skipfish VS Yang

Which is more popular?

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

	skipfish	Yang
Website	code.google.com	rbcafe.com
Listed in	Monitoring Tools Security Network & Admin Web Application Security +1	Security Monitoring Tools Cyber Security Web Application Security +1

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

skipfish 5 features

Yang 0 features

High-Speed Scanning
Skipfish is designed to be fast, performing HTTP connections and handling multiple requests concurrently, which can significantly reduce the time it takes to scan a web application.
Recursive Crawling
Skipfish employs recursive crawling and wordlists to discover hidden files and directories, providing a more comprehensive assessment of the target web application.
Effective Detection
The tool is capable of identifying a wide range of security issues such as SQL injection, XSS, and other common web vulnerabilities through fuzzing techniques.
Minimal False Positives
Skipfish is known for producing results with fewer false positives compared to other automated scanners, leading to more reliable outputs.
Open Source
Being open source, Skipfish allows users to inspect, modify, and improve upon the source code according to their needs.

Possible disadvantages

Complexity for Beginners
The tool can be complex for beginners due to a lack of a graphical user interface (GUI) and the need for command-line proficiency, making it less approachable for those new to web security scanning.
Limited Support
As an archived project on Google Code, Skipfish no longer receives updates or official support, which could be a limitation for users looking for the latest security testing features.
Resource Intensive
The high speed and intensive scanning techniques may consume significant bandwidth and resources, potentially impacting the performance of the network and systems being tested.
Lack of Detailed Reporting
The reporting features of Skipfish are relatively basic and might not meet the needs of users who require extensive details and customization in their security reports.
Potential for Overload
Due to its aggressive scanning nature, there is a risk of overwhelming the target server, especially if not configured properly beforehand.

No features have been listed yet.

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

skipfish 3 videos + Add

Yang 3 videos + Add

Penetration Test with Skipfish

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100

skipfish

Yang

82% 82%

18% 18%

80% 80%

20% 20%

67% 67%

33% 33%

100% 100%

0% 0%

Share your experience with using skipfish and Yang. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

When comparing skipfish and Yang, you can also consider the following products.