
Shipfony
Larafast
Laravel Spark
SaaS Pegasus
SaaSBlueprint.app
SaaS Starter Kit
SaaSykit
Production-grade Symfony 7.4 LTS boilerplate for SaaS: 2FA and magic-link sign-in, Stripe and Lemon Squeezy billing with signed webhooks, teams and roles, admin metrics, EU e-invoicing, Docker and VPS deploy. One-time payment, no Node.js.

Shipfony
Larafast
Laravel Spark
ShipFast.AI
BoilerCode
SaaSykit
Ship It Kit by Goosekit
The Angular boilerplate you need to launch your next SaaS startup. From idea to production 10x faster.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, ShipAnvil seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | shipanvil.com | shipangular.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | Startup from France · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 | Startup from Canada · 1 - 9 employees · 2024 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


ShipAnvil is a Symfony boilerplate for SaaS products: the plumbing you would otherwise write in your first two months, already written, tested and documented, so you start on the part that is actually your product. What is in it: sign-in with TOTP two-factor and backup codes, magic links,...
Supercharge your next Saas startup instantly, launch faster, and make money. Spend your time building your startup, not integrating APIs. ShipAngular provides you with the boilerplate code you need to launch in days not months! Emails • Send transactional emails • DNS setup to avoid spam folder...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of ShipAnvil yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing ShipAnvil and ShipAngular.
ShipAngular's answer:
ShipAnvil's answer
Almost every SaaS starter kit is JavaScript: Next.js, Remix, SvelteKit. ShipAnvil is Symfony, and it is built the way a Symfony team would actually build: Doctrine entities, the security component, Messenger, Twig, and no Node.js anywhere in the build (Tailwind runs standalone, assets go through AssetMapper). Two payment providers, Stripe and Lemon Squeezy, sit behind one interface, so switching is a config change rather than a rewrite. And it ships with EU e-invoicing (Factur-X / EN 16931) already wired, which is a European problem that American kits do not solve.
ShipAnvil's answer
If you write PHP, the honest answer is stack: a JavaScript kit means learning someone else's ecosystem before you write a line of your own product. Beyond that, three things. It targets Symfony 7.4 LTS, supported until 2029, so a kit bought once does not force a major upgrade six months later. Both payment providers are implemented, not just documented. And the parts people usually postpone are already there and tested: two-factor, webhook replay protection, team roles, an admin with MRR and churn, EU e-invoicing.
ShipAnvil's answer
Developers who already write PHP and Symfony and are starting a product of their own: solo founders, freelancers building a SaaS on the side, and small agencies who ship client products on Symfony and want a base they can reuse. It assumes you are comfortable with Doctrine, Twig and a terminal. It is not a no-code builder, and it is not for people looking for a hosted platform.
ShipAnvil's answer
It came out of starting the same project too many times. Every new Symfony product began with the same six weeks before anything specific got written: sign-in and two-factor, billing and the webhook edge cases, teams and roles, an admin with the numbers you actually watch, transactional email, deployment. None of it is the product, all of it has to be right, and getting webhook replay protection or tenant isolation wrong is the kind of mistake you find out about late. So that groundwork was extracted, hardened, tested and documented, and it is now sold as a kit rather than rebuilt each time.
ShipAnvil's answer
Symfony 7.4 LTS on PHP 8.4 or 8.5, with Doctrine ORM and PostgreSQL 16+. The front end is Twig with Turbo and Stimulus, assets through AssetMapper, and Tailwind v4 in its standalone binary, so there is no Node.js and no bundler in the build. Payments go to Stripe and Lemon Squeezy, e-invoicing follows Factur-X and EN 16931, and the optional AI module talks to the Claude API with streaming and tool use. It ships as a multi-stage Docker image, with a recipe for a plain VPS.
Share your experience with using ShipAnvil and ShipAngular. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Two bash scripts and two PHP files: they create a throwaway database and two roles, build the table in each of the five configurations, run the assertions under both connections, and drop everything on the way out. PostgreSQL 18.3, PHP... - Source: dev.to / 25 days ago
Tracking ShipAngular since Oct 2024.
When comparing ShipAnvil and ShipAngular, you can also consider the following products.

Symfony PHP SaaS Boilerplate Authentication Stripe Billing Admin Dashboard REST API Doctrine ORM Tailwind CSS Twig Stimulus Multi-tenant AI Workflows Workflow Automation CLI Tools
Compare Shipfony to ShipAnvil or ShipAngular:

The Laravel SaaS Boilerplate powered with ready-to-go components for Payments, Admin, Blog, SEO and more...
Compare Larafast to ShipAnvil or ShipAngular:

Spark provides the perfect starting point for your next big idea.
Compare Laravel Spark to ShipAnvil or ShipAngular:

The Pegasus SaaS boilerplate provides core features like user management, teams, subscription billing, APIs and more in a codebase that developers love.
Compare SaaS Pegasus to ShipAnvil or ShipAngular:


Build the SaaS you’re using right now.
Compare SaaSBlueprint.app to ShipAnvil or ShipAngular: