Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Restic VS Hazel

Compare Restic VS Hazel and see what are their differences

Restic

Easy: Doing backups should be a frictionless process, otherwise you are tempted to skip it.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Alternatives Is it good?
Hazel

Lighweight update server for Electron apps

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
Sendaway.co
Send files and text between devices with a simple 6-digit code. No account, email or shared link required. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Restic seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 194 times since March 2021.

social mentions
194 vs 0
Backup popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
178 vs 134

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Restic
Hazel
Website restic.net github.com
Pricing
Open source
—
Company Startup from Germany —
Listed in
Backup Backup Automation Online Backup DevOps Tools Cloud Storage File Sharing And Backup +3
Image Optimisation File Management Image Editing Information Organization +1

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Restic 7 features
Hazel 5 features
  • Deduplication
    Restic has built-in deduplication, which ensures that only unique data is stored, reducing backup size and saving storage space.
  • Encryption
    Restic provides top-notch encryption (AES-256 and RSA-4096 by default), ensuring data security during storage and transfer.
  • Cross-platform
    Restic is compatible with multiple operating systems, including Linux, macOS, and Windows, providing flexibility and ease of use across different environments.
  • Efficient Backups
    Restic performs incremental backups, ensuring that only changes made since the last backup are saved, which makes the process faster and conserves bandwidth.
  • Simplicity
    Restic is designed to be easy to use with a straightforward command-line interface, reducing the learning curve for new users.
  • Multiple Storage Backends
    Restic supports a variety of storage backends, including local disk, SFTP, Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, and Microsoft Azure, providing versatility and options for users.
  • Open Source
    Restic is open-source, allowing users to review the source code, contribute to the project, and avoid vendor lock-in.

Possible disadvantages

  • No Graphical User Interface (GUI)
    Restic primarily relies on a command-line interface. Users who prefer a GUI may find it less accessible or user-friendly.
  • No Granular Scheduling
    Restic does not have built-in scheduling capabilities, requiring users to set up their own cron jobs or use third-party scheduling tools for automated backups.
  • Learning Curve
    Users unfamiliar with command-line tools may find Restic's interface challenging to learn and use effectively.
  • Limited Restore Features
    While Restic is excellent at creating backups, it has fewer options for granular or flexible restore operations compared to some competitors.
  • Performance Issues on Large Repositories
    Although efficient, Restic can experience performance degradation when handling very large repositories, potentially slowing down backup and restore operations.
  • Easy Integration
    Hazel is designed to be easily integrated into existing Electron applications, providing a straightforward way to manage updates for desktop apps.
  • Auto-update functionality
    Hazel provides built-in support for automatic updates, which can greatly enhance the user experience by ensuring that end-users always have the latest version without manual intervention.
  • Simple Configuration
    The setup and configuration of Hazel are relatively simple, making it accessible for developers who may not have extensive experience with update systems.
  • GitHub Releases Support
    Hazel is tightly integrated with GitHub releases, allowing developers to use GitHub as a distribution server, which simplifies the release process.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project under the Vercel organization, Hazel benefits from community contributions and transparent development practices.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Customization
    While Hazel is easy to set up, it offers limited customization options compared to more complex update management solutions, which could be a drawback for advanced use cases.
  • Dependency on GitHub
    Hazel's reliance on GitHub for release hosting may be a limitation for teams that use other repository hosting services or prefer to host their updates independently.
  • Scale Limitations
    For larger applications or those with significant distribution needs, Hazel might not scale as effectively as more robust, enterprise-grade update management systems.
  • Maintenance and Updates
    The frequency and responsiveness of updates and maintenance can be inconsistent, which may impact its reliability if critical issues arise.
  • Compatibility
    Hazel is primarily designed for Electron applications and may not be suitable or easily adaptable for non-Electron environments.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Restic
Hazel

Overall verdict

  • Restic is considered a good choice for individuals or organizations seeking secure and efficient backup solutions. Its performance, combined with strong encryption and cross-platform support, makes it a reliable option. However, like any tool, it depends on user needs and specific backup requirements. Some users may find that advanced configurations require more manual setup compared to more commercial solutions.

Why this product is good

  • Restic is a free and open-source backup software that is appreciated for its simplicity, security, and cross-platform capability. It's designed with a focus on being easy to use, while providing fast and secure backups. One of its key features is encryption, ensuring that all the data is encrypted at rest and in transit. Additionally, it supports deduplication, which helps in minimizing storage space usage efficiently. Restic also offers support for multiple storage backends, including local disks, SFTP servers, major cloud providers, and more.

Recommended for

  • Individuals looking for a simple and secure backup solution
  • Small to medium-sized businesses needing cross-platform backup options
  • IT professionals who prefer open-source software
  • Users who require data deduplication to save on storage costs
  • Developers and system administrators who prefer command-line tools

Overall verdict

  • Hazel is a well-regarded tool for developers looking to implement distributed computing solutions. It is particularly favored for its reliability and performance in handling complex data processing tasks. Hence, Hazel can be considered a good choice for projects that require distributed architecture.

Why this product is good

  • Hazel is considered good because it acts as an open-source framework for building robust and scalable distributed applications and services. It's known for its distributed architecture, support for real-time data processing, and ease of integration with other tools and systems. Furthermore, Hazel offers high availability, automated failover, and partitioned data structures, making it suitable for critical applications.

Recommended for

  • Developers building distributed applications
  • Teams needing real-time data processing capabilities
  • Systems architects looking for scalable infrastructure solutions
  • Projects requiring automated failover and high availability

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Restic 2 videos + Add
Hazel 3 videos + Add

Making Backups From The Linux Command Line: Restic Review

More videos

  • - Using Restic for backups - Quick and Easy

Big Bulky Blast from the Past - MG 1/100 Gundam TR-1 Hazel Review - MECHA GAIKOTSU

More videos

  • - HGUC Gundam TR-1 Hazel Custom (Review)
  • - HGUC Gundam TR-1 Hazel II (Review)

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Restic
Hazel
100% 100%
Backup
0% 0%
0% 0%
File Management
100% 100%
100% 100%
Cloud Storage
0% 0%
0% 0%
Productivity
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Restic and Hazel. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Restic no reviews yet
Hazel no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Hazel yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Restic 194 mentions
Hazel 0 mentions
  • Backups Aren't Simple
    So is apparently making readable site. Software like https://restic.net/ does a good job. Few choices of backend Accepts stuff from pipe too so you can just pipe mysqldump or pg_dumpall without intermediate files Very decent options for... - Source: Hacker News / 20 days ago
  • Minimal Homelab Server with Alpine Linux
    I use Backrest, a web UI for Restic, to back up to Backblaze B2. Everything runs in Docker. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • The 3-2-1 Backup Setup for Self-Hosters: restic + Backblaze B2
    In this guide I'll set up the backup system I actually run: restic pushing encrypted snapshots to Backblaze B2, automated on a timer, monitored, and — the part everyone skips — verified with a real restore. It works the same on a €5 VPS... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

View more

Tracking Hazel since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Restic and Hazel

When comparing Restic and Hazel, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...