Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

simplehttp VS Underscore.js

Compare simplehttp VS Underscore.js and see what are their differences

Modelence
Create production-ready applications with zero code sponsored
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

simplehttp logo simplehttp

A family of libraries and daemons for building scalable web infrastructure.

Underscore.js logo Underscore.js

Underscore is a utility-belt library for JavaScript that provides a lot of the functional...
  • simplehttp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-10
  • Underscore.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-12-17

simplehttp features and specs

  • Easy to Use
    Simplehttp is designed to be easy to use, with minimal setup and a straightforward API that makes it accessible for developers who need to quickly implement HTTP servers and clients.
  • Lightweight
    The library is lightweight, which means it has a small footprint and is suitable for applications where minimizing resource usage is important.
  • Fast Setup
    It allows for rapid deployment and configuration, enabling developers to get an HTTP server up and running quickly without dealing with complex configurations.

Possible disadvantages of simplehttp

  • Limited Functionality
    Being simple and lightweight, simplehttp may lack some advanced features and flexibility compared to more comprehensive HTTP libraries.
  • Community and Support
    As it is not one of the most popular HTTP libraries, it may have a smaller community, which can result in less community-driven support and fewer third-party resources.
  • Documentation
    The documentation, while sufficient for basic use, might not be as extensive or detailed as larger, more widely-used libraries, which could pose challenges for new users.

Underscore.js features and specs

  • Utility Functions
    Underscore.js provides a wealth of utility functions for common tasks such as map, reduce, filter, and more, making it easier to perform operations on arrays, objects, and collections.
  • Consistency
    The library offers a consistent API, which can make your code more readable and maintainable by providing a standard way to perform common programming tasks.
  • Lightweight
    Underscore.js is lightweight compared to full-featured libraries like Lodash, which can be a benefit if you're looking to minimize your application's footprint.
  • Browser Compatibility
    It supports a wide range of JavaScript environments, making it a good choice for projects that need to work across different browsers and Node.js.
  • Quick to Learn
    Easy to pick up for developers with even a basic understanding of JavaScript, due to its straightforward documentation and familiar function names.

Possible disadvantages of Underscore.js

  • Performance
    Underscore.js may not offer the same level of performance optimizations as more modern utility libraries like Lodash, potentially leading to slower execution for some tasks.
  • Limited Functionality
    While it covers many basic utility functions, its feature set is not as extensive as Lodash or other similar libraries, which provide a broader range of capabilities.
  • Outdated
    With the advent of ECMAScript 5 and later versions, many of the functions provided by Underscore.js are now natively available in JavaScript, reducing its necessity.
  • No Modularization
    Underscore does not support modular builds in the same way Lodash does, meaning you might end up including the entire library even if you only need a few functions.
  • Community and Maintenance
    While still maintained, Underscore.js has seen less active development and contributions compared to newer libraries, which could impact its long-term viability and support.

Analysis of simplehttp

Overall verdict

  • simplehttp (notably the bitly/simplehttp C library) is a solid, lightweight toolkit for building fast HTTP-based services, but it's a somewhat dated and niche project with limited ongoing maintenance, so it's better suited for specific performance-focused use cases than as a general-purpose modern web framework.

Why this product is good

  • Written in C and built on libevent, offering very high performance and low overhead for simple HTTP endpoints
  • Provides a collection of ready-made daemons (e.g., for queuing, counting, pubsub) that solve common infrastructure problems out of the box
  • Small, auditable codebase makes it easy to understand, modify, or embed into existing C/C++ projects
  • Proven in production at scale (originally developed and used by Bitly for high-throughput services)
  • Minimal dependencies compared to heavier frameworks, making deployment simpler in constrained environments

Recommended for

  • Developers needing lightweight, high-performance HTTP microservices in C
  • Teams building internal infrastructure tools like counters, queues, or simple pub/sub systems
  • Projects where minimal footprint and speed are prioritized over feature-rich frameworks
  • Engineers comfortable working with C and willing to maintain/extend an older, less actively developed codebase
  • Not ideal for teams wanting modern web framework features, active community support, or built-in security/auth layers

Analysis of Underscore.js

Overall verdict

  • Underscore.js is a reasonable choice if you need a lightweight library for concise, functional programming helpers. While newer libraries or vanilla JavaScript have made some of its functions less essential, Underscore.js remains useful for its simplicity and comprehensive utility set.

Why this product is good

  • Underscore.js is a popular JavaScript library that provides a comprehensive set of utility functions for common programming tasks. It is valued for its simplicity and ease of integration, especially in projects that require functional programming patterns but do not need the full capabilities of larger libraries like Lodash. Underscore.js is lightweight and can significantly enhance productivity by offering functions for tasks such as object manipulation, array operations, and function binding, making code more readable and maintainable.

Recommended for

    Developers working on smaller projects or legacy codebases that require a reliable utility library with functional programming techniques. Itโ€™s also suitable for those who prefer a minimalistic approach and donโ€™t require the extensive features of heavier alternatives.

simplehttp videos

No simplehttp videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Underscore.js videos

+ Add

Introduction to Underscore.JS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to simplehttp and Underscore.js)

simplehttp

Underscore.js

Development Tools
3 3%
Development Tools
97% 97
Javascript UI Libraries
3 3%
Javascript UI Libraries
97% 97
JavaScript Framework
15 15%
JavaScript Framework
85% 85
Libraries And Widgets
0 0%
Libraries And Widgets
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using simplehttp and Underscore.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Underscore.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 24 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

simplehttp mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of simplehttp yet. Tracking of simplehttp recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Underscore.js mentions (24)

  • JavaScript Awesome Package
    Underscore - JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • JavaScript evolution: From Lodash and Underscore to vanilla
    Underscore was created by Jeremy Ashkenas (the creator of Backbone.js) in 2009 to provide a set of utility functions that JavaScript lacked at the time. It was also created to work with Backbone.js, but it slowly became a favorite among developers who needed utility functions that they could just call and get stuff done with without having to worry about the inner implementations and browser compatibility. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • KlongPy: High-Performance Array Programming in Python
    There was a step-change improvement for me when I tried expressing some JS patterns via `underscore.js` instead of procedurally: eg: http://underscorejs.org/#each Thinking of something as `each | map | filter | sum` is waaay less buggy than writing bespoke procedural code to do the same thing. No doubt there is a "cost" to it as well, but the _abstraction_ is valuable. Now, if there were a "compiler" which could... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • 100+ Must-Have Web Development Resources
    Underscore.js: A utility library that offers a full set of functional programming helpers without extending any built-in JavaScript objects. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Mastering Node.js
    Underscore contains just about every core utility method you want. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing simplehttp and Underscore.js, you can also consider the following products

jQuery - The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

React Native - A framework for building native apps with React

Babel - Babel is a compiler for writing next generation JavaScript.

Composer - Composer is a tool for dependency management in PHP.

OpenSSL - OpenSSL is a free and open source software cryptography library that implements both the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, which are primarily used to provide secure communications between web browsers and โ€ฆ

Raven.js - Raven.js is a standalone JavaScript client for Sentry.

Loading...