Satis VS Gitlab Container Registry

Compare Satis VS Gitlab Container Registry and see what are their differences

Flagsmith

Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Satis

Satis is a simple static Composer repository generator

Gitlab Container Registry

Built on open source software, GitLab Container Registry isn't just a standalone registry; it's completely integrated with GitLab.

Landing page //
2023-07-11

Landing page //
2023-07-09

Satis

Website: github.com
$ Details

Edit details

Gitlab Container Registry

Website: about.gitlab.com
$ Details: -

Edit details

Satis features and specs

Custom Repository Creation
Satis allows you to create your own Composer repositories, which can host private or customized packages. This is useful for internal company projects or any situation where you want more control over the packages you use.
Simple Setup
Satis is relatively straightforward to set up and requires minimal configuration. This simplicity makes it accessible for teams without a dedicated DevOps department.
Lightweight
Being a simple PHP static file generator, Satis is lightweight and doesn’t require a large resource overhead to operate, making it efficient for smaller projects or limited server environments.
Secure Private Packages
Satis allows for the secure hosting of private packages, ensuring that internal or proprietary code is not exposed to the public and can be shared safely within an organization.
Composer Compatibility
Satis is fully compatible with Composer, ensuring that developers can seamlessly integrate it into their existing workflow without requiring significant changes or adaptations.

Possible disadvantages of Satis

Limited Feature Set
Satis is primarily a static file generator and does not offer advanced features such as package search, browsing, or user interfaces that more robust solutions might provide.
Manual Updates
Packages hosted on a Satis repository do not update automatically; it requires manual intervention to update the package listings whenever changes are made to the source packages.
No Dependency Management
Satis itself does not handle dependency management; it relies on Composer for that functionality. Satis is only for repository management, which might not suit all project needs.
Limited Scalability
While lightweight, Satis might not be ideal for large-scale operations or gigantic repositories with many dependencies and packages, as it doesn't inherently support scaling or load balancing mechanisms.
Lack of User Management
Satis does not offer built-in user management functionality, which means that any access restrictions or permissions need to be handled externally, potentially complicating integration with other systems.

Gitlab Container Registry features and specs

Integrated Workflow
GitLab Container Registry is seamlessly integrated with GitLab's CI/CD pipelines, providing an efficient workflow for building, testing, and deploying Docker images.
Security Features
It includes robust security features such as vulnerability scanning for container images, helping to minimize security risks by identifying vulnerabilities early.
User Management
GitLab's registry offers strong user and access management capabilities, allowing teams to define granular permissions and access controls for container images.
Cost Efficiency
For users already on a GitLab plan, the integrated container registry can be more cost-effective compared to external solutions, as it reduces the need for additional subscriptions or services.
Ease of Use
The registry's intuitive interface makes it easy for developers to manage container images without needing extensive knowledge of container technologies.

Possible disadvantages of Gitlab Container Registry

Storage Limitations
Depending on the GitLab plan, there might be limitations on storage space for container images, which can affect projects with large numbers of images or large-sized images.
Performance
In cases where GitLab servers experience high load, the performance of the container registry may degrade compared to dedicated container registry solutions.
Complexity with External Integrations
For teams using a variety of tools outside the GitLab ecosystem, integrating the GitLab Container Registry with external workflows and tools can be complex.
Learning Curve
Teams unfamiliar with GitLab may face a learning curve when adapting to its integrated container registry and its specific implementations and workflows.
Limited to GitLab Environment
The container registry is designed specifically for GitLab, which might not be ideal for organizations using different CI/CD solutions or preferring vendor-neutral tools.

Satis videos

+ Add

2002 Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6 Initiale Road Test & Review - Matty's Cars

Gitlab Container Registry videos

No Gitlab Container Registry videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Satis and Gitlab Container Registry)

Satis

Gitlab Container Registry

Package Manager

100 100%

Package Manager

0% 0

Code Collaboration

30 30%

Code Collaboration

70% 70

Developer Tools

56 56%

Developer Tools

44% 44

Sysadmin

0 0%

Sysadmin

100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Satis and Gitlab Container Registry. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Satis should be more popular than Gitlab Container Registry. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Satis mentions (5)

Need help with Installing Enlightn Pro
Note: Satis is a local repo repository — the pro code is likely not on github. They set up their own system to handle these repositories outside of github/packagist. Source: about 3 years ago
Private Packagist - has anyone used and can tell me if it might fit in my scenario?
If you want/need to self-host this internally, you can look at satis to create and self-host a repository. Since you need to add the packages manually, your security team can vet the code before adding it. There is a post on gitconnected on how to set this up: https://levelup.gitconnected.com/how-to-host-your-own-private-packagist-for-free-or-extremely-cheap-faf44eca3647. Source: about 3 years ago
Need a secured way to be able to use Composer
We have a private Satis instance. Our ITSec team reviews all packages before we add them to Satis. Packagist.com is available for us but the CI-CD servers can reach only the private Satis. Source: about 3 years ago
My own CMS/Tool - what is the best way to go about the usage in different projects?
My team and I use Satis to accomplish that. It's hosted on our servers and we can easily release new versions. Dependabot can even upgrade the dependencies if new ones are detected. Source: about 3 years ago
Do you use a private composer registry ? (Why / Why Not)
Composer supports multiple types of custom respositories, so you can host your own repository (with something like Satis), pay for a packagist.com private repository or even use a VCS repository to fetch packages directly from your private GIT repos. Source: over 3 years ago

Gitlab Container Registry mentions (1)

We Need to Talk About Docker Registries
An alternative to GitHub is GitLab (registry.gitlab.com), which has provided registry support for its free (public and private) repositories long before GitHub. The docs are also much better in my opinion, and the whole experience is tightly integrated with GitLab's CICD pipelines. This registry also needs login with a token. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago