Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Sideband VS ShellNewHandler

Compare Sideband VS ShellNewHandler and see what are their differences

S
Sideband

Sideband page at unsigned.io

Rating
0 reviews
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
ShellNewHandler

SourceForge.net: ShellNewHandler details page

Rating
0 reviews
Promote on VibeVoted
Alternatives Is it good?
Netumo
Ensure healthy website performance, uptime, and free from vulnerabilities. Automatic checks for SSL Certificates, domains and monitor issues with your websites all from one console and get instant notifications on any issues. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, ShellNewHandler seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 2
Group Chat & Notifications popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

S
Sideband
ShellNewHandler
Website unsigned.io sourceforge.net
Listed in
Communication Group Chat & Notifications Instant Messaging Chat +1
Cloud Storage Monitoring Tools File Sharing Website Monitoring +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

S
Sideband 5 features
ShellNewHandler 0 features
  • Fully decentralized
    Sideband operates over the Reticulum Network Stack, requiring no centralized servers, phone numbers, or accounts. This makes it resilient and independent of traditional internet infrastructure.
  • Works over diverse mediums
    It can communicate over many transport types including LoRa radios, packet radio, WiFi, Ethernet, I2P, and even serial links, giving it flexibility in off-grid and low-infrastructure environments.
  • Strong encryption and privacy
    All communications are end-to-end encrypted by default using Reticulum's cryptographic primitives, and there is no requirement to provide personal identifying information.
  • Off-grid and resilient communication
    Designed to function without conventional internet, it enables messaging in remote areas, during outages, or in emergency scenarios using low-bandwidth radio links.
  • Free and open source
    Sideband is released as free and open source software, allowing anyone to inspect, modify, audit, and use it without licensing costs.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steep learning curve
    Understanding Reticulum concepts, addressing, interfaces, and transport configuration can be challenging for users unfamiliar with networking or radio communications.
  • Requires compatible infrastructure
    To take full advantage of off-grid features, users often need additional hardware like LoRa devices or nodes, which adds cost and setup complexity.
  • Small user base
    As a niche application, it has a limited community and fewer contacts to communicate with compared to mainstream messaging apps, reducing its everyday utility.
  • Low bandwidth limitations
    When operating over radio links like LoRa, throughput is very limited, making it unsuitable for large media transfers or high-volume messaging.
  • Limited polish and support
    Being a community-driven open source project, it may lack the refined user experience, extensive documentation, and dedicated support found in commercial messaging platforms.

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

S
Sideband
ShellNewHandler

Overall verdict

  • Sideband is a solid, privacy-focused messaging application built on the Reticulum Network Stack, offering resilient, encrypted communication that works even without traditional internet infrastructure.

Why this product is good

  • Built on Reticulum, enabling communication over diverse mediums like LoRa radio, packet radio, WiFi, and the internet
  • Strong end-to-end encryption and no reliance on centralized servers or accounts
  • Works completely off-grid and in infrastructure-less environments, making it resilient for emergencies
  • Open source and free, aligning with the ethos of digital sovereignty and self-hosting
  • Cross-platform availability including Android, Linux, and other desktop environments
  • Low-bandwidth efficiency allows it to function on slow or intermittent links

Recommended for

  • Privacy-conscious users who want decentralized, serverless messaging
  • Amateur radio and LoRa enthusiasts building mesh or long-range networks
  • Preppers and emergency communication planners needing off-grid resilience
  • Activists, journalists, and others in areas with censored or unreliable internet
  • Tinkerers and developers interested in experimental decentralized networking

Overall verdict

  • ShellNewHandler is a niche, lightweight utility hosted on SourceForge designed to give users more control over the Windows 'New' context menu (the ShellNew menu). It can be considered good for its specific narrow use case, but it is an older, minimally maintained tool that may not suit all users, especially those on modern Windows versions.

Why this product is good

  • Provides direct control over customizing the Windows right-click 'New' menu, allowing users to add or remove file type entries
  • Lightweight and free, without bundled bloatware typical of some other free utilities
  • Simple and focused in scope, making it easy to understand for its specific purpose
  • Open distribution via SourceForge allows transparency and no-cost access

Recommended for

  • Power users who want to declutter or customize the Windows New context menu
  • IT administrators managing standardized desktop environments across multiple machines
  • Users comfortable with older utility-style tools and Windows registry-related tweaks
  • Not recommended for casual users seeking modern, actively supported software with regular updates

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
S
Sideband
ShellNewHandler
100% 100%
Group Chat & Notifications
0% 0%
0% 0%
Website Monitoring
100% 100%
100% 100%
Instant Messaging
0% 0%
0% 0%
File Sharing
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Sideband and ShellNewHandler. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

S
Sideband 0 mentions
ShellNewHandler 2 mentions

Tracking Sideband since Jul 2026.

  • I recently got libreoffice, but now the new option in right click looks like a mess. Can someone help me get rid of them please?
    Use Shell New Handler. Run the portable app and simply untick the items you don't want to appear in your new context menu. Source: about 4 years ago
  • This menu should be easy to add/remove programs to... Who is really creating Access Databases from this menu often enough to keep it here? (Not me!) Is there an easy way to edit this?
    I've always used ShellNewHandler for this. It's a really simple portable utility that allows you to remove most of the items from that menu. Tested it out on Windows 11 and it's still compatible. Source: over 5 years ago

Alternatives to Sideband and ShellNewHandler

When comparing Sideband and ShellNewHandler, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...