to other popular editors like VS Code or IntelliJ IDEA, SlickEdit has a limited ecosystem of third-party plugins and extensions.
  • Resource Intensive
    Despite being known for performance, some users report that it can be resource-intensive, particularly when loading large projects.
  • Versatility
    iTerm2 supports a wide range of features such as split panes, multiple tab management, and hotkey-activated terminal windows, making it highly versatile for different workflows.
  • Customization
    Offers extensive customization options, including themes, color schemes, and key bindings, allowing users to tailor the terminal to their preferences.
  • Advanced Features
    Includes advanced functionality like instant replay, which allows users to rewind their terminal session, and integration with automation tools like AppleScript.
  • Performance
    Designed to be efficient and responsive, ensuring it performs well even with multiple sessions and tabs open simultaneously.
  • Integrations
    Seamless integration with macOS features such as native notifications, fullscreen mode, and support for external editors.
  • Community Support
    Active community and comprehensive documentation, which can be very helpful for troubleshooting and learning advanced configurations.

Possible disadvantages

  • Mac-Only
    iTerm2 is exclusive to macOS, which means users on other operating systems cannot utilize its features.
  • Complexity
    The sheer number of features and customization options can be overwhelming for beginners, requiring a learning curve to utilize efficiently.
  • System Resource Usage
    iTerm2 may consume more system resources compared to simpler terminal emulators, which could be a concern on lower-end hardware.
  • Update Frequency
    Occasional updates can introduce bugs or unexpected behavior, requiring users to adjust settings or find workarounds.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

SlickEdit
iTerm2

Overall verdict

  • SlickEdit is a powerful and highly versatile code editor, particularly favored by developers who require extensive customization and advanced features. Its steep learning curve and premium pricing might be a drawback for some, but for those who need its specialized capabilities, it's often deemed worth the investment.

Why this product is good

  • SlickEdit is recognized for its robust features tailored for professional developers. It offers extensive language support, powerful debugging tools, customizable workspaces, and efficient code navigation. The editor is designed to handle large codebases with ease and provides advanced editing capabilities like macro scripting and version control integration.

Recommended for

    SlickEdit is ideal for professional developers and software engineers who work on complex projects and large codebases. It's particularly beneficial for those who need support for multiple languages, advanced debugging tools, and customizable environments. It's also suitable for developers who value speed and efficiency in their editing workflow.

Overall verdict

  • iTerm2 is regarded as an excellent terminal emulator for macOS due to its robust feature set and usability, making it a top choice for power users.

Why this product is good

  • iTerm2 is often praised for its advanced features, customization options, and efficiency that enhance productivity for users who work with the command line frequently. It offers split panes, hotkey window, undo close, instant replay, and a highly configurable interface that caters to power users, making it a versatile tool for developers and system administrators.

Recommended for

  • Developers and programmers who need a highly customizable terminal.
  • System administrators who require powerful scripting and automation capabilities.
  • Users who frequently work with command-line interfaces and require multiple sessions handled efficiently.
  • Anyone seeking an enhanced, feature-rich alternative to the default macOS terminal.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

SlickEdit 4 videos + Add
iTerm2 1 video + Add

SlickEdit - Why Should I Use SlickEdit?

More videos

  • - SlickEdit - Emulations
  • - SlickEdit - How to Orgainze the Projects Tool Window - Directory View
  • - SlickEdit - How to Use the Class Browser

Customizing iterm2 with ZSH and PowerLevel9k | Z shell Tutorial

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
SlickEdit
iTerm2
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
IDE
0% 0%
0% 0%
SSH
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using SlickEdit and iTerm2. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

SlickEdit no reviews yet
iTerm2 4.0 · 1 review

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

SlickEdit 0 mentions
iTerm2 119 mentions

Tracking SlickEdit since Mar 2021.

View more

Alternatives to SlickEdit and iTerm2

When comparing SlickEdit and iTerm2, you can also consider the following products.