Salesforce Lightning Platform VS Ember-cli

• User-Friendly Interface
  Salesforce Lightning offers a modern and intuitive user interface that is more visually appealing and easier to navigate compared to its predecessor, Salesforce Classic. This makes it easier for new users to learn and transition to the platform.
• Component-Based Architecture
  The platform's component-based framework allows developers to build reusable components, which can save time and enhance consistency across applications.
• Mobile Optimization
  Lightning is designed with mobile in mind, ensuring that applications built on this platform are mobile-responsive and can be accessed across various devices seamlessly.
• Enhanced Productivity
  Features such as drag-and-drop builders, pre-built components, and a robust set of customization options help developers and business users create applications efficiently, improving overall productivity.
• Integration Capabilities
  Lightning Platform supports integrations with a variety of other systems and applications through open APIs, allowing seamless data exchange and connectivity across platforms.

Possible disadvantages

• Complexity for Developers
  Developers accustomed to Salesforce Classic might face a steep learning curve when adapting to the Lightning Platform's new methodologies and tools.
• Performance Issues
  Some users have reported slower performance speeds with Lightning, especially when dealing with highly customized implementations or large volumes of data.
• Limited Compatibility
  Certain features and customizations available in Salesforce Classic may not yet be fully supported or transferred to Lightning, potentially limiting functionality for some users.
• Higher Implementation Costs
  Transitioning to Lightning may involve significant upfront costs due to training, redevelopment of existing features, and customization, which can be a barrier for smaller organizations.
• Frequent Updates
  While regular updates can be beneficial, they may also result in compatibility issues or require frequent adjustments to custom components, which can be challenging to manage.

• Convention over Configuration
  Ember-cli enforces strong conventions for file structure, naming, and project organization, which reduces decision fatigue and makes it easier for developers to jump between different Ember projects with minimal onboarding time.
• Built-in Tooling
  Comes with a robust set of built-in tools including a development server, testing framework integration (QUnit), asset compilation, and live reload, reducing the need to manually configure and integrate third-party build tools.
• Addon Ecosystem
  Ember-cli supports a rich ecosystem of addons that can be easily installed and integrated into projects, allowing developers to extend functionality without reinventing the wheel for common features.
• Blueprints and Generators
  Provides powerful generator commands (blueprints) that scaffold components, routes, models, and other application pieces quickly, speeding up development and ensuring consistency across the codebase.
• Stable Long-term Support
  Ember-cli follows Ember's release cycle with clear LTS (Long Term Support) versions, providing stability and predictability for teams maintaining large applications over time.

Possible disadvantages

• Steep Learning Curve
  The strict conventions and unique architecture of Ember-cli can be difficult for newcomers to learn, especially those coming from more flexible frameworks or with no prior Ember experience.
• Smaller Community Compared to Alternatives
  Compared to tools like Vite, Webpack, or CRA used with React/Vue, Ember-cli has a smaller community and ecosystem, which can mean fewer third-party resources, tutorials, and community-driven troubleshooting.
• Build Performance
  For large applications, Ember-cli's build process can become slow, and while improvements have been made with embroider, some developers still report slower build times compared to more modern bundlers.
• Rigid Structure
  The opinionated nature of Ember-cli, while helpful for consistency, can feel restrictive for developers who prefer more flexibility in structuring their applications or adopting non-standard patterns.
• Migration Complexity
  Upgrading between major Ember-cli versions or migrating to newer build systems like Embroider can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for older or heavily customized applications.

No analysis of Salesforce Lightning Platform yet.

Salesforce Lightning Platform Overview Demo

More videos

No Ember-cli videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

• 10 Best Low-Code Development Platforms in 2020
  www.softwaretestinghelp.com · Nov 2020

  OutSystems provides the platform for developers to easily deliver and edit those applications. Salesforce Lightning is a suite of tools for developing business apps. Zoho Creator low code development platform can be...

• Best Google App Maker alternatives in 2020
  retool.com · Apr 2020

  For small to medium sized businesses, it’s hard to pass up Retool for flexibility and price. While not free, AppSheet is similarly low-priced at $5 per user per month to begin with and is already integrated within...

• The 11 Best Low-Code Development Platforms
  www.xplenty.com · Feb 2020

  The Salesforce Lightning solution combines data with RAD. It has all the power of Salesforce with low-code app development.Salesforce Lightning Platform combines tools such as App Builder, Lightning Flow,...

We have no reviews of Ember-cli yet. Be the first one to post

Tracking Salesforce Lightning Platform since Mar 2021.

• Help! Why does chrome console inner text and my program inner text not return the same values? (spent nearly the whole day trying to extract an element). Turned to reddit as its always had the best community. Any help is MASSIVELY appreciated. Puppeteer!!

  The webpage is LinkedIn.com. While this isn’t a framework, I know that are using https://cli.emberjs.com/release/. Source: about 5 years ago