Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Reqsave VS Thunder Client

Compare Reqsave VS Thunder Client and see what are their differences

This page does not exist

Reqsave logo Reqsave

Execute web requests with your browser.

Thunder Client logo Thunder Client

Rest API client for VS Code, lightweight Postman alternative
  • Reqsave Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-10
  • Thunder Client Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05

Reqsave features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Reqsave offers a simple and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to create, access, and manage their saved HTTP requests efficiently.
  • Efficient Organization
    Users can organize their requests into collections and folders, allowing for easy navigation and retrieval, enhancing productivity and workflow management.
  • Collaboration Features
    Reqsave allows multiple team members to collaborate simultaneously by sharing collections and requests, facilitating teamwork and communication.
  • Security Measures
    The platform employs encryption and secure protocols to ensure that users' data and requests are protected against unauthorized access.

Possible disadvantages of Reqsave

  • Limited Integration Options
    Reqsave may have limited integration capabilities with other tools or platforms compared to competitors, which could be a drawback for some users needing more connectivity.
  • Restricted Customization
    Users may find the customization options for the interface or features to be lacking, potentially limiting their ability to tailor the tool to their specific needs.
  • Cost Implications
    Depending on the tier of service and number of users, Reqsave might be expensive for small teams or individual developers, which could be a barrier to adoption.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its intuitive design, some users might experience a learning curve due to certain advanced features and settings, which can affect immediacy of use.

Thunder Client features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Thunder Client offers a clean and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to create and manage API requests without getting overwhelmed by complex features.
  • VS Code Integration
    Being an extension for Visual Studio Code, it is convenient for developers who already use VS Code, enabling seamless API testing within their development environment.
  • Lightweight
    Compared to other API testing tools, Thunder Client is lightweight, making it ideal for users who need a quick and simple solution for testing APIs without extensive configuration.
  • Environment Variables
    The tool allows the use of environment variables, enabling users to manage different environments effectively and switch between them easily.
  • Support for Collections
    Supports organizing requests into collections, allowing for efficient management and categorization of related requests.

Possible disadvantages of Thunder Client

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Thunder Client lacks some of the advanced features found in more robust API testing tools, such as automation scripts and extensive plugin support.
  • Dependency on VS Code
    As a VS Code extension, it requires Visual Studio Code to run. This dependency can be a drawback for users who prefer other code editors or standalone applications.
  • No Collaboration Features
    Unlike some other API testing tools, Thunder Client does not have built-in collaboration features, which can limit its use in team environments.
  • Platform Specific
    It is primarily designed for use within Visual Studio Code, which may not be ideal for users who work across multiple platforms or require a standalone solution.

Analysis of Thunder Client

Overall verdict

  • Thunder Client is a good option for developers who want a minimalistic and efficient tool for testing APIs without the need for a standalone application. It is particularly beneficial for those who use Visual Studio Code as their primary development environment.

Why this product is good

  • Thunder Client is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it a popular choice for developers who require a lightweight API testing solution. It is integrated directly into Visual Studio Code, allowing users to manage API requests without switching between applications. It supports RESTful services and offers features like collections, environment variables, and authentication support, comparable to other tools but within a more streamlined interface.

Recommended for

  • Developers who prefer working within Visual Studio Code
  • Those who need a simple and fast tool for testing REST APIs
  • Developers looking for an alternative to more complex API testing tools
  • Teams or individuals with straightforward API testing needs and require easy sharing of request collections

Reqsave videos

No Reqsave videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Thunder Client videos

Thunder Client - API testing right inside VSCode

More videos:

  • Review - Do you really need Postman? | Use Thunder Client - VSCode extension | Easy & Lightweight
  • Review - Thunder client - Vscode extension | Say no to Postman

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Reqsave and Thunder Client)
API Tools
19 19%
81% 81
Developer Tools
17 17%
83% 83
APIs
10 10%
90% 90
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Reqsave and Thunder Client. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Reqsave and Thunder Client

Reqsave Reviews

We have no reviews of Reqsave yet.
Be the first one to post

Thunder Client Reviews

Best Postman Alternatives To Consider in 2025
This free, feature-rich extension integrates seamlessly with VSCode, making it ideal for developers who prefer a unified environment. Thunder Client offers collection management, environment variables, and basic automation capabilities. It stands out for its tight integration with VSCode's debugging tools.
15 Best Postman Alternatives for Automated API Testing [2022 Updated]
Thunder Client is a Vscode Postman alternative that runs as a Visual Studio Code extension (not open source). Its design focuses on simple and efficient HTTP clients while constructing or connecting with APIs. Thunder Client can handle a wide range of API requests. It effectively processes immense amounts of data simultaneously while not slowing down the VS Code program.
Source: testsigma.com
Top 5 Postman alternatives
Thunder Client is a VS Code extension focusing on being a simple and efficient HTTP client while building or integrating with APIs. It supports collections as a way to group relevant requests. Moreover, ThunderClient supports the concept of Environment and Environment Variables to store and re-use values within multiple requests. Finally, ThunderClinet offers a UI that you...
Source: testfully.io

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Reqsave and Thunder Client, you can also consider the following products

HTTPie for Terminal - Developers all around the world rely on HTTPie for API testing.

Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development

ReqRes - A hosted REST-API ready to respond to your AJAX requests.

Insomnia REST - Design, debug, test, and mock APIs locally, on Git, or cloud. Build better APIs collaboratively for the most popular protocols with a devโ€‘friendly UI, built-in automation, and an extensible plugin ecosystem.

hideAPIkey - Hide your API key from your front end

EchoAPI - Next-gen API development collaboration platform. More than just API design, debug, test, load-testing, and mock.