
RSSMailer
Publicate
DatoRSS Search Engine
RSS API
Kill the Newsletter!
Winds
Mailtrain
RSS with human curation

Exercise dataset for fitness apps: transparent background, animations, no subscription

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, RSS3 seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 10 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | rss3.io | repdb.co |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of RSS3 yet.
RepDB is a one-time-purchase exercise dataset with animations for developers building fitness and workout apps — not a subscription, not a rate-limited API. You download the data once and own it: JSON (and SQLite on the higher tier), WebP images, and full EN/DE/ES translations, with no...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing RSS3 and RepDB.
RepDB's answer:
RepDB is sold as a one-time download, not a metered API — you own the JSON/SQLite data and WebP images outright, with no rate limits, no per-request billing, and no risk of the vendor cutting off access. It's also the only dataset in this space with EN/DE/ES translations, transparent (alpha-channel) images with no watermark, muscle-group highlighting, safety/goal tags, and looping animations on the higher tier.
RepDB's answer:
RepDB grew out of a consumer workout app its creator was building solo. Sourcing exercise images and data meant either paying for a subscription API with usage caps and no caching rights, or producing everything from scratch. The illustrated, multi-language dataset was built for us first, then split out as its own product once it became clear other indie developers had the same problem and preferred to buy the data outright rather than rent it through an API.
RepDB's answer:
Most alternatives are subscription APIs — you pay monthly, you're capped on requests, and ExerciseDB's terms of use explicitly forbid caching or storing the data at all, so every image render is a live paid API call. RepDB is the opposite: pay once, download the files, self-host with zero ongoing dependency. It's also the only option offering true DE/ES localization and transparent images instead of a white box behind every exercise.
RepDB's answer:
Solo developers and small teams building fitness or workout-tracking apps (iOS, Android, web) who need licensed exercise images and structured exercise data, but don't want to build their own media pipeline or depend on a rate-limited third-party API.
Share your experience with using RSS3 and RepDB. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


I started to use Follow [0][1], which uses RSSHub [2] and RSS3 [3] in addition to classic RSS. [0]: https://follow.is/ [1]: https://github.com/RSSNext/follow [3]: https://rss3.io/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
The RSS3 website(rss3.io) itself is powered by the same API. Type in any ENS and try it out. Source: almost 4 years ago
Here I want to share a method that is free and platformless, combing RSS3.io , a web3 RSS subscription service, and NFT whale ENS information from NFTGO: https://nftgo.io/whale-tracking/list. Source: about 4 years ago
Tracking RepDB since Jul 2026.
When comparing RSS3 and RepDB, you can also consider the following products.

A search engine for RSS feeds 🗞️
Compare DatoRSS Search Engine to RSS3 or RepDB:

Convert & subscribe to RSS, ATOM and JSON-Feeds via API ⚡️ Get webhooks whenever there is a new entry in a Feed.
Compare RSS API to RSS3 or RepDB:

Convert newsletters into RSS feeds
Compare Kill the Newsletter! to RSS3 or RepDB: