sish VS corsproxy

• Open Source
  sish is open-source, allowing users to inspect, modify, and contribute to the project's codebase.
• Self-Hosted
  Users can host their own instance of sish, giving them complete control over their tunneling service and associated data.
• Simple Setup
  The installation and setup process for sish is straightforward, requiring minimal configuration to get started.
• Custom Subdomains
  sish allows users to utilize custom subdomains for their tunnels, enhancing branding and easier access.
• Security Features
  Built-in support for TLS and authentication options, ensuring that tunnels are secure and accessible only to authorized users.
• Portability
  sish supports multiple platforms, allowing it to be used in various environments such as local development, testing, or cloud deployment.

Possible disadvantages

• Self-Management
  Users need to manage their own server and configurations, which can require additional maintenance and oversight compared to managed services.
• Resource Consumption
  Hosting your own instance of sish requires computational resources, which could be a con if the service is heavily used.
• Complexity for Non-Developers
  Non-developers might find the setup and maintenance process challenging without prior experience in server management and configuration.
• Limited Community Support
  As a niche project, sish may not have as large of a community or as many resources available for troubleshooting as more popular alternatives.
• No Built-In Analytics
  Unlike some other tunneling services, sish does not provide built-in analytics or monitoring tools, requiring users to implement their own solutions.

• Cross-Domain Requests
  corsproxy enables making cross-domain requests easily by acting as a proxy server, which helps in overcoming the limitations posed by the same-origin policy in web browsers.
• Open Source
  Being open source, corsproxy allows users to examine, modify, and enhance the source code according to their needs, providing flexibility and adaptability.
• Ease of Use
  The setup and configuration of corsproxy is straightforward, making it accessible even to developers with minimal setup experience.
• Configurability
  corsproxy provides options to customize headers and CORS settings, allowing more control over the requests and responses.

Possible disadvantages

• Security Risks
  Running a proxy server like corsproxy can introduce security vulnerabilities if not properly managed, as it may expose internal APIs to outsiders.
• Performance Overhead
  Forwarding requests through an additional server layer can introduce latency and reduce the overall performance of requests.
• Maintenance
  Managing and maintaining an additional service like corsproxy requires additional resources and oversight to ensure reliability and uptime.
• Limited Scalability
  corsproxy might not be suitable for high-volume traffic as it is primarily a simple tool, not optimized for large-scale applications.

No analysis of corsproxy yet.

• Best Ngrok Alternatives in 2025

  Sish is an SSH-based solution that is simple to deploy and use. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

• Pico.sh (The ultimate SSH powered services for developers)

  We’re actually using Unix sockets as the underlying transport layer for this. We’re also not using sshd, we custom wrote our own daemon that’s entire job is tunneling. If you’re curious about this, you can find the project here:... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• List of ngrok/Cloudflare Tunnel alternatives and other tunneling software and services. Focus on self-hosting.

  Sish - Open source ngrok/serveo alternative. SSH-based but uses a custom server written in Go. Supports WebSocket tunneling. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

View more

Tracking corsproxy since Mar 2021.