Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

ScreenSquid VS WebGazer.js

Compare ScreenSquid VS WebGazer.js and see what are their differences

ScreenSquid logo ScreenSquid

Discover how people really use your website by recording every mouse movement, keystroke, and click.

WebGazer.js logo WebGazer.js

Eye tracking on the browser
  • ScreenSquid Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-05
  • WebGazer.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-19

ScreenSquid features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    ScreenSquid offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise.
  • Comprehensive Features
    The platform provides a wide range of features such as screen recording, annotation tools, and real-time collaboration, catering to diverse user needs.
  • High-Quality Recording
    ScreenSquid supports high-resolution video recording, ensuring clarity and professionalism in recorded content.
  • Flexible Sharing Options
    Users can easily share their recordings via multiple platforms, enhancing collaboration and communication.
  • Regular Updates
    The development team frequently releases updates, ensuring the software keeps up with technological advancements and user feedback.

Possible disadvantages of ScreenSquid

  • Cost
    ScreenSquid may be more expensive than some competitors, which could be a barrier for individual users or small businesses with limited budgets.
  • Resource Intensive
    The software can be resource-intensive, potentially slowing down older or less powerful computers during use.
  • Occasional Technical Issues
    Some users have reported occasional bugs or glitches, affecting the reliability of the software in certain situations.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, mastering all the features of ScreenSquid may require some time and effort, especially for new users.
  • Limited Offline Access
    ScreenSquid's collaborative features are reliant on an internet connection, which can limit functionality in offline scenarios.

WebGazer.js features and specs

  • Open Source
    WebGazer.js is an open-source library, allowing developers to freely use, modify, and distribute the code, fostering collaboration and innovation.
  • Ease of Integration
    The library is designed to be easily integrated into web applications, requiring minimal setup and enabling quick implementation of eye-tracking features.
  • No Special Hardware Required
    WebGazer.js uses a web camera to perform eye-tracking, eliminating the need for specialized hardware, which makes it accessible to a broad audience.
  • Real-time Tracking
    The library provides real-time gaze tracking, making it suitable for interactive applications requiring immediate feedback.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    As a JavaScript library, WebGazer.js works across different browsers and platforms, increasing its usability in diverse environments.

Possible disadvantages of WebGazer.js

  • Accuracy Limitations
    The accuracy of WebGazer.js may not match that of dedicated eye-tracking hardware, which can limit its use in precise applications.
  • Environmental Dependency
    Lighting and camera quality can affect the performance of WebGazer.js, posing challenges in uncontrolled environments.
  • Browser Performance Variability
    The performance and accuracy of the library might vary between different browsers due to discrepancies in camera access and processing capabilities.
  • Privacy Concerns
    Using a webcam raises privacy issues, as it involves capturing video data from users, which may require clear consent and data handling policies.
  • Limited Functionality
    While useful for basic eye-tracking, WebGazer.js might lack the advanced features provided by specialized eye-tracking software or libraries.

ScreenSquid videos

No ScreenSquid videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

WebGazer.js videos

WebGazer.js: Scalable Webcam EyeTracking Using User Interactions

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ScreenSquid and WebGazer.js)
Web Analytics
43 43%
57% 57
AI
0 0%
100% 100
Heatmaps
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using ScreenSquid and WebGazer.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, WebGazer.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ScreenSquid mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of ScreenSquid yet. Tracking of ScreenSquid recommendations started around Mar 2021.

WebGazer.js mentions (5)

  • Building a realtime eye tracking experience with Supabase and WebGazer.js
    I had ran into WebGazer.js a while back when I first had the idea for this project. It's a very interesting project and works suprisingly well! - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Any way to detect a hand for touchless navigation?
    You could use something like https://webgazer.cs.brown.edu/ for reference, or tensorflow.js. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • A Drawing I've been working on since I finished the game.
    If you are looking for some extra ideas... Mmm... If I were to make something like this, I would display it in a webapp with a simple eye tracking system (like this one, for example) so that, when it doesn't detect anyone looking towards the screen, it automatically changes the background. It requires some work and coding experience, so I am not expecting anyone to actually realize it, but... Hey! If someone... Source: about 3 years ago
  • Controller for pain-free reviewing in MedSchool (Mac, iPad)
    Ankimote developer here. I was thinking about writing something to control Anki using this gaze tracking library, but I came to realize it would be slower than finger movements since you'd need to keep your gaze in an area for a second or two to avoid false positives. It also takes a good deal of effort to consciously focus your eyes at a small area of a screen, which would probably distract the user from thinking... Source: about 4 years ago
  • Webcam and browser eyetracking libraries?
    Do you know about JS libraries which can be used in the browser to perform eyetracking (gaze prediction) using a webcam? I was giving a look at the WebGazer JS but wanted to know if there are some other alternatives out there. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ScreenSquid and WebGazer.js, you can also consider the following products

Hotjar - The #1 Leader in Heatmaps, Recordings, Surveys & More. Sign up for a 15-day free trial and start learning from real user behavior today!

Eye Yoga - Improve eyesight, relieve eye strain and prevent presbyopia.

SessionCam - Watch recordings of website visitors to see usability issues that cause abandonment and reduce conversion. Generate heatmaps. Analyse conversion funnels.

FOVE - An eye tracking virtual reality headset (pre-launch)

Smartlook - Qualitative analytics for websites and mobile apps Start understanding the 'whys' of your users' behaviors with clear, visual insights. With session recordings and event tracking, you get the complete picture.

The Ultimate SEO Prompt Collection - Unlock Your SEO Potential: 50+ Proven ChatGPT Prompts