Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

simplehttp VS Underscore.js

Compare simplehttp VS Underscore.js and see what are their differences

simplehttp

A family of libraries and daemons for building scalable web infrastructure.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Underscore.js

Underscore is a utility-belt library for JavaScript that provides a lot of the functional...

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
Modelence
Create production-ready applications with zero code sponsored

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Underscore.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 24 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 24
Development Tools popularity
3% vs 97%
alternatives listed
25 vs 217

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

simplehttp
Underscore.js
Website github.com underscorejs.org
Pricing —
Open source
Listed in
Development Tools Javascript UI Libraries JavaScript Framework UI +1
Development Tools Javascript UI Libraries JavaScript Framework UI +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

simplehttp 3 features
Underscore.js 5 features
  • Easy to Use
    Simplehttp is designed to be easy to use, with minimal setup and a straightforward API that makes it accessible for developers who need to quickly implement HTTP servers and clients.
  • Lightweight
    The library is lightweight, which means it has a small footprint and is suitable for applications where minimizing resource usage is important.
  • Fast Setup
    It allows for rapid deployment and configuration, enabling developers to get an HTTP server up and running quickly without dealing with complex configurations.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Functionality
    Being simple and lightweight, simplehttp may lack some advanced features and flexibility compared to more comprehensive HTTP libraries.
  • Community and Support
    As it is not one of the most popular HTTP libraries, it may have a smaller community, which can result in less community-driven support and fewer third-party resources.
  • Documentation
    The documentation, while sufficient for basic use, might not be as extensive or detailed as larger, more widely-used libraries, which could pose challenges for new users.
  • Utility Functions
    Underscore.js provides a wealth of utility functions for common tasks such as map, reduce, filter, and more, making it easier to perform operations on arrays, objects, and collections.
  • Consistency
    The library offers a consistent API, which can make your code more readable and maintainable by providing a standard way to perform common programming tasks.
  • Lightweight
    Underscore.js is lightweight compared to full-featured libraries like Lodash, which can be a benefit if you're looking to minimize your application's footprint.
  • Browser Compatibility
    It supports a wide range of JavaScript environments, making it a good choice for projects that need to work across different browsers and Node.js.
  • Quick to Learn
    Easy to pick up for developers with even a basic understanding of JavaScript, due to its straightforward documentation and familiar function names.

Possible disadvantages

  • Performance
    Underscore.js may not offer the same level of performance optimizations as more modern utility libraries like Lodash, potentially leading to slower execution for some tasks.
  • Limited Functionality
    While it covers many basic utility functions, its feature set is not as extensive as Lodash or other similar libraries, which provide a broader range of capabilities.
  • Outdated
    With the advent of ECMAScript 5 and later versions, many of the functions provided by Underscore.js are now natively available in JavaScript, reducing its necessity.
  • No Modularization
    Underscore does not support modular builds in the same way Lodash does, meaning you might end up including the entire library even if you only need a few functions.
  • Community and Maintenance
    While still maintained, Underscore.js has seen less active development and contributions compared to newer libraries, which could impact its long-term viability and support.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

simplehttp
Underscore.js

Overall verdict

  • simplehttp (notably the bitly/simplehttp C library) is a solid, lightweight toolkit for building fast HTTP-based services, but it's a somewhat dated and niche project with limited ongoing maintenance, so it's better suited for specific performance-focused use cases than as a general-purpose modern web framework.

Why this product is good

  • Written in C and built on libevent, offering very high performance and low overhead for simple HTTP endpoints
  • Provides a collection of ready-made daemons (e.g., for queuing, counting, pubsub) that solve common infrastructure problems out of the box
  • Small, auditable codebase makes it easy to understand, modify, or embed into existing C/C++ projects
  • Proven in production at scale (originally developed and used by Bitly for high-throughput services)
  • Minimal dependencies compared to heavier frameworks, making deployment simpler in constrained environments

Recommended for

  • Developers needing lightweight, high-performance HTTP microservices in C
  • Teams building internal infrastructure tools like counters, queues, or simple pub/sub systems
  • Projects where minimal footprint and speed are prioritized over feature-rich frameworks
  • Engineers comfortable working with C and willing to maintain/extend an older, less actively developed codebase
  • Not ideal for teams wanting modern web framework features, active community support, or built-in security/auth layers

Overall verdict

  • Underscore.js is a reasonable choice if you need a lightweight library for concise, functional programming helpers. While newer libraries or vanilla JavaScript have made some of its functions less essential, Underscore.js remains useful for its simplicity and comprehensive utility set.

Why this product is good

  • Underscore.js is a popular JavaScript library that provides a comprehensive set of utility functions for common programming tasks. It is valued for its simplicity and ease of integration, especially in projects that require functional programming patterns but do not need the full capabilities of larger libraries like Lodash. Underscore.js is lightweight and can significantly enhance productivity by offering functions for tasks such as object manipulation, array operations, and function binding, making code more readable and maintainable.

Recommended for

    Developers working on smaller projects or legacy codebases that require a reliable utility library with functional programming techniques. It’s also suitable for those who prefer a minimalistic approach and don’t require the extensive features of heavier alternatives.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

simplehttp 0 videos + Add
Underscore.js 1 video + Add

No simplehttp videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Introduction to Underscore.JS

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
simplehttp
Underscore.js
3% 3%
Development Tools
97% 97%
3% 3%
Javascript UI Libraries
97% 97%
15% 15%
JavaScript Framework
85% 85%
0% 0%
Libraries And Widgets
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using simplehttp and Underscore.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

simplehttp 0 mentions
Underscore.js 24 mentions

Tracking simplehttp since Mar 2021.

  • JavaScript Awesome Package
    Underscore - JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • JavaScript evolution: From Lodash and Underscore to vanilla
    Underscore was created by Jeremy Ashkenas (the creator of Backbone.js) in 2009 to provide a set of utility functions that JavaScript lacked at the time. It was also created to work with Backbone.js, but it slowly became a favorite among... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • KlongPy: High-Performance Array Programming in Python
    There was a step-change improvement for me when I tried expressing some JS patterns via `underscore.js` instead of procedurally: eg: http://underscorejs.org/#each Thinking of something as `each | map | filter | sum` is waaay less buggy... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

View more

Alternatives to simplehttp and Underscore.js

When comparing simplehttp and Underscore.js, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...