Software Alternatives & Startups

ScreenshotRun VS CaptureAPI.dev

Compare ScreenshotRun VS CaptureAPI.dev and see what are their differences

ScreenshotRun

Capture full-page and viewport screenshots via REST API. PNG, JPEG, WebP, PDF. Fast rendering, no browser setup. Start free \u2014 300 screenshots/month.

ScreenshotRun screenshot
Rating
0 reviews
CaptureAPI.dev

Screenshot & PDF API for Developers. Capture website screenshots, convert HTML to PDF, and generate OG images with a simple API call.

CaptureAPI.dev Landing page
Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Freemium $9 / Monthly (Starter)

Which is more popular?

Website Screenshots popularity
46% vs 54%
alternatives listed
13 vs 14

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

ScreenshotRun
CaptureAPI.dev
Website screenshotrun.com captureapi.dev
Pricing
Freemium $9 / Monthly (Starter) Official pricing
Company 2026 Startup from Spain
Listed in

About ScreenshotRun and CaptureAPI.dev

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

ScreenshotRun
CaptureAPI.dev

ScreenshotRun is a screenshot API built for developers who need reliable, fast page captures without managing headless browsers. What it does Full-page & viewport screenshots — capture entire pages or specific viewport sizes Multiple formats — PNG, JPEG, WebP, and PDF output Custom viewports...

Read more about ScreenshotRun

CaptureAPI is a developer-focused serverless API for capturing website screenshots (PNG, JPEG), converting HTML to PDF, and generating Open Graph images. Built on Playwright + Chromium, it supports 5 viewport presets (Mobile, Tablet, Desktop HD, 4K, Custom), CSS selector targeting, watermarks,...

Read more about CaptureAPI.dev

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

ScreenshotRun 5 features
CaptureAPI.dev 5 features
  • Full-page screenshots
    Capture entire scrollable pages
  • Output formats
    PNG, JPEG, WebP, PDF
  • Custom viewports
    Any width and height
  • REST API
    Simple HTTP calls, no SDK needed
  • Free tier
    300 screenshots/month
  • Output Formats
    PNG, JPEG, PDF, OG images
  • Free Tier
    200 screenshots/month, no card required
  • Engine
    Playwright + Chromium (serverless)
  • Viewport Presets
    Mobile, Tablet, Desktop HD, 4K, Custom
  • Batch Endpoint
    Multiple URLs per API call

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

ScreenshotRun
CaptureAPI.dev

No analysis of ScreenshotRun yet.

Overall verdict

  • I don't have verified, up-to-date information about CaptureAPI.dev specifically, so I can't confirm its quality, reliability, or reputation firsthand. Based on its name, it appears to be a website/screenshot capture API service, and my assessment is general rather than based on confirmed user reviews or benchmarks.

Why this product is good

  • If it functions as described (a screenshot/webpage capture API), such tools are generally useful for automating visual content generation
  • API-based capture services typically offer developer-friendly integration via REST endpoints
  • Many similar services offer features like PDF generation, full-page screenshots, and custom viewport sizing
  • Pricing for niche capture APIs is often more affordable than building in-house infrastructure

Recommended for

  • Developers needing to verify current pricing, uptime, and feature set directly from the provider before committing
  • Teams who should test the API with a free trial or sandbox environment if available
  • Users who should check independent reviews, GitHub mentions, or community feedback for real-world performance data
  • Businesses requiring SLA guarantees, who should confirm this directly with the vendor rather than relying on assumptions

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
ScreenshotRun
CaptureAPI.dev
46% 46%
54% 54%
0% 0%
100% 100%
50% 50%
50% 50%
100% 100%
API
0% 0%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing ScreenshotRun and CaptureAPI.dev.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

CaptureAPI.dev's answer:

  • Independent SaaS founders using CaptureAPI for OG image generation
  • Content and growth teams generating automated blog cover screenshots
  • Small B2B platforms archiving compliance documents (PDF + screenshot)
  • Side-project builders integrating preview images into their dashboards

Named customer references available on request as the user base grows.

What makes your product unique?

CaptureAPI.dev's answer:

CaptureAPI bundles website screenshots, HTML-to-PDF conversion, and OG image generation into a single predictable API endpoint. Unlike heavy headless-browser platforms, it offers a 200/month free tier, transparent flat-rate pricing, and a developer-first design with no per-call billing surprises.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

CaptureAPI.dev's answer:

Three reasons: (1) honest free tier — 200 captures/month, no credit card; (2) flat pricing ($9 / $29 / $79) instead of per-call confusion; (3) screenshot, PDF, and OG image generation all in one API rather than three separate services.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

CaptureAPI.dev's answer:

Indie developers, side-project builders, and small SaaS engineering teams who need a reliable screenshot/PDF/OG API without enterprise contracts. Common use cases: OG image generation, blog cover screenshots, automated archiving, and product preview generation for landing pages.

What's the story behind your product?

CaptureAPI.dev's answer:

CaptureAPI was built by an indie maker tired of stitching together Puppeteer scripts, paying enterprise prices for a single feature, and dealing with hidden rate-limit surprises. It launched in early 2026 as part of the DevToolsmith portfolio with the goal of offering screenshot, PDF, and OG generation under one developer-friendly API.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

CaptureAPI.dev's answer:

Next.js 16, TypeScript, Vercel Functions (Fluid Compute), Playwright for headless rendering, Sharp for image processing, Upstash Redis for rate limiting and caching, Stripe for billing, and Sentry for observability. Serverless on EU + US edge for low latency.

User comments

Share your experience with using ScreenshotRun and CaptureAPI.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Alternatives to ScreenshotRun and CaptureAPI.dev

When comparing ScreenshotRun and CaptureAPI.dev, you can also consider the following products.