Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Responsive Viewer VS ManualTesting.dev

Compare Responsive Viewer VS ManualTesting.dev and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Responsive Viewer logo Responsive Viewer

View multiple screen dimensions in one view

ManualTesting.dev logo ManualTesting.dev

Manual Testing for Developers - Test Management Tool for developers and startups
  • Responsive Viewer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-11-18
  • ManualTesting.dev Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-26

Responsive Viewer features and specs

  • Device Simulation
    Responsive Viewer allows users to simulate how their website looks on various device screen sizes, helping ensure a responsive design.
  • Multiple Viewports
    Users can view how their website appears on multiple devices simultaneously, making it easier to spot layout issues across different screens.
  • Custom Device Support
    The tool provides options to add and preview custom devices, offering flexibility for developers targeting specific screen resolutions.
  • Real-time Refresh
    Responsive Viewer offers real-time browser refresh, allowing developers to see changes instantly as they edit code.

Possible disadvantages of Responsive Viewer

  • Limited to Google Chrome
    Since it is a Chrome extension, it's only available for Google Chrome users, limiting its accessibility for those using other browsers.
  • Performance Overheads
    Rendering multiple viewports simultaneously can lead to increased CPU and memory usage, potentially slowing down performance.
  • No Offline Use
    Responsive Viewer requires an internet connection to function, which might be inconvenient for developers working offline.
  • Extension Conflicts
    There might be conflicts with other browser extensions, potentially causing unexpected behavior during its use.

ManualTesting.dev features and specs

  • Focused on Manual Testing
    ManualTesting.dev is specifically dedicated to manual testing, providing a niche resource for QA professionals who need to strengthen their manual testing skills rather than being overwhelmed by automation-focused content.
  • Beginner-Friendly
    The platform appears designed to be accessible for those new to software testing, offering foundational knowledge and guidance that helps newcomers enter the QA field without requiring prior technical expertise.
  • Structured Learning Path
    The site offers organized content that guides learners through manual testing concepts in a logical progression, making it easier to build knowledge incrementally rather than jumping between disconnected topics.
  • Practical and Job-Oriented
    The platform focuses on practical, real-world manual testing skills that are directly applicable to job roles, helping testers prepare for actual work scenarios and interviews in QA positions.
  • Free or Affordable Access
    ManualTesting.dev provides accessible content without significant financial barriers, making it a cost-effective option for individuals looking to learn manual testing without investing in expensive courses or certifications.

Possible disadvantages of ManualTesting.dev

  • Limited Scope
    By focusing exclusively on manual testing, the platform may not adequately prepare testers for the modern QA landscape where automation skills are increasingly expected and valued by employers.
  • Relatively Unknown Platform
    ManualTesting.dev is not as well-established or widely recognized as major learning platforms like Udemy, Coursera, or ISTQB resources, which may limit community support and peer interaction.
  • Limited Advanced Content
    The platform may lack depth for experienced QA professionals looking for advanced testing methodologies, complex test strategy development, or specialized domain testing knowledge.
  • Smaller Community
    Compared to larger testing communities like Ministry of Testing or Software Testing Help, the platform likely has a smaller user base, resulting in fewer discussion opportunities, peer reviews, and networking possibilities.
  • Content Freshness Concerns
    As a smaller, niche website, there may be concerns about how frequently the content is updated to reflect current industry trends, tools, and best practices in manual testing.

Analysis of ManualTesting.dev

Overall verdict

  • ManualTesting.dev appears to be a niche resource site focused on manual testing concepts, tutorials, and interview preparation for QA professionals. It's a solid, budget-friendly (often free) option for learners wanting to build foundational manual testing skills, though it may lack the depth, interactivity, or certification value of paid, structured courses.

Why this product is good

  • Provides free or low-cost access to manual testing concepts and materials, making it accessible for beginners
  • Focuses specifically on manual testing, offering targeted content rather than generic QA overviews
  • Often includes practical examples, sample test cases, and interview questions useful for job seekers
  • Simple, straightforward format that's easy to digest without needing extensive technical setup
  • Useful as a supplementary study resource alongside other QA learning platforms

Recommended for

  • Beginners entering the QA/software testing field looking for foundational knowledge
  • Job seekers preparing for manual testing interview questions
  • Students or self-learners who want free supplementary material on testing concepts
  • QA professionals needing a quick refresher on manual testing fundamentals
  • Those on a tight budget who can't afford premium testing courses or bootcamps

Responsive Viewer videos

Test Web Page Responsiveness in Chrome using Responsive Viewer

ManualTesting.dev videos

No ManualTesting.dev videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Responsive Viewer and ManualTesting.dev)
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Software Development Tools
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Software Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Responsive Viewer and ManualTesting.dev. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Responsive Viewer should be more popular than ManualTesting.dev. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Responsive Viewer mentions (2)

  • Efficient Visual Layout Testing with Chrome DevTools
    Bonus! Useful Chrome extension for Responsiveness Testing. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
  • What are some of the practices you have to ensure that whatever you are building is responsive across all platforms?
    This chrome extension with all of the breakpoints set up https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/responsive-viewer/inmopeiepgfljkpkidclfgbgbmfcennb. Source: almost 4 years ago

ManualTesting.dev mentions (1)

  • How I improved my confidence, code quality and became a better developer
    We built ManualTesting.dev, a simple and powerful tool, to help my team and people like me write code, test it, and deliver on time with confidence. - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Responsive Viewer and ManualTesting.dev, you can also consider the following products

Responsive View - Test your responsive design across different devices

Polypane - The browser for ambitious web developers that want to 5ร— their quality and efficiency.

Responsively - Develop responsive web-apps 5x faster!

Multi Screen Test - Test your site at different screen resolutions & devices.

Am I Responsive - see your website in multiple screen resolutions

Pixefy - Preview and debug responsive designs faster with Pixefy. View multiple devices side by side, sync scrolling and clicks, edit styles live, and ensure accessible, seamless experiences across every screen.