Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

runc VS devd

Compare runc VS devd and see what are their differences

runc logo runc

CLI tool for spawning and running containers according to the OCI specification - opencontainers/runc

devd logo devd

A local web server for developers
  • runc Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-21
  • devd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-30

runc features and specs

  • Standardization
    runc is part of the Open Containers Initiative (OCI), promoting standardization across container runtimes. This ensures interoperability and broad community support.
  • Lightweight
    As a lightweight and fast CLI tool, runc provides a minimal runtime for environments where resource efficiency is critical.
  • Security
    runc adheres to principles of secure software development and incorporates Linux kernel features like namespaces and cgroups to enhance security.
  • Broad Adoption
    As the reference implementation for OCI, runc is widely adopted and tested in production environments, ensuring reliability.
  • Flexibility
    runc offers the flexibility to handle low-level container configurations, making it suitable for advanced users needing granular control.

Possible disadvantages of runc

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The low-level nature of runc can be daunting for beginners who might prefer higher-level tools like Docker that abstract away complexities.
  • Minimalist Design
    While its simplicity is an advantage, runc lacks some of the advanced features and orchestration capabilities found in other container platforms.
  • Manual Configurations
    Users need to manually handle configurations, which can be error-prone and time-consuming compared to automated solutions.
  • Ecosystem Integration
    runc does not provide direct integration with tools and platforms by default, requiring additional setup for comprehensive ecosystem support.
  • Limited Features
    Compared to complete container platforms, runc offers fewer built-in features, requiring supplementary tools to achieve similar functionalities.

devd features and specs

  • Live Reload
    devd automatically refreshes the browser when a file change is detected, which improves development workflow efficiency by reducing manual reloads.
  • Simple Setup
    Installing and running devd requires minimal setup, making it accessible and easy to use for developers looking for quick local server setup.
  • HTTPS Support
    devd supports HTTPS out of the box, allowing developers to test their applications in a secure environment without extra configuration.
  • Proxying Capabilities
    devd can act as a reverse proxy, enabling complex setups where requests can be routed to different backends, suitable for microservices architectures.
  • Cross-platform
    As a Go application, devd can run on multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it highly versatile for different development environments.

Possible disadvantages of devd

  • Limited Advanced Features
    devd focuses on simplicity, which might lead to a lack of advanced server features found in more robust solutions like live data manipulation.
  • Niche User Base
    As devd is not as widely used as other local servers, community support and resources may be less abundant compared to more popular alternatives.
  • Lack of Built-in Authentication
    devd does not have built-in authentication mechanisms, which might necessitate additional setup or external solutions for development environments requiring user authentication.
  • Single-Purpose Tool
    devd is mainly a static file server with some live reload and proxy capabilities, which may not be sufficient for more complex web application setups requiring server-side logic.

runc videos

2/21/19 RunC Vulnerability Gives Root Access on Container Systems| AT&T ThreatTraq

More videos:

  • Review - Demo MONEY,TIME - RunC

devd videos

No devd videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to runc and devd)
Web Servers
69 69%
31% 31
Web And Application Servers
Load Balancer / Reverse Proxy
Web Application Bundler
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using runc and devd. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, runc should be more popular than devd. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

runc mentions (11)

  • Setup multi node kubernetes cluster using kubeadm
    For kubeadm , kubetlet , kubectl should same version package in this lab I used v1.31 to have 1.31.7 References: Https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/networking/ports-and-protocols/ Https://kubernetes.io/docs/setup/production-environment/tools/kubeadm/install-kubeadm/ Https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/releases/... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Comparing 3 Docker container runtimes - Runc, gVisor and Kata Containers
    Previously I wrote about the multiple variants of Docker and also the dependencies behind the Docker daemon. One of the dependencies was the container runtime called runc. That is what creates the usual containers we are all familiar with. When you use Docker, this is the default runtime, which is understandable since it was started by Docker, Inc. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • You run containers, not dockers - Discussing Docker variants, components and versioning
    Now we have dockerd which uses containerd, but containerd will not create containers directly. It needs a runtime and the default runtime is runc, but that can be changed. Containerd actually doesn't have to know the parameters of the runtime. There is a shim process between containerd and runc, so containerd knows the parameters of the shim, and the shim knows the parameters of runc or other runtimes. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in Software Products
    It's interesting that, in light of things like this, you still see large software companies adding support for new components written in non-memory safe languages (e.g. C) As an example Red Hat OpenShift added support for crun(https://github.com/containers/crun), which is written in C as an alternative to runc, which is written in Go( - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • Why did the Krustlet project die?
    Yeah, runtimeClass lets you specify which CRI plugin you want based on what you have available. Here's an example from the containerd documentation - you could have one node that can run containers under standard runc, gvisor, kata containers, or WASM. Without runtimeClass, you'd need either some form of custom solution or four differently configured nodes to run those different runtimes. That's how krustlet did... Source: over 3 years ago
View more

devd mentions (5)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing runc and devd, you can also consider the following products

Docker Hub - Docker Hub is a cloud-based registry service

nginx - A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.

Apache Thrift - An interface definition language and communication protocol for creating cross-language services.

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

Podman - Simple debugging tool for pods and images

lighttpd - A secure, fast, compliant, and very flexible web-server that has been optimized for high-performance environments