SerpApi VS StackSwap

SerpApi's answer

We provide more search engines under one subscription.

StackSwap's answer:

Two reasons:

1. Speed. SaaS Management Platforms take 2-6 weeks to onboard and another 30-60 days to surface useful insights. StackSwap takes 60 seconds. Different product class.

2. Cost. SMP contracts start around $20k/yr. The free Stackscan covers most of what a founder or RevOps lead needs to start the consolidation conversation.

Honest take: if you're already running an SMP and getting value, keep it. StackSwap is the faster diagnostic, not the replacement. If you're shopping the SMP category, run StackSwap first to see what you actually need before sitting through five demos.

SerpApi's answer

Developers/Companies who need data from search engines.

StackSwap's answer:

B2B SaaS founders, RevOps leads, and Heads of Sales / Marketing / Revenue at companies in the 10-200 employee range — typically post-seed, pre-Series-B — where the GTM stack has grown organically and nobody owns the audit. Common trigger: a board meeting where someone asks "are we paying for tools we don't use?"

Also: buyers evaluating the SaaS spend management category who want a directional read before sitting through enterprise sales cycles.

SerpApi's answer

Ruby on Rails and MongoDB

StackSwap's answer:

Next.js 14 (App Router) on Vercel, TypeScript, Supabase (Postgres + Auth + Storage), Stripe for billing, Anthropic's Claude API for LLM-assisted analysis, Sentry for observability.

Built deliberately on a thin stack — the irony of running a tool-overlap audit on 30 SaaS subscriptions wasn't lost on me.

SerpApi's answer

We're the first web scraping company that focus on scraping search engines.

StackSwap's answer:

Most SaaS spend tools — Vendr, Zylo, Productiv, BetterCloud — require integrations with billing, SSO, or HRIS before they tell you anything. They're heavyweight onboarded platforms. StackSwap is the opposite: drop in your tool list, get a structured audit in ~60 seconds, no integration. Overlap surfaced by category, with keep / replace / remove calls. It's the diagnostic step before the platform commitment, not a replacement for it.

SerpApi's answer

Back in 2017, Julien Khaleghy, the founder of SerpApi, built an iOS app that can analyze data from a picture. iOS didn't have a proper machine learning framework back then. It was challenging: iPhones' RAM were limited, no GPU or no dedicated chip acceleration were available, using only CPU was painfully slow, and compiling/porting C code from machine learning framework like Tensorflow or Caffe to iOS wasn't straightforward. Oddly, all of this wasn't the most difficult part of this project. Collecting images from Google Images was.

In these projects, 80% of his time ended up being spent on scraping and parsing Google Images. And maybe only 20% on actual machine learning model training, UI design of the actual apps, and iOS programming. This is how SerpApi was born.

StackSwap's answer:

I spent 10 years in B2B SaaS sales — BDR through Head of Revenue — selling into hundreds of mid-market and enterprise teams. I watched companies pay six figures a year for two competing data enrichment tools because nobody owned the audit and nobody wanted to fight the renewal motion.

StackSwap is the tool I would've hated to face as a vendor on the renewal call: free, fast, takes the buyer's side, names overlap by name. The category I sold in for a decade gets auditable.

SerpApi's answer

• Airbnb
• Nvidia
• Meta
• Shopify
• Grubhub
• and more!