
Thycotic
Deception Services
OneNeck IT Solutions
Centrify Endpoint Services
NowSecure
CounterTack
NCC Group
Seqrite enterprise security solutions help to detect, protect, respond to cyber attacks with integrated approach of enterprise network security.

Conduktor
UI for Apache Kafka
Kpow by Factor House
KafkaHQ
Lenses.io
Redis Commander
Another Redis DeskTop Manager
Self-hosted console for Kafka, Redis, RabbitMQ and Apache Artemis: one permission model, production guardrails and a tamper-evident audit trail.

Which is more popular?
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | seqrite.com | broka.dev |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from Turkey · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Seqrite yet.
BROKA is a self-hosted operations console for Kafka, Redis, RabbitMQ and Apache Artemis, with Memcached operated as a cache. It runs on your own infrastructure with Docker Compose; there is no hosted version. – One permission model: users, teams and scoped roles across every broker you connect. –...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
seqrite endpoint security 7.4 dasboard review
More videos
BROKA — One platform for your messaging infrastructure
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Seqrite and BROKA.
BROKA's answer:
BROKA operates Kafka, Redis, RabbitMQ and Apache Artemis, with Memcached as a cache, from one self-hosted console. They share one permission model, one set of environments and one tamper-evident audit trail.
Most tools cover a single broker, so a team that runs several ends up with a separate UI, login and permission set for each.
BROKA's answer:
BROKA's answer:
Platform, SRE and backend teams who operate message brokers and caches in production, and the team leads who need to know who can change what, and who did.
BROKA's answer:
Inside one company, different teams often run different brokers with different tools: one team on Kafka with its own UI, another on the RabbitMQ management UI, a third on the Redis CLI. Each has its own logins and permissions, and nobody has one picture of which service uses which topic or queue, who owns it, or who changed what.
The changes that hurt are usually the routine ones, like an offset reset on the wrong consumer group or a purge on the wrong queue. BROKA puts those brokers under the same roles, guardrails and audit trail.
BROKA's answer:
Share your experience with using Seqrite and BROKA. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
When comparing Seqrite and BROKA, you can also consider the following products.

The most full-featured privileged access management (PAM) solution available is easy to use, well adopted and affordable. Start your free 30-day trial here.
Compare Thycotic to Seqrite or BROKA:


Paladin Deception Services is here to assist you in obtaining the fictitious reference, the little white lie, or the alibi that you need.
Compare Deception Services to Seqrite or BROKA:

Open-Source Web GUI for Apache Kafka Management
Compare UI for Apache Kafka to Seqrite or BROKA:

OneNeck provides a comprehensive suite of enterprise-class IT solutions that are customized to fit your specific needs.
Compare OneNeck IT Solutions to Seqrite or BROKA:

Advanced Apache Kafka UI for monitoring and analytics
Compare Kpow by Factor House to Seqrite or BROKA: