Which is more popular?
Based on our record, sish seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 17 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | github.com | eazework.com |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of EazeHR yet.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using sish and EazeHR. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Sish is an SSH-based solution that is simple to deploy and use. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
We’re actually using Unix sockets as the underlying transport layer for this. We’re also not using sshd, we custom wrote our own daemon that’s entire job is tunneling. If you’re curious about this, you can find the project here:... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Sish - Open source ngrok/serveo alternative. SSH-based but uses a custom server written in Go. Supports WebSocket tunneling. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Tracking EazeHR since Mar 2021.
When comparing sish and EazeHR, you can also consider the following products.

ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.
Compare ngrok to sish or EazeHR:


Expose your local PC to Internet from behind firewall and without real IP address
Compare Portmap.io to sish or EazeHR:

Your network without the IT work. Radically simple, always-on tunneling service for mission-critical applications.
Compare LocalXpose to sish or EazeHR:

