Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

RemoteStorage VS Flexible Datasync

Compare RemoteStorage VS Flexible Datasync and see what are their differences

ScreenshotMAX
The all-in-one Screenshot API for developers: capture websites, generate PDFs, record videos, and automate it all with powerful, scalable infrastructure. No browser setup, no hassle. Just clean results, fast. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

RemoteStorage logo RemoteStorage

An open protocol for per-user storage OWN YOUR DATA

Flexible Datasync logo Flexible Datasync

Boost the development of your realtime apps !
  • RemoteStorage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-15
  • Flexible Datasync Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-21

RemoteStorage features and specs

  • User Control
    RemoteStorage allows users to host their own data, giving them greater control over their information and how it's shared with applications. This enhances privacy and security for users.
  • Decentralization
    The platform supports decentralized data storage, reducing reliance on centralized servers and eliminating single points of failure.
  • Interoperability
    RemoteStorage uses a simple protocol that encourages interoperability between various applications, allowing users to switch between apps without losing access to their data.
  • Open Source
    The entire RemoteStorage protocol and libraries are open source, fostering transparency and allowing developers to contribute to its development.
  • Developer-Friendly
    Developers can easily use RemoteStorage libraries to integrate the protocol into their applications, facilitating seamless data management across different services.

Possible disadvantages of RemoteStorage

  • Setup Complexity
    While RemoteStorage offers user control, the need to set up a personal data hosting solution might be complex and challenging for non-technical users.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    As a relatively niche solution, the ecosystem of applications supporting RemoteStorage might be smaller compared to more ubiquitous cloud storage services.
  • Performance Variability
    The performance of data access and synchronization can be variable depending on the hosting infrastructure chosen by the user, potentially leading to slower speeds.
  • Data Management Responsibility
    Users are responsible for managing backups and ensuring data availability, which can add an additional layer of responsibility and risk.
  • Potential Scalability Issues
    Depending on how the personal storage solution is set up, users might experience scalability issues as their storage needs grow.

Flexible Datasync features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to RemoteStorage and Flexible Datasync)

RemoteStorage

Flexible Datasync

Developer Tools
89 89%
Developer Tools
11% 11
Realtime Backend / API
87 87%
Realtime Backend / API
13% 13
Mobile Push Messaging
81 81%
Mobile Push Messaging
19% 19
App Development
79 79%
App Development
21% 21

User comments

Share your experience with using RemoteStorage and Flexible Datasync. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, RemoteStorage seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

RemoteStorage mentions (22)

  • Poor Man's Back End-as-a-Service (BaaS), Similar to Firebase/Supabase/Pocketbase
    The closest I'm aware of is https://remotestorage.io/ , the protocol has been relatively static for a while but not widely adopted. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • A Local-First Case Study
    Https://remotestorage.io while it's a specific protocol for storing user data on a compatible server, their library also provides Google Drive integration. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Local First, Forever
    Https://remotestorage.io/ was a protocol intended for this. IIRC the visison was that all applications could implement this and you could provide that application with your remotestorage URL, which you could self host. I looked into this some time ago as I was fed up with WebDAV being the only viable open protocol for file shares/synchronization (especially after hosting my own NextCloud instance, which OOMed... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Show HN: RemoteStorage – sync localStorage across devices and browsers
    Not to be confused with https://remotestorage.io/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Simple Lasts Longer
    This doesn't support the various consumer cloud storage APIs, but you've just reminded me of a project I ran into years ago that seems to still be around: https://remotestorage.io/ There's also Solid which attempts to do something similar: https://solidproject.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

Flexible Datasync mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Flexible Datasync yet. Tracking of Flexible Datasync recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing RemoteStorage and Flexible Datasync, you can also consider the following products

Firebase - Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications for mobile and web.

restdb.io - restdb.io lets you create databases and REST APIs quickly. Development databases are free. Powerful web-based and mobile-friendly data management.

Supabase - An open source Firebase alternative

Etebase - Etebase makes it easy to build end-to-end encrypted applications by taking care of the encryption and its related challenges.

Codezero - Collaborative Local Microservices Development

GUN - Self-hosted Firebase.

Loading...