Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

ShellHub VS Burrow.io

Compare ShellHub VS Burrow.io and see what are their differences

ShellHub logo ShellHub

ShellHub enables teams to easily access any Linux device behind firewall and NAT

Burrow.io logo Burrow.io

Expose localhost to the internet.
  • ShellHub Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-02
  • Burrow.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-22

ShellHub features and specs

  • Centralized Management
    ShellHub offers centralized management for all your SSH devices, making it easier to manage multiple devices from a single interface.
  • Access Control
    With ShellHub, administrators can set up role-based access control, allowing for granular permissions and improved security over who can access which devices.
  • Web-based Terminal
    ShellHub provides a web-based terminal that allows users to access SSH devices through a browser, eliminating the need for a local SSH client.
  • Cloud and On-premises Deployment
    Users have the flexibility to deploy ShellHub in the cloud or on-premises, which can be tailored to their specific infrastructure needs and compliance requirements.
  • Audit Logging
    ShellHub includes audit logging features that help in tracking and monitoring user activity for better compliance and auditing purposes.

Possible disadvantages of ShellHub

  • Complexity for Small Networks
    For smaller networks or fewer devices, ShellHub might be overkill and introduce unnecessary complexity compared to simpler SSH management solutions.
  • Resource Intensive
    Deploying and running ShellHub can be resource-intensive, requiring sufficient hardware and potentially leading to higher operational costs.
  • Learning Curve
    Users may encounter a learning curve when initially setting up and configuring ShellHub, especially if they are new to centralized device management systems.
  • Dependency on Web Interface
    Relying on the web-based interface may be a disadvantage in environments where network reliability is an issue or where minimalist solutions are preferred.
  • Potential Security Risks
    As with any centralized management system, there is a potential risk that a compromised ShellHub deployment could lead to broader access issues across managed devices.

Burrow.io features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Burrow.io offers a simple and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to get started with the platform.
  • Effective Kafka Monitoring
    It provides effective monitoring tools for Apache Kafka, which allows users to track the performance and health of Kafka clusters efficiently.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source tool, Burrow.io allows users to customize and adapt the tool according to their specific needs.
  • Integration Capabilities
    It has strong integration capabilities, which make it easy to incorporate into existing workflows and systems.

Possible disadvantages of Burrow.io

  • Limited Support
    As an open-source tool, it may have limited official support, which can be a barrier for users who require assistance or encounter issues.
  • Complex Setup
    Some users might find the initial setup and configuration of Burrow.io to be complex, especially if they are not experienced with Kafka or monitoring tools.
  • Performance Overheads
    Monitoring tools like Burrow.io can add performance overhead, which might affect the monitored systems if not configured correctly.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might face a learning curve as they need to understand both Burrow.io's functionalities and its application in a Kafka environment.

ShellHub videos

No ShellHub videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Burrow.io videos

Best Alternative Of Burrow.io / Static Port For Lifetime ๐Ÿ˜ฑ

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ShellHub and Burrow.io)
Testing
38 38%
62% 62
Localhost Tools
37 37%
63% 63
Webhooks
44 44%
56% 56
Tunnel
29 29%
71% 71

User comments

Share your experience with using ShellHub and Burrow.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare ShellHub and Burrow.io

ShellHub Reviews

We have no reviews of ShellHub yet.
Be the first one to post

Burrow.io Reviews

Tunnelling services for exposing localhost to the web
There are also a number of paid options, like pagekite, Forward and Burrow.io. I did not try them out, because for me, the free options more than cover my needs. But Iโ€™m putting them up here anyway just in case they cover some of your use cases.
Source: chenhuijing.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ShellHub seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ShellHub mentions (1)

  • Tutorial: How to access Raspberry Pi remotely from anywhere
    And we finished. Now You can access your RPI in an easy, fast, and safe way. If you have any doubts, feel free to check our documentation or contact us at contact@shellhub.io. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago

Burrow.io mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Burrow.io yet. Tracking of Burrow.io recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ShellHub and Burrow.io, you can also consider the following products

ngrok - ngrok enables secure introspectable tunnels to localhost webhook development tool and debugging tool.

LocalXpose - Your network without the IT work. Radically simple, always-on tunneling service for mission-critical applications.

Pagekite - Bring your localhost servers on-line.

Staqlab Tunnel - Expose server running on your localhost to internet and get a public domain which would work everywhere

sish - An open source serveo/ngrok alternative. HTTP(S)/WS(S)/TCP Tunnels to localhost using only SSH.

Packetriot - Serve Apps, Connect Software, Access Devices.