Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Rerun VS Codeship

Compare Rerun VS Codeship and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Rerun logo Rerun

Restarts an app when the filesystem changes. Uses growl and FSEventStream if on OS X. - alexch/rerun

Codeship logo Codeship

Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.
  • Rerun Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03
  • Codeship Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19

Rerun features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Rerun requires minimal setup and uses a straightforward command-line interface, making it easy to get started with monitoring file changes.
  • Lightweight
    Rerun is a lightweight tool with minimal dependencies, reducing overhead and making it suitable for quick tasks without much configuration.
  • Broad Platform Support
    Rerun works on multiple platforms including Linux, macOS, and Windows, ensuring versatility and ease of integration into various development environments.
  • Immediate Feedback
    It provides immediate feedback by automatically rerunning specified commands whenever files change, which can streamline development and debugging processes.

Possible disadvantages of Rerun

  • Limited Features
    Rerun focuses on simplicity, which means it lacks some of the more advanced features found in other file watching or task-running tools like Gulp or Webpack.
  • Performance Overhead
    Continuous file monitoring can introduce some performance overhead, especially in large projects with many files.
  • Basic Integration
    Integration with other tools and workflows might require additional scripting and setup, as Rerun doesn't offer built-in support for many build systems or libraries.
  • Scalability Issues
    Rerun might not scale well for very large projects or complex use cases, as it is designed with simplicity in mind and may not handle intricate dependencies effectively.

Codeship features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Codeship offers an intuitive interface that simplifies the setup process, making it accessible for developers who may not be experienced with continuous integration (CI) and continuous deployment (CD) tools.
  • Integration with Cloud Services
    Codeship integrates seamlessly with cloud services such as AWS, Google Cloud, and Heroku, facilitating easy deployment of applications.
  • Flexible Workflows
    The tool provides support for both Codeship Basic and Codeship Pro, allowing for flexibility in choosing between a more straightforward or a more customizable CI/CD workflow.
  • Docker Support
    Codeship Pro offers extensive support for Docker, allowing developers to use containerization strategies for their build and deployment processes.
  • Parallel Test Pipelines
    It supports parallel test pipelines, which can significantly speed up the testing process and reduce build times.
  • Slack Integration
    Codeship integrates with communication tools like Slack, enabling notifications and updates directly within team communication channels.

Possible disadvantages of Codeship

  • Cost
    Codeship can be more expensive compared to other CI/CD tools, particularly for larger teams or more complex projects that require more build resources.
  • Limited Customization
    For highly customized CI/CD processes, Codeship Basic might be limiting. Users may need to switch to Codeship Pro, which requires more configuration and a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    Users have reported occasional performance bottlenecks, particularly under heavy workloads, which can slow down the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Plugin Ecosystem
    The plugin ecosystem for Codeship is not as extensive as some other CI/CD tools like Jenkins, potentially limiting its integration capabilities.
  • Learning Curve
    While Codeship Basic is relatively easy to use, Codeship Pro has a steeper learning curve, particularly for users who are new to Docker and advanced CI/CD practices.
  • Support
    Although support is available, some users have reported slower response times and less comprehensive support compared to other CI/CD platforms.

Analysis of Rerun

Overall verdict

  • Rerun is considered a good tool for developers who need a robust solution for automating and managing repetitive processes. Its integration capabilities and performance can make it a worthwhile addition to development toolchains.

Why this product is good

  • GitHub's Rerun is a tool that is praised for its ability to efficiently manage and automate repetitive tasks in software development environments. It offers functionalities such as re-running builds only when necessary, integrating well with CI/CD pipelines, and providing developers with greater control over their workflows. These features can significantly enhance productivity and reduce time spent on recurrent tasks.

Recommended for

    Rerun is particularly recommended for software developers and DevOps engineers who regularly work with continuous integration and continuous deployment practices. It's beneficial for teams looking to streamline their development processes and reduce manual intervention in build and deployment workflows.

Rerun videos

Nixon Rerun: 2 Year Updated Review!

More videos:

  • Review - Duo Rerun! Should You Summon? Ingo &Emmett Pokefair Rerun Banner Review! | Pokemon Masters EX
  • Review - Nixon Rerun review

Codeship videos

LinuxFest Northwest 2017: Continuous Delivery to Microsoft Azure with Docker through Codeship

More videos:

  • Review - The Codeship --ย Continuous Deployment made simple

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Rerun and Codeship)
Finance
100 100%
0% 0
Continuous Integration
0 0%
100% 100
Recurring Billing
100 100%
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Rerun and Codeship. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Rerun and Codeship

Rerun Reviews

We have no reviews of Rerun yet.
Be the first one to post

Codeship Reviews

The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
Codeship, a CI/CD platform based in the cloud, has an interface that is easy for users and it can integrate with numerous tools and services people are familiar with. It works well for different programming languages and platforms, which makes it suitable for many teams involved in development work.
Source: morninglif.com
Top 10 Most Popular Jenkins Alternatives for DevOps in 2024
CodeShip is a CloudBees SaaS platform that provides a managed CI/CD experience in the cloud. Itโ€™s designed to give control back to developers by providing a guided workflow for creating and maintaining CI/CD pipelines. This avoids much of the complexity thatโ€™s associated with Jenkins.
Source: spacelift.io
10 Jenkins Alternatives in 2021 for Developers
You could consider using CodeShip to help you to optimize CI/CD cloud deployment. CodeShip can be used by just about any type of development team that looks to increase the efficiency and automation of their code delivery. You can get started within minutes and gain access to an incredible amount of control when setting everything up. The customization options will seem...
The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
CodeShip is a hosted continuous integration and continuous delivery platform found by CloudBees. It provides fast feedback and customized environments to build applications. It provides integration with almost anything and is good at helping you scale as per your needs. It comes free for up to 100 monthly builds.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Rerun seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Rerun mentions (3)

  • Web Server Kill Process on Ports
    Live or hot reloading all possible things makes me happy, so I was glad to implement rerun on my server immediately after learning about it. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • Is using the gem Guard still state of the art in TDD with Ruby?
    I use rerun to rerun all tests on file change (retest gem posted elsewhere can be smarter about which tests to run). Rerun also lets me relaunch a development app on changes. Source: almost 5 years ago
  • Command Line Tools for Productive Programmers
    I use https://github.com/alexch/rerun for that. - Source: Hacker News / almost 5 years ago

Codeship mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Codeship yet. Tracking of Codeship recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Rerun and Codeship, you can also consider the following products

Stripe - Online payment processing for internet businesses. Stripe is a suite of payment APIs that powers commerce for online businesses of all sizes. Use Stripeโ€™s payment platform to accept and process payments online for easy-to-use commerce solutions.

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Chargebee - Chargebee lets you manage subscriptions and payments at scale, handle custom recurring billing scenarios, reduce subscription churn and simplify accounting.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

GoCardless - UK's leading online direct debit provider

Travis CI - Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CIโ€™s precision syntaxโ€”all with the developer in mind.