ShellNewHandler VS Owlity.ai

Owlity.ai's answer:

Owlity's uniqueness comes from combining two things that are usually sold separately: a no-code recorder and real QA expertise, in one platform. Most tools force a choice — either a DIY automation tool that leaves teams to figure out coverage on their own, or a fully managed service priced and scaled for enterprises. Owlity closes that gap. Teams record tests themselves in minutes with Owlity Eye, then let Owlity's experts expand that coverage further, up to 95%, without needing to hire or manage a QA team. It's also built by the founders of DeviQA, a QA services company with 16 years of hands-on testing experience — so the expert layer isn't an afterthought, it's the core of how the platform was designed.

Owlity.ai's answer:

Owlity's primary audience is scaling startup CTOs and engineering leads — typically Series A–B B2B SaaS companies with 10–50 engineers, shipping weekly without a dedicated QA hire. They're the ones feeling the pressure of releasing fast while worrying a bug will reach a customer before the team catches it. Beyond that core group, Owlity also serves two adjacent audiences: digital agencies handling testing across multiple client projects, and individual QA engineers who want to expand their coverage without the backing of a full QA team.

Owlity.ai's answer:

Owlity was born out of a problem its founders, Oleg Sadikov and Dmitry Reznik, kept seeing play out for 16 years. They also run DeviQA, a QA services company that's worked with product teams since 2010 — so they'd watched startups and scaling companies hit the same wall again and again: everyone knew solid test coverage mattered, but nobody could quite get there. Manual testing couldn't keep up with fast shipping. DIY automation tools took months to set up properly. And hiring an in-house QA team was a cost most companies couldn't justify. Owlity is their answer to that gap. It pairs a no-code recorder — simple enough for anyone on the team to use — with real QA expertise behind the scenes, so companies can get to 95% test coverage without the time sink of building automation themselves or the expense of hiring a QA department.

Owlity.ai's answer:

Owlity sits in a gap most competitors don't cover. No-code recorders like Mabl or Testim are easy to start with, but teams are left on their own to expand and maintain coverage as the product grows. Fully managed services like QA Wolf solve that, but come with enterprise pricing and long contracts that don't make sense for a smaller team. Owlity gives teams both sides: a no-code recorder simple enough to start using in minutes, plus real QA expertise to expand that coverage to 95% — without the enterprise price tag or the commitment of a large managed contract. Pricing is credit-based and scales with actual usage, and teams can move between self-serve and managed support as their needs change, rather than being locked into one model.