Software Alternatives & Startups

Responsive Viewer VS Ember-cli

Compare Responsive Viewer VS Ember-cli and see what are their differences

Responsive Viewer

View multiple screen dimensions in one view

Rating
0 reviews
Ember-cli

Application and Data, Libraries, and JavaScript Framework Components

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Responsive Viewer should be more popular than Ember-cli. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.

social mentions
2 vs 1
Design Tools popularity
81% vs 19%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Responsive Viewer
E
Ember-cli
Website chromewebstore.google.com cli.emberjs.com
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Responsive Viewer 4 features
E
Ember-cli 5 features
  • Device Simulation
    Responsive Viewer allows users to simulate how their website looks on various device screen sizes, helping ensure a responsive design.
  • Multiple Viewports
    Users can view how their website appears on multiple devices simultaneously, making it easier to spot layout issues across different screens.
  • Custom Device Support
    The tool provides options to add and preview custom devices, offering flexibility for developers targeting specific screen resolutions.
  • Real-time Refresh
    Responsive Viewer offers real-time browser refresh, allowing developers to see changes instantly as they edit code.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited to Google Chrome
    Since it is a Chrome extension, it's only available for Google Chrome users, limiting its accessibility for those using other browsers.
  • Performance Overheads
    Rendering multiple viewports simultaneously can lead to increased CPU and memory usage, potentially slowing down performance.
  • No Offline Use
    Responsive Viewer requires an internet connection to function, which might be inconvenient for developers working offline.
  • Extension Conflicts
    There might be conflicts with other browser extensions, potentially causing unexpected behavior during its use.
  • Convention over Configuration
    Ember-cli enforces strong conventions for file structure, naming, and project organization, which reduces decision fatigue and makes it easier for developers to jump between different Ember projects with minimal onboarding time.
  • Built-in Tooling
    Comes with a robust set of built-in tools including a development server, testing framework integration (QUnit), asset compilation, and live reload, reducing the need to manually configure and integrate third-party build tools.
  • Addon Ecosystem
    Ember-cli supports a rich ecosystem of addons that can be easily installed and integrated into projects, allowing developers to extend functionality without reinventing the wheel for common features.
  • Blueprints and Generators
    Provides powerful generator commands (blueprints) that scaffold components, routes, models, and other application pieces quickly, speeding up development and ensuring consistency across the codebase.
  • Stable Long-term Support
    Ember-cli follows Ember's release cycle with clear LTS (Long Term Support) versions, providing stability and predictability for teams maintaining large applications over time.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steep Learning Curve
    The strict conventions and unique architecture of Ember-cli can be difficult for newcomers to learn, especially those coming from more flexible frameworks or with no prior Ember experience.
  • Smaller Community Compared to Alternatives
    Compared to tools like Vite, Webpack, or CRA used with React/Vue, Ember-cli has a smaller community and ecosystem, which can mean fewer third-party resources, tutorials, and community-driven troubleshooting.
  • Build Performance
    For large applications, Ember-cli's build process can become slow, and while improvements have been made with embroider, some developers still report slower build times compared to more modern bundlers.
  • Rigid Structure
    The opinionated nature of Ember-cli, while helpful for consistency, can feel restrictive for developers who prefer more flexibility in structuring their applications or adopting non-standard patterns.
  • Migration Complexity
    Upgrading between major Ember-cli versions or migrating to newer build systems like Embroider can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for older or heavily customized applications.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Responsive Viewer
E
Ember-cli

No analysis of Responsive Viewer yet.

Overall verdict

  • Ember CLI is a solid, mature command-line tool for building Ember.js applications, offering strong conventions, built-in tooling, and a stable development workflow that has been refined over many years.

Why this product is good

  • Provides a standardized project structure and conventions, reducing setup decisions and configuration overhead
  • Includes built-in support for ES modules, testing, and asset compilation out of the box
  • Strong addon ecosystem allows easy integration of third-party functionality
  • Backed by the official Ember.js team, ensuring long-term support and consistent updates
  • Automatic reloading and rebuilding during development speeds up the workflow
  • Encourages best practices like testing and modular code organization

Recommended for

  • Teams building large-scale, maintainable web applications with Ember.js
  • Developers who prefer convention-over-configuration frameworks
  • Projects that require long-term stability and structured upgrade paths
  • Organizations already invested in the Ember.js ecosystem
  • Developers who value built-in testing and tooling integration without extra setup

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Responsive Viewer 1 video + Add
E
Ember-cli 0 videos + Add

Test Web Page Responsiveness in Chrome using Responsive Viewer

No Ember-cli videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Responsive Viewer
E
Ember-cli
81% 81%
19% 19%
0% 0%
100% 100%
79% 79%
21% 21%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Responsive Viewer and Ember-cli. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Responsive Viewer 2 mentions
E
Ember-cli 1 mention
  • Efficient Visual Layout Testing with Chrome DevTools
    Bonus! Useful Chrome extension for Responsiveness Testing. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • What are some of the practices you have to ensure that whatever you are building is responsive across all platforms?
    This chrome extension with all of the breakpoints set up https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/responsive-viewer/inmopeiepgfljkpkidclfgbgbmfcennb. Source: about 4 years ago
  • Help! Why does chrome console inner text and my program inner text not return the same values? (spent nearly the whole day trying to extract an element). Turned to reddit as its always had the best community. Any help is MASSIVELY appreciated. Puppeteer!!
    The webpage is LinkedIn.com. While this isn’t a framework, I know that are using https://cli.emberjs.com/release/. Source: about 5 years ago

Alternatives to Responsive Viewer and Ember-cli

When comparing Responsive Viewer and Ember-cli, you can also consider the following products.