Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Responsively VS SOAPEngine

Compare Responsively VS SOAPEngine and see what are their differences

Responsively

Develop responsive web-apps 5x faster!

Rating
5.0 · 1 review
Pricing
Open source Free Free trial
Alternatives Is it good?
SOAPEngine

This generic SOAP client allows you to access web services using a your iOS app, Mac OS X app and AppleTV app. - priore/SOAPEngine

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
you.bot
One API for 80+ AI models — LLM, image, video & music — priced up to 80% below the official APIs. Pay only for successful calls; failed runs refunded; credits never expire. sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Responsively seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 46 times since March 2021.

social mentions
46 vs 0
Design Tools popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Responsively
SOAPEngine
Website responsively.app github.com
Pricing
Open source Free Free trial
—
Platforms
Windows Mac OSX Linux
—
Company 2020 —
Listed in
Design Tools Developer Tools Tech Website Builder Responsive Website Design +3
Mobile Development

About Responsively and SOAPEngine

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Responsively
SOAPEngine

A web browser that aids responsive web app development. Preview all target screens in a single window side-by-side. Brings down your development time. Use your already-familiar dev-tools from the browser. No additional learning curve!

Read more about Responsively

No description of SOAPEngine yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Responsively 6 features
SOAPEngine 4 features
  • Multi-device Preview
    Allows simultaneous preview of a website on different device screen sizes, facilitating responsive design testing and debugging.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, it allows for community contributions, transparency, and no licensing fees.
  • Sync Scrolling and Clicks
    Enables synchronized scrolling and clicking across all previews, making it easier to test interactions and layouts uniformly.
  • Customizable Viewports
    Users can add, remove, or adjust predefined viewports to match specific device requirements or test cases.
  • Lightweight and Fast
    Designed to be performant and quick, reducing the overhead on development machines and improving productivity.
  • Cross-platform
    Compatible with multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, ensuring broader user adoption.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Browser Support
    May not offer the same level of browser compatibility testing as dedicated tools like BrowserStack or Sauce Labs.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users might require some time to get accustomed to the interface and functionalities compared to more straightforward testing tools.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running multiple device previews simultaneously can consume considerable system resources, which might slow down other tasks.
  • No Cloud Integration
    Lacks integration with cloud services for remote testing, unlike some paid alternatives.
  • Dependence on Electron
    As an Electron-based app, it might have a larger memory footprint compared to native applications.
  • Comprehensive SOAP Support
    SOAPEngine provides robust and thorough support for SOAP-based web services, making it easier for developers to integrate complex SOAP operations in their applications.
  • iOS and macOS Compatibility
    It is designed to work seamlessly with iOS and macOS platforms, ensuring that developers can build applications across Apple’s ecosystem using SOAP services.
  • Easy Integration
    SOAPEngine is relatively straightforward to integrate into existing projects, providing a variety of functionalities needed to quickly start consuming SOAP web services.
  • Automatic XML Parsing
    The library handles the parsing of XML responses automatically, which simplifies the developer's job by abstracting away the complexity of handling XML data.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited to Apple Platforms
    SOAPEngine is specifically designed for iOS and macOS, making it unsuitable for developers targeting cross-platform solutions that include Android or other systems.
  • Outdated Documentation
    Some users might find the documentation for SOAPEngine outdated or lacking clarity, potentially complicating the learning curve for new users.
  • Dependency on SOAP Protocol
    As SOAP is an older protocol compared to REST, developers using SOAPEngine are tied to using SOAP services, which might not be the best fit for newer web service designs.
  • Performance Overheads
    SOAP can introduce performance overheads due to its verbose nature and the XML format, potentially affecting the performance of applications using SOAPEngine.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Responsively
SOAPEngine

No analysis of Responsively yet.

Overall verdict

  • SOAPEngine is a solid choice for developers needing SOAP/XML web service integration in Apple ecosystem apps (iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS), offering a mature, well-documented library that simplifies working with legacy SOAP-based backends without requiring extensive boilerplate code.

Why this product is good

  • Provides a straightforward Objective-C/Swift API for consuming SOAP web services, abstracting away much of the complexity of manual XML parsing and request construction
  • Supports multiple Apple platforms (iOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS) making it versatile for cross-platform Apple development
  • Actively maintained with a track record on GitHub, giving developers confidence in its reliability
  • Handles common SOAP complexities like WSDL parsing, authentication, and complex data types
  • Good documentation and examples make it accessible for developers unfamiliar with SOAP intricacies
  • Reduces development time when integrating with older enterprise systems that still rely on SOAP APIs

Recommended for

  • iOS/macOS developers who need to integrate with legacy enterprise SOAP web services
  • Teams maintaining apps that connect to backend systems using WSDL-based services
  • Developers who want to avoid writing manual XML parsing and SOAP envelope construction from scratch
  • Projects requiring cross-platform support across multiple Apple devices with SOAP backend communication
  • Enterprise app developers working in industries (banking, healthcare, government) where SOAP remains a common integration standard

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Responsively 3 videos + Add
SOAPEngine 0 videos + Add

Responsively App Demo

More videos

  • - Responsively Style Checkboxes, freeCodeCamp Bootstrap Review, lesson 16
  • - Line up Form Elements Responsively with Bootstrap, freeCodeCamp Bootstrap Review, lesson 18

No SOAPEngine videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Responsively
SOAPEngine
100% 100%
Design Tools
0% 0%
0% 0%
Mobile Development
100% 100%
100% 100%
Developer Tools
0% 0%
100% 100%
Browser Testing
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Responsively and SOAPEngine. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Responsively 5.0 · 1 review
SOAPEngine no reviews yet

We have no reviews of SOAPEngine yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Responsively 46 mentions
SOAPEngine 0 mentions

View more

Tracking SOAPEngine since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Responsively and SOAPEngine

When comparing Responsively and SOAPEngine, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...