Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

SendAllFiles VS SOAPEngine

Compare SendAllFiles VS SOAPEngine and see what are their differences

SendAllFiles

SendAllFiles is a zero-knowledge, end-to-end encrypted file sharing service. Share large files securely with client-side encryption, password-protected links, and strict download limits.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium $24 / Annually (Pro per user, billed yearly)
Alternatives Is it good?
SOAPEngine

This generic SOAP client allows you to access web services using a your iOS app, Mac OS X app and AppleTV app. - priore/SOAPEngine

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
PlexTrac
PlexTrac is the #1 AI-powered platform for pentest reporting and threat exposure management, helping cybersecurity teams efficiently address the most critical threats and vulnerabilities. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

SendAllFiles
SOAPEngine
Website sendallfiles.com github.com
Pricing
Freemium $24 / Annually (Pro per user, billed yearly) Official pricing
—
Platforms
Browser
—
Company 1 - 9 employees · 2025 —
Listed in
File Sharing, Security & Privacy Secure File Sharing File Sharing Security & Privacy Digital Courier File Protection File Uploads File Transfer +5
Mobile Development

About SendAllFiles and SOAPEngine

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

SendAllFiles
SOAPEngine

SendAllFiles is a Swiss-built secure file transfer service for individuals and teams sending large files while keeping control of access and decryption. Files and metadata are encrypted in the browser before upload with XChaCha20-Poly1305. Decryption keys remain client-side and never reach...

Read more about SendAllFiles

No description of SOAPEngine yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

SendAllFiles 3 features
SOAPEngine 4 features
  • Browser-side encryption
    Files and metadata are encrypted before upload; decryption keys stay client-side.
  • Private recipient links
    Recipients can download through a private link without creating an account.
  • Transfer controls
    Optional passwords, expiration, retention, download limits, and notifications.
  • Comprehensive SOAP Support
    SOAPEngine provides robust and thorough support for SOAP-based web services, making it easier for developers to integrate complex SOAP operations in their applications.
  • iOS and macOS Compatibility
    It is designed to work seamlessly with iOS and macOS platforms, ensuring that developers can build applications across Apple’s ecosystem using SOAP services.
  • Easy Integration
    SOAPEngine is relatively straightforward to integrate into existing projects, providing a variety of functionalities needed to quickly start consuming SOAP web services.
  • Automatic XML Parsing
    The library handles the parsing of XML responses automatically, which simplifies the developer's job by abstracting away the complexity of handling XML data.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited to Apple Platforms
    SOAPEngine is specifically designed for iOS and macOS, making it unsuitable for developers targeting cross-platform solutions that include Android or other systems.
  • Outdated Documentation
    Some users might find the documentation for SOAPEngine outdated or lacking clarity, potentially complicating the learning curve for new users.
  • Dependency on SOAP Protocol
    As SOAP is an older protocol compared to REST, developers using SOAPEngine are tied to using SOAP services, which might not be the best fit for newer web service designs.
  • Performance Overheads
    SOAP can introduce performance overheads due to its verbose nature and the XML format, potentially affecting the performance of applications using SOAPEngine.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

SendAllFiles
SOAPEngine

Overall verdict

  • I don't have verified information about SendAllFiles (sendallfiles.com) as it's not a widely documented or well-known file-sharing service that I can confidently assess. Before using it, I'd recommend researching its reputation, security practices, and user reviews independently.

Why this product is good

  • I lack reliable data on this specific service's features, security measures, or track record
  • The website does not appear in major review platforms or trusted tech resources I'm aware of
  • There are many established alternatives (WeTransfer, Google Drive, Dropbox, SendAnywhere) with proven reliability and transparent security practices

Recommended for

  • Users should exercise caution and verify SendAllFiles through independent research, security scans, and reviews before uploading sensitive files
  • Check for HTTPS encryption, clear privacy policy, company transparency, and recent user feedback
  • Consider established alternatives if data security and long-term reliability are priorities

Overall verdict

  • SOAPEngine is a solid choice for developers needing SOAP/XML web service integration in Apple ecosystem apps (iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS), offering a mature, well-documented library that simplifies working with legacy SOAP-based backends without requiring extensive boilerplate code.

Why this product is good

  • Provides a straightforward Objective-C/Swift API for consuming SOAP web services, abstracting away much of the complexity of manual XML parsing and request construction
  • Supports multiple Apple platforms (iOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS) making it versatile for cross-platform Apple development
  • Actively maintained with a track record on GitHub, giving developers confidence in its reliability
  • Handles common SOAP complexities like WSDL parsing, authentication, and complex data types
  • Good documentation and examples make it accessible for developers unfamiliar with SOAP intricacies
  • Reduces development time when integrating with older enterprise systems that still rely on SOAP APIs

Recommended for

  • iOS/macOS developers who need to integrate with legacy enterprise SOAP web services
  • Teams maintaining apps that connect to backend systems using WSDL-based services
  • Developers who want to avoid writing manual XML parsing and SOAP envelope construction from scratch
  • Projects requiring cross-platform support across multiple Apple devices with SOAP backend communication
  • Enterprise app developers working in industries (banking, healthcare, government) where SOAP remains a common integration standard

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
SendAllFiles
SOAPEngine
100% 100%
File Sharing
0% 0%
0% 0%
Mobile Development
100% 100%
100% 100%
Secure File Sharing
0% 0%
100% 100%
File Sharing, Security & Privacy
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using SendAllFiles and SOAPEngine. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Alternatives to SendAllFiles and SOAPEngine

When comparing SendAllFiles and SOAPEngine, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...