Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Responsively VS Animate.css

Compare Responsively VS Animate.css and see what are their differences

Responsively

Develop responsive web-apps 5x faster!

Rating
5.0 · 1 review
Pricing
Open source Free Free trial
Alternatives Is it good?
Animate.css

Animate.css is a cross-browser library of CSS animations.

Rating
0 reviews
Alternatives Is it good?
ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Responsively seems to be a lot more popular than Animate.css. While we know about 46 links to Responsively, we've tracked only 1 mention of Animate.css.

social mentions
46 vs 1
Design Tools popularity
73% vs 27%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 204

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Responsively
Animate.css
Website responsively.app daneden.github.io
Pricing
Open source Free Free trial
—
Platforms
Windows Mac OSX Linux
—
Company 2020 —
Listed in
Design Tools Developer Tools Tech Website Builder Responsive Website Design +3
Developer Tools Design Tools CSS Framework Web Frameworks +1

About Responsively and Animate.css

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Responsively
Animate.css

A web browser that aids responsive web app development. Preview all target screens in a single window side-by-side. Brings down your development time. Use your already-familiar dev-tools from the browser. No additional learning curve!

Read more about Responsively

No description of Animate.css yet.

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Responsively 6 features
Animate.css 5 features
  • Multi-device Preview
    Allows simultaneous preview of a website on different device screen sizes, facilitating responsive design testing and debugging.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, it allows for community contributions, transparency, and no licensing fees.
  • Sync Scrolling and Clicks
    Enables synchronized scrolling and clicking across all previews, making it easier to test interactions and layouts uniformly.
  • Customizable Viewports
    Users can add, remove, or adjust predefined viewports to match specific device requirements or test cases.
  • Lightweight and Fast
    Designed to be performant and quick, reducing the overhead on development machines and improving productivity.
  • Cross-platform
    Compatible with multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, ensuring broader user adoption.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Browser Support
    May not offer the same level of browser compatibility testing as dedicated tools like BrowserStack or Sauce Labs.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users might require some time to get accustomed to the interface and functionalities compared to more straightforward testing tools.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running multiple device previews simultaneously can consume considerable system resources, which might slow down other tasks.
  • No Cloud Integration
    Lacks integration with cloud services for remote testing, unlike some paid alternatives.
  • Dependence on Electron
    As an Electron-based app, it might have a larger memory footprint compared to native applications.
  • Ease of Use
    Animate.css provides a wide range of preset animations that can be easily implemented by adding class names to HTML elements. This eliminates the need for custom CSS animations or JavaScript, thus saving time and effort.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    The animations in Animate.css work across all modern browsers, ensuring a consistent and reliable experience for users regardless of the browser they use.
  • Open Source
    Animate.css is an open-source library, meaning it's free to use and contributions from the community help keep it updated and improve its functionality over time.
  • Lightweight
    The library is relatively lightweight, especially if you only include the specific animations you need, which helps keep page load times low.
  • Customizable
    Although it comes with a wide range of preset animations, Animate.css allows for customization. Developers can easily modify the CSS to fit their specific needs.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited to CSS Animations
    Animate.css only includes CSS-based animations. For more complex interactions or animations that require JavaScript, another library or custom code would be necessary.
  • Overhead for Unused Animations
    By importing the entire library, you might include many animations that are not used, leading to unnecessary overhead. Selective imports or custom builds are required to avoid this.
  • Performance
    Frequent or complex animations can lead to performance issues, especially on lower-end devices. Developers need to be mindful of how often animations are triggered and their impact on performance.
  • Limited Control
    Using pre-defined animations means less control over specific nuances of the animations. For more intricate or highly customized animations, a more flexible solution may be needed.
  • Potential Conflicts
    There can be potential conflicts with existing CSS in your project, especially if the same class names are used, leading to unintended side effects.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Responsively
Animate.css

No analysis of Responsively yet.

Overall verdict

  • Animate.css is generally considered a good tool for adding animations to web projects. It is reliable, simple to use, and widely supported by the development community. However, for highly customized animations or when trying to minimize the performance footprint, custom solutions may be more appropriate.

Why this product is good

  • Animate.css is a well-known library for CSS animations. It is widely used due to its ease of integration, comprehensive collection of animations, and minimal overhead. It allows developers to quickly incorporate animations into their projects without having to write complex CSS from scratch.

Recommended for

  • Web developers looking for quick, easy-to-use animation solutions.
  • Projects that need standard animations with minimal setup.
  • Developers who prefer using established libraries with active community support.
  • Designers who want to add basic animations without deep CSS knowledge.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Responsively 3 videos + Add
Animate.css 0 videos + Add

Responsively App Demo

More videos

  • - Responsively Style Checkboxes, freeCodeCamp Bootstrap Review, lesson 16
  • - Line up Form Elements Responsively with Bootstrap, freeCodeCamp Bootstrap Review, lesson 18

No Animate.css videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Responsively
Animate.css
73% 73%
Design Tools
27% 27%
72% 72%
Developer Tools
28% 28%
100% 100%
Browser Testing
0% 0%
0% 0%
Languages & Frameworks
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Responsively and Animate.css. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Responsively 5.0 · 1 review
Animate.css no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Animate.css yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Responsively 46 mentions
Animate.css 1 mention

View more

  • 3 Easy Ways to Add Animation to your Angular Applications
    An advantage of this approach is that it lets us utilize any CSS animation library that works off of the same concept of adding and removing classes. Some of the more popular libraries that work this way are animate.css and magic.css.... - Source: dev.to / about 5 years ago

Alternatives to Responsively and Animate.css

When comparing Responsively and Animate.css, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...