Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Simple Share Buttons VS Ember-cli

Compare Simple Share Buttons VS Ember-cli and see what are their differences

Simple Share Buttons

SimpleShareButtons is a plug-in for WordPress that comes with eleven different social sharing button sets.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
E
Ember-cli

Application and Data, Libraries, and JavaScript Framework Components

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Measure.sh
Measure helps mobile teams monitor and fix crashes, ANRs, bugs, and performance issues. The open source alternative to Firebase Crashlytics. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Ember-cli seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 1
Social Media Tools popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Simple Share Buttons
E
Ember-cli
Website sharethis.com cli.emberjs.com
Listed in
Social Media Tools Social Media Marketing Twitter Tools Digital Publishing +1
Developer Tools Design Tools Productivity

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Simple Share Buttons 4 features
E
Ember-cli 5 features
  • Ease of Integration
    Simple Share Buttons are easy to integrate into WordPress sites with just a few clicks, requiring no advanced technical skills.
  • Customizability
    The plugin offers several customization options for the appearance of the share buttons, allowing them to align with your site's design.
  • Social Media Reach
    By adding share buttons, users can easily share content across multiple social media platforms, increasing visibility and engagement.
  • Responsive Design
    The share buttons are responsive, ensuring a seamless user experience across different devices and screen sizes.

Possible disadvantages

  • Performance Impact
    Adding external scripts such as social media buttons can potentially slow down website loading times.
  • Limited Features in Free Version
    Some advanced features may only be available in the paid version, limiting functionality for free users.
  • Privacy Concerns
    Integrating with social media platforms may raise privacy concerns among users who prefer not to be tracked.
  • Potential for Style Clashes
    Without proper customization, the default button styles may not match the site's existing design, causing inconsistencies.
  • Convention over Configuration
    Ember-cli enforces strong conventions for file structure, naming, and project organization, which reduces decision fatigue and makes it easier for developers to jump between different Ember projects with minimal onboarding time.
  • Built-in Tooling
    Comes with a robust set of built-in tools including a development server, testing framework integration (QUnit), asset compilation, and live reload, reducing the need to manually configure and integrate third-party build tools.
  • Addon Ecosystem
    Ember-cli supports a rich ecosystem of addons that can be easily installed and integrated into projects, allowing developers to extend functionality without reinventing the wheel for common features.
  • Blueprints and Generators
    Provides powerful generator commands (blueprints) that scaffold components, routes, models, and other application pieces quickly, speeding up development and ensuring consistency across the codebase.
  • Stable Long-term Support
    Ember-cli follows Ember's release cycle with clear LTS (Long Term Support) versions, providing stability and predictability for teams maintaining large applications over time.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steep Learning Curve
    The strict conventions and unique architecture of Ember-cli can be difficult for newcomers to learn, especially those coming from more flexible frameworks or with no prior Ember experience.
  • Smaller Community Compared to Alternatives
    Compared to tools like Vite, Webpack, or CRA used with React/Vue, Ember-cli has a smaller community and ecosystem, which can mean fewer third-party resources, tutorials, and community-driven troubleshooting.
  • Build Performance
    For large applications, Ember-cli's build process can become slow, and while improvements have been made with embroider, some developers still report slower build times compared to more modern bundlers.
  • Rigid Structure
    The opinionated nature of Ember-cli, while helpful for consistency, can feel restrictive for developers who prefer more flexibility in structuring their applications or adopting non-standard patterns.
  • Migration Complexity
    Upgrading between major Ember-cli versions or migrating to newer build systems like Embroider can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for older or heavily customized applications.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Simple Share Buttons
E
Ember-cli

No analysis of Simple Share Buttons yet.

Overall verdict

  • Ember CLI is a solid, mature command-line tool for building Ember.js applications, offering strong conventions, built-in tooling, and a stable development workflow that has been refined over many years.

Why this product is good

  • Provides a standardized project structure and conventions, reducing setup decisions and configuration overhead
  • Includes built-in support for ES modules, testing, and asset compilation out of the box
  • Strong addon ecosystem allows easy integration of third-party functionality
  • Backed by the official Ember.js team, ensuring long-term support and consistent updates
  • Automatic reloading and rebuilding during development speeds up the workflow
  • Encourages best practices like testing and modular code organization

Recommended for

  • Teams building large-scale, maintainable web applications with Ember.js
  • Developers who prefer convention-over-configuration frameworks
  • Projects that require long-term stability and structured upgrade paths
  • Organizations already invested in the Ember.js ecosystem
  • Developers who value built-in testing and tooling integration without extra setup

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Simple Share Buttons 1 video + Add
E
Ember-cli 0 videos + Add

Simple Share Buttons Plus

No Ember-cli videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Simple Share Buttons
E
Ember-cli
100% 100%
Social Media Tools
0% 0%
0% 0%
Productivity
100% 100%
100% 100%
Social Media Marketing
0% 0%
0% 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Simple Share Buttons and Ember-cli. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Simple Share Buttons 0 mentions
E
Ember-cli 1 mention

Tracking Simple Share Buttons since Mar 2021.

  • Help! Why does chrome console inner text and my program inner text not return the same values? (spent nearly the whole day trying to extract an element). Turned to reddit as its always had the best community. Any help is MASSIVELY appreciated. Puppeteer!!
    The webpage is LinkedIn.com. While this isn’t a framework, I know that are using https://cli.emberjs.com/release/. Source: about 5 years ago

Alternatives to Simple Share Buttons and Ember-cli

When comparing Simple Share Buttons and Ember-cli, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...