Sizzy VS Ember-cli

• Browser Synchronization
  Sizzy allows developers to test their web applications simultaneously across multiple devices and viewports, keeping them in sync with one another. This feature helps ensure a consistent user experience across different devices.
• Development Tools Integration
  Sizzy provides seamless integration with popular web development tools and browsers, making it easier for developers to debug and test their applications without switching between different environments.
• Customizable Viewports
  Users can customize the viewport sizes to match various devices. This flexibility helps developers test how their application looks and behaves on a wide range of screens and resolutions.
• Live Reload
  The live reload feature automatically updates the view as developers make changes to the code, improving development speed and reducing the time spent on manual refreshes.
• Collaboration Features
  Sizzy offers collaboration features that allow teams to share their screen setups and sync states with team members, improving communication and feedback during the development process.

Possible disadvantages

• Subscription Cost
  Sizzy operates on a subscription-based pricing model, which might be a barrier for individual developers or small teams with limited budgets.
• System Resource Intensive
  Running multiple viewports simultaneously can be resource-intensive and may slow down the development machine, especially if it lacks robust hardware specifications.
• Learning Curve
  New users might encounter a learning curve to fully utilize all the features Sizzy offers, particularly if they are accustomed to traditional development environments.
• Dependency on Internet Connection
  Some features of Sizzy may require an active internet connection. This dependency could be a limitation in environments with unstable or limited internet access.
• Limited Offline Capabilities
  Sizzy's functionality is somewhat limited when offline, reducing its effectiveness for developers who prefer or need to work in environments with intermittent internet access.

• Convention over Configuration
  Ember-cli enforces strong conventions for file structure, naming, and project organization, which reduces decision fatigue and makes it easier for developers to jump between different Ember projects with minimal onboarding time.
• Built-in Tooling
  Comes with a robust set of built-in tools including a development server, testing framework integration (QUnit), asset compilation, and live reload, reducing the need to manually configure and integrate third-party build tools.
• Addon Ecosystem
  Ember-cli supports a rich ecosystem of addons that can be easily installed and integrated into projects, allowing developers to extend functionality without reinventing the wheel for common features.
• Blueprints and Generators
  Provides powerful generator commands (blueprints) that scaffold components, routes, models, and other application pieces quickly, speeding up development and ensuring consistency across the codebase.
• Stable Long-term Support
  Ember-cli follows Ember's release cycle with clear LTS (Long Term Support) versions, providing stability and predictability for teams maintaining large applications over time.

Possible disadvantages

• Steep Learning Curve
  The strict conventions and unique architecture of Ember-cli can be difficult for newcomers to learn, especially those coming from more flexible frameworks or with no prior Ember experience.
• Smaller Community Compared to Alternatives
  Compared to tools like Vite, Webpack, or CRA used with React/Vue, Ember-cli has a smaller community and ecosystem, which can mean fewer third-party resources, tutorials, and community-driven troubleshooting.
• Build Performance
  For large applications, Ember-cli's build process can become slow, and while improvements have been made with embroider, some developers still report slower build times compared to more modern bundlers.
• Rigid Structure
  The opinionated nature of Ember-cli, while helpful for consistency, can feel restrictive for developers who prefer more flexibility in structuring their applications or adopting non-standard patterns.
• Migration Complexity
  Upgrading between major Ember-cli versions or migrating to newer build systems like Embroider can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for older or heavily customized applications.

Should every Frontend Developer own this software? Checking out 'Sizzy'

More videos

No Ember-cli videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• Polypane, The browser for ambitious web developers

  Seems quite similar to https://sizzy.co/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• But can your browser do this? :)

  Just so you know Sizzy exists as well and has been around for a while so you would competing with them as well. Source: almost 3 years ago

• Simulate your website across many devices all in the same browser tab! Proof of concept for a micro saas I'm building in public :)

  I would like to introduce you to Sizzy. Source: over 3 years ago

View more

• Help! Why does chrome console inner text and my program inner text not return the same values? (spent nearly the whole day trying to extract an element). Turned to reddit as its always had the best community. Any help is MASSIVELY appreciated. Puppeteer!!

  The webpage is LinkedIn.com. While this isn’t a framework, I know that are using https://cli.emberjs.com/release/. Source: about 5 years ago