Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

RootCause VS TrackJS

Compare RootCause VS TrackJS and see what are their differences

RootCause logo RootCause

Record, Replay and Reproduce JavaScript Errors

TrackJS logo TrackJS

JavaScript Error Tracking for Modern Web Applications
  • RootCause Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-20
  • TrackJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-27

RootCause features and specs

  • Comprehensive Bug Tracking
    RootCause provides detailed insights into bugs and issues, enabling developers to quickly identify and resolve problems in their web applications.
  • Session Replay
    This feature allows developers to replay user sessions to understand the precise context and steps leading to an error or issue, improving debugging efficiency.
  • Performance Monitoring
    RootCause offers real-time performance monitoring capabilities, helping developers optimize their applications for better user experiences.
  • Error Notifications
    The platform provides instant alerts and notifications about errors and issues, allowing teams to address problems promptly.
  • Ease of Integration
    RootCause can be easily integrated with existing development workflows and tools, enhancing its practicality and utility in real-world scenarios.

Possible disadvantages of RootCause

  • Pricing Structure
    Some users may find the pricing to be on the higher side, especially for small teams or individual developers.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its powerful features, new users might experience a learning curve before fully leveraging all the capabilities of the platform.
  • Feature Complexity
    The multitude of features offered might be overwhelming for small projects that do not require such extensive functionality.
  • Limited Offline Functionality
    RootCause relies heavily on internet connectivity, which could be a limitation for teams working in areas with unstable internet access.
  • Compatibility Issues
    There might be occasional compatibility issues with certain browsers or older web technologies.

TrackJS features and specs

  • Real-time Error Tracking
    TrackJS provides real-time monitoring and alerting of JavaScript errors, allowing developers to quickly identify and address issues as they occur in live environments.
  • Detailed Error Reports
    The service offers comprehensive error reports with detailed stack traces and metadata, helping developers understand the context of errors for more efficient debugging.
  • User-friendly Interface
    TrackJS features an intuitive and easy-to-navigate dashboard, making it accessible even for developers who may not be familiar with error tracking tools.
  • Integrations
    The platform supports various integrations with popular development tools and services such as Slack, GitHub, and Jira, enabling seamless workflow enhancements.
  • Performance Impact
    TrackJS is designed to have minimal performance impact on your application, ensuring that error tracking does not degrade user experience.

Possible disadvantages of TrackJS

  • Pricing
    TrackJS may be considered expensive for smaller teams or projects, as the cost can add up depending on the level of service required.
  • Customization
    While TrackJS provides a robust set of features out-of-the-box, it may lack the level of customization or flexibility needed for specific use cases or complex applications.
  • Limited Free Tier
    The free tier of TrackJS may have limitations in terms of features and data usage, which could be restrictive for some users looking for a more comprehensive solution.
  • Dependency on External Service
    Using TrackJS introduces a dependency on an external service for error tracking, which could be a concern for organizations with strict data policies or those preferring self-hosted solutions.

RootCause videos

No RootCause videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

TrackJS videos

Redux TrackJS Logger

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RootCause and TrackJS)
Error Tracking
24 24%
76% 76
Exception Monitoring
26 26%
74% 74
Crash Reporting
33 33%
67% 67
Monitoring Tools
23 23%
77% 77

User comments

Share your experience with using RootCause and TrackJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, TrackJS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RootCause mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of RootCause yet. Tracking of RootCause recommendations started around Mar 2021.

TrackJS mentions (1)

  • First 6 months with eBay/Adevinta
    Holding a hand on a pulse of metrics for errors;. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RootCause and TrackJS, you can also consider the following products

Sentry.io - From error tracking to performance monitoring, developers can see what actually matters, solve quicker, and learn continuously about their applications - from the frontend to the backend.

FancyTrack - JavaScript Error Tracking library from

Rollbar - Rollbar collects errors that happen in your application, notifies you, and analyzes them so you can debug and fix them. Ruby, Python, PHP, Node.js, JavaScript, and Flash libraries available.

BugSnag - Not all bugs are worth fixing. Prioritize and fix software bugs that matter while improving software stability with every release.

Errsole - Collect, store, and visualize logs with a single module

Firebase Crashlytics - The most powerful, yet lightest weight crash reporting solution for iOS and Android developers. | Crashlytics