
SourceForge.net: ShellNewHandler details page

Nylas Mail
Evolution
Mailbird
Mailpile
Polymail
Robotomail
Email infrastructure for AI agents. Inbound is parsed, classified, extracted to your schema — and screened for prompt injection — before your agent reads a word.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, ShellNewHandler seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | sourceforge.net | postfleet.ai |
| Pricing | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from the United States · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of ShellNewHandler yet.
Postfleet is inbound email infrastructure for AI agents, built on the assumption that any message can be an attack. Every message runs the same pipeline before your agent sees it: SPF/DKIM/DMARC checks, HTML-to-text cleaning, removal of hidden elements, HTML comments and zero-width characters,...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


No features have been listed yet.
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of Postfleet yet.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing ShellNewHandler and Postfleet.
Postfleet's answer:
It treats an agent's inbox as a trust boundary, not a pipe. Every inbound email is screened for prompt injection, stripped of hidden text, and turned into structured JSON before the agent ever reads it. The unusual part: I red-team the filter with rival models and publish the whole scoreboard, catches and misses both. Screened, never immune.
Postfleet's answer:
Most email APIs for agents hand you the raw body and leave defense to your app layer. Postfleet screens first and fails closed, so flagged mail reaches the agent as inert data instead of trusted content. It's backed by an injection guarantee and a public red-team scoreboard, so the security claim comes with receipts rather than a marketing number.
Postfleet's answer:
Developers building AI agents that receive email: indie hackers, agent-framework builders, and small platform teams wiring an agent to an inbox. People who've read at least one prompt-injection horror story and would rather see published results than take a claim on faith.
Postfleet's answer:
I've spent 18 years building software, the last 6 as an architect drawing trust boundaries between systems that shouldn't blindly trust each other. When I watched people give AI agents email inboxes, I saw the boundary everyone skipped: anyone who can email an agent can drop instructions into its context. Postfleet is that missing boundary.
Postfleet's answer:
Next.js, TypeScript, and Supabase (Postgres), deployed on Vercel. An MCP server so an agent can sign itself up. Anthropic models run the injection scan and schema extraction, Resend/SES handles inbound mail, and ClamAV scans attachments.
Share your experience with using ShellNewHandler and Postfleet. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Use Shell New Handler. Run the portable app and simply untick the items you don't want to appear in your new context menu. Source: about 4 years ago
I've always used ShellNewHandler for this. It's a really simple portable utility that allows you to remove most of the items from that menu. Tested it out on Windows 11 and it's still compatible. Source: over 5 years ago
Tracking Postfleet since Aug 2026.